From 4164006a834b93995fb3535508fdf18bff92df7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Kacur Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 09:50:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rt-tests: hackbench: Fix compile warning about fall through print_usage_exit(0) never returns, but the compiler doesn't understand this. In any case it is not harmful to add a break after this statement. Do so to keep the unhelpful compiler warning from triggering. Signed-off-by: John Kacur --- src/hackbench/hackbench.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/hackbench/hackbench.c b/src/hackbench/hackbench.c index dda7690b79a0..69dd5f087fb6 100644 --- a/src/hackbench/hackbench.c +++ b/src/hackbench/hackbench.c @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static void process_options(int argc, char *argv[]) break; case 'h': print_usage_exit(0); + break; case 'l': if (!(argv[optind] && (loops = atoi(optarg)) > 0)) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: --loops|-l requires an integer > 0\n", argv[0]); -- 2.38.1