qemu-kvm/SOURCES/kvm-virtiofsd-extract-lo_do_open-from-lo_open.patch

168 lines
5.1 KiB
Diff

From c02ebc7e43f55b9423a065a7c53ba72bdb821c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:14:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: extract lo_do_open() from lo_open()
RH-Author: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20210209231456.1555472-2-jmaloy@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 101024
O-Subject: [RHEL-8.4.0 qemu-kvm PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: extract lo_do_open() from lo_open()
Bugzilla: 1919111
RH-Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Both lo_open() and lo_create() have similar code to open a file. Extract
a common lo_do_open() function from lo_open() that will be used by
lo_create() in a later commit.
Since lo_do_open() does not otherwise need fuse_req_t req, convert
lo_add_fd_mapping() to use struct lo_data *lo instead.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210204150208.367837-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
(cherry-picked from commit 8afaaee976965b7fb90ec225a51d60f35c5f173c)
Conflict: update_open_flags() takes fewer arguments in this version
than in upstream. Instead of applying commit e12a0edafeb
("virtiofsd: Add -o allow_direct_io|no_allow_direct_io
options") we keep the old signature, since this seems to
be an unrelated change.
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy.redhat.com>
---
tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index f41a6b07c8..518ba11c47 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -439,17 +439,17 @@ static void lo_map_remove(struct lo_map *map, size_t key)
}
/* Assumes lo->mutex is held */
-static ssize_t lo_add_fd_mapping(fuse_req_t req, int fd)
+static ssize_t lo_add_fd_mapping(struct lo_data *lo, int fd)
{
struct lo_map_elem *elem;
- elem = lo_map_alloc_elem(&lo_data(req)->fd_map);
+ elem = lo_map_alloc_elem(&lo->fd_map);
if (!elem) {
return -1;
}
elem->fd = fd;
- return elem - lo_data(req)->fd_map.elems;
+ return elem - lo->fd_map.elems;
}
/* Assumes lo->mutex is held */
@@ -1712,6 +1712,38 @@ static void update_open_flags(int writeback, struct fuse_file_info *fi)
fi->flags &= ~O_DIRECT;
}
+static int lo_do_open(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode,
+ struct fuse_file_info *fi)
+{
+ char buf[64];
+ ssize_t fh;
+ int fd;
+
+ update_open_flags(lo->writeback, fi);
+
+ sprintf(buf, "%i", inode->fd);
+ fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, buf, fi->flags & ~O_NOFOLLOW);
+ if (fd == -1) {
+ return errno;
+ }
+
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex);
+ fh = lo_add_fd_mapping(lo, fd);
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
+ if (fh == -1) {
+ close(fd);
+ return ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ fi->fh = fh;
+ if (lo->cache == CACHE_NONE) {
+ fi->direct_io = 1;
+ } else if (lo->cache == CACHE_ALWAYS) {
+ fi->keep_cache = 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void lo_create(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
mode_t mode, struct fuse_file_info *fi)
{
@@ -1752,7 +1784,7 @@ static void lo_create(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
ssize_t fh;
pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex);
- fh = lo_add_fd_mapping(req, fd);
+ fh = lo_add_fd_mapping(lo, fd);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
if (fh == -1) {
close(fd);
@@ -1943,38 +1975,25 @@ static void lo_fsyncdir(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, int datasync,
static void lo_open(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct fuse_file_info *fi)
{
- int fd;
- ssize_t fh;
- char buf[64];
struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req);
+ struct lo_inode *inode = lo_inode(req, ino);
+ int err;
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_open(ino=%" PRIu64 ", flags=%d)\n", ino,
fi->flags);
- update_open_flags(lo->writeback, fi);
-
- sprintf(buf, "%i", lo_fd(req, ino));
- fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, buf, fi->flags & ~O_NOFOLLOW);
- if (fd == -1) {
- return (void)fuse_reply_err(req, errno);
- }
-
- pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex);
- fh = lo_add_fd_mapping(req, fd);
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
- if (fh == -1) {
- close(fd);
- fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
+ if (!inode) {
+ fuse_reply_err(req, EBADF);
return;
}
- fi->fh = fh;
- if (lo->cache == CACHE_NONE) {
- fi->direct_io = 1;
- } else if (lo->cache == CACHE_ALWAYS) {
- fi->keep_cache = 1;
+ err = lo_do_open(lo, inode, fi);
+ lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
+ if (err) {
+ fuse_reply_err(req, err);
+ } else {
+ fuse_reply_open(req, fi);
}
- fuse_reply_open(req, fi);
}
static void lo_release(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
--
2.18.2