Sadly, ldc ppc64 support has detoriated so much that it no longer works
with any current llvm version. I'll keep an eye on things and re-enable
it once it's fixed, but right now it's just broken and upstream is
suggesting to disable the support for now.
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2356
This patch adds two additional rpm macros, __brp_mangle_shebangs_exclude_file
and __brp_mangle_shebangs_exclude_from_file, to specify files from which
to read the extended regexps used for excluding shebangs and target
files.
Additionally, this adds documentation in the macros file and
--help/--usage/-?/-h to brp-mangle-shebangs, so that it's possible to
actually discover what the intended behavior is without reading the
script itself.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
If %ldconfig is not defined, then "%ldconfig_post/%ldconfig_postun foo"
will expand to " foo" which is breaking packages.
Also now it is possible to move %end into post/postun.
Reported-by: Terje Røsten <terjeros@phys.ntnu.no>
References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548331
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org>
If people choose to use %ldconfig_post/%ldconfig_postun, let them to
deal with %end.
Reported-by: Harald Reindl <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547838
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org>
Some people tend to use comments in spec files which adds them into the
scriptlet and we don't want this.
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org>
Introduces __brp_mangle_shebangs_exclude_from and __brp_mangle_shebangs_exclude
* the first allows to explude specific paths from the mangling
* the second allows to exlude specific shebangs
Both are used with `grep -E`. Similar escaping rules as in [1] apply.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering
With https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
we try to remove ldconfig scriptlets, but it would make every package
look horrible with all those conditionals. So let's just wrap ldconfig
scriptlets into macro so it doesn't look that horrible and error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org>
If there are unpackaged symlinks, build will fail with unpackaged files.
People can %undefine __brp_ldconfig if they need to and they should make
sure that they call ldconfig themselves.
Right now, script doesn't guide packagers what to do, but it's not
prerequisite.
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org>
Add a separate macro for each brp we have, using standard naming
convention and conditionalize the usage in %__os_install_post.
Voilà, we have a standard way to disable (and also override) any brp
scripts from specs that need it and a common scheme for new brps
to follow.
Note that this is not supposed to change the existing behavior and
default build root policy invocations at all, any change in those
would be a thinko/typo/copy-paste error in this commit.
It doesn't belong to redhat-rpm-config which is about *srpm* buildtime..
This reverts commit ea5600c887.
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org>
