rpms
/
qemu-kvm
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity
qemu-kvm/kvm-numa-Validate-cluster-a...

146 lines
6.0 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From 760a2f284f6d4cd3cd3b1685411bbca21c4ad233 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 20:20:09 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] numa: Validate cluster and NUMA node boundary if required
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
RH-Author: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
RH-MergeRequest: 175: hw/arm: Validate CPU cluster and NUMA node boundary for RHEL machines
RH-Bugzilla: 2171363
RH-Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
RH-Commit: [1/3] 24580064b9a0076ec4d9a916839d85135ac48cd9
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171363
For some architectures like ARM64, multiple CPUs in one cluster can be
associated with different NUMA nodes, which is irregular configuration
because we shouldn't have this in baremetal environment. The irregular
configuration causes Linux guest to misbehave, as the following warning
messages indicate.
-smp 6,maxcpus=6,sockets=2,clusters=1,cores=3,threads=1 \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=ram0 \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=ram1 \
-numa node,nodeid=2,cpus=4-5,memdev=ram2 \
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2271 build_sched_domains+0x284/0x910
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-268.el9.aarch64 #1
pstate: 00400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : build_sched_domains+0x284/0x910
lr : build_sched_domains+0x184/0x910
sp : ffff80000804bd50
x29: ffff80000804bd50 x28: 0000000000000002 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: ffff800009cf9a80 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff800009cbf840
x23: ffff000080325000 x22: ffff0000005df800 x21: ffff80000a4ce508
x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff000080324440 x18: 0000000000000014
x17: 00000000388925c0 x16: 000000005386a066 x15: 000000009c10cc2e
x14: 00000000000001c0 x13: 0000000000000001 x12: ffff00007fffb1a0
x11: ffff00007fffb180 x10: ffff80000a4ce508 x9 : 0000000000000041
x8 : ffff80000a4ce500 x7 : ffff80000a4cf920 x6 : 0000000000000001
x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000007 x3 : 0000000000000002
x2 : 0000000000001000 x1 : ffff80000a4cf928 x0 : 0000000000000001
Call trace:
build_sched_domains+0x284/0x910
sched_init_domains+0xac/0xe0
sched_init_smp+0x48/0xc8
kernel_init_freeable+0x140/0x1ac
kernel_init+0x28/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Improve the situation to warn when multiple CPUs in one cluster have
been associated with different NUMA nodes. However, one NUMA node is
allowed to be associated with different clusters.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230509002739.18388-2-gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit a494fdb715832000ee9047a549a35aacfea8175e)
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
hw/core/machine.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/boards.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index c28702b690..5abdc8c39b 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -1496,6 +1496,45 @@ static void machine_numa_finish_cpu_init(MachineState *machine)
g_string_free(s, true);
}
+static void validate_cpu_cluster_to_numa_boundary(MachineState *ms)
+{
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+ NumaState *state = ms->numa_state;
+ const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
+ const CPUArchId *cpus = possible_cpus->cpus;
+ int i, j;
+
+ if (state->num_nodes <= 1 || possible_cpus->len <= 1) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The Linux scheduling domain can't be parsed when the multiple CPUs
+ * in one cluster have been associated with different NUMA nodes. However,
+ * it's fine to associate one NUMA node with CPUs in different clusters.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < possible_cpus->len; i++) {
+ for (j = i + 1; j < possible_cpus->len; j++) {
+ if (cpus[i].props.has_socket_id &&
+ cpus[i].props.has_cluster_id &&
+ cpus[i].props.has_node_id &&
+ cpus[j].props.has_socket_id &&
+ cpus[j].props.has_cluster_id &&
+ cpus[j].props.has_node_id &&
+ cpus[i].props.socket_id == cpus[j].props.socket_id &&
+ cpus[i].props.cluster_id == cpus[j].props.cluster_id &&
+ cpus[i].props.node_id != cpus[j].props.node_id) {
+ warn_report("CPU-%d and CPU-%d in socket-%" PRId64 "-cluster-%" PRId64
+ " have been associated with node-%" PRId64 " and node-%" PRId64
+ " respectively. It can cause OSes like Linux to"
+ " misbehave", i, j, cpus[i].props.socket_id,
+ cpus[i].props.cluster_id, cpus[i].props.node_id,
+ cpus[j].props.node_id);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
MemoryRegion *machine_consume_memdev(MachineState *machine,
HostMemoryBackend *backend)
{
@@ -1581,6 +1620,9 @@ void machine_run_board_init(MachineState *machine, const char *mem_path, Error *
numa_complete_configuration(machine);
if (machine->numa_state->num_nodes) {
machine_numa_finish_cpu_init(machine);
+ if (machine_class->cpu_cluster_has_numa_boundary) {
+ validate_cpu_cluster_to_numa_boundary(machine);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
index 5f08bd7550..3628671228 100644
--- a/include/hw/boards.h
+++ b/include/hw/boards.h
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ struct MachineClass {
bool nvdimm_supported;
bool numa_mem_supported;
bool auto_enable_numa;
+ bool cpu_cluster_has_numa_boundary;
SMPCompatProps smp_props;
const char *default_ram_id;
--
2.39.3
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink