qemu-kvm/SOURCES/kvm-spapr-Correct-inverted-test-in-spapr_pc_dimm_node.patch

56 lines
2.2 KiB
Diff

From c279e652b149621847ef38f08254569632f7ee3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:23:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] spapr: Correct inverted test in spapr_pc_dimm_node()
RH-Author: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20180725072341.8452-1-dgibson@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 81498
O-Subject: [RHEL-8.0 qemu-kvm PATCH] spapr: Correct inverted test in spapr_pc_dimm_node()
Bugzilla: 1601671
RH-Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Serhii Popovych <spopovyc@redhat.com>
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This function was introduced between v2.11 and v2.12 to replace obsolete
ways of specifying the NUMA nodes for DIMMs. It's used to find the correct
node for an LMB, by locating which DIMM object it lies within.
Unfortunately, one of the checks is inverted, so we check whether the
address is less than two different things, rather than actually checking
a range. This introduced a regression, meaning that after a reboot qemu
will advertise incorrect node information for memory to the guest.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit ccc2cef8b3f1dedd059924eb8ec1a87eff8ef607)
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601671
Brew: https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=17345816
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo C. L. de Paula <ddepaula@redhat.com>
---
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index ef00937..7de3f07 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static uint32_t spapr_pc_dimm_node(MemoryDeviceInfoList *list, ram_addr_t addr)
if (value && value->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_INFO_KIND_DIMM) {
PCDIMMDeviceInfo *pcdimm_info = value->u.dimm.data;
- if (pcdimm_info->addr >= addr &&
+ if (addr >= pcdimm_info->addr &&
addr < (pcdimm_info->addr + pcdimm_info->size)) {
return pcdimm_info->node;
}
--
1.8.3.1