qemu-kvm/SOURCES/kvm-test-bdrv-drain-Test-node-deletion-in-subtree-recurs.patch

107 lines
3.7 KiB
Diff

From 419e706e717dd4fa9c63c118590788aea53b4001 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:21:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 14/49] test-bdrv-drain: Test node deletion in subtree
recursion
RH-Author: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20181010202213.7372-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 82591
O-Subject: [RHEL-8 qemu-kvm PATCH 11/44] test-bdrv-drain: Test node deletion in subtree recursion
Bugzilla: 1637976
RH-Acked-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
If bdrv_do_drained_begin() polls during its subtree recursion, the graph
can change and mess up the bs->children iteration. Test that this
doesn't happen.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit ebd31837618cdc7bda83090773dcdd87475d55b7)
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo C. L. de Paula <ddepaula@redhat.com>
---
tests/test-bdrv-drain.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-bdrv-drain.c b/tests/test-bdrv-drain.c
index 8918a94..38706b0 100644
--- a/tests/test-bdrv-drain.c
+++ b/tests/test-bdrv-drain.c
@@ -875,7 +875,8 @@ static void coroutine_fn test_co_delete_by_drain(void *opaque)
* If @detach_instead_of_delete is set, the BDS is not going to be
* deleted but will only detach all of its children.
*/
-static void do_test_delete_by_drain(bool detach_instead_of_delete)
+static void do_test_delete_by_drain(bool detach_instead_of_delete,
+ enum drain_type drain_type)
{
BlockBackend *blk;
BlockDriverState *bs, *child_bs, *null_bs;
@@ -931,9 +932,23 @@ static void do_test_delete_by_drain(bool detach_instead_of_delete)
* test_co_delete_by_drain() resuming. Thus, @bs will be deleted
* and the coroutine will exit while this drain operation is still
* in progress. */
- bdrv_ref(child_bs);
- bdrv_drain(child_bs);
- bdrv_unref(child_bs);
+ switch (drain_type) {
+ case BDRV_DRAIN:
+ bdrv_ref(child_bs);
+ bdrv_drain(child_bs);
+ bdrv_unref(child_bs);
+ break;
+ case BDRV_SUBTREE_DRAIN:
+ /* Would have to ref/unref bs here for !detach_instead_of_delete, but
+ * then the whole test becomes pointless because the graph changes
+ * don't occur during the drain any more. */
+ assert(detach_instead_of_delete);
+ bdrv_subtree_drained_begin(bs);
+ bdrv_subtree_drained_end(bs);
+ break;
+ default:
+ g_assert_not_reached();
+ }
while (!dbdd.done) {
aio_poll(qemu_get_aio_context(), true);
@@ -946,15 +961,19 @@ static void do_test_delete_by_drain(bool detach_instead_of_delete)
}
}
-
static void test_delete_by_drain(void)
{
- do_test_delete_by_drain(false);
+ do_test_delete_by_drain(false, BDRV_DRAIN);
}
static void test_detach_by_drain(void)
{
- do_test_delete_by_drain(true);
+ do_test_delete_by_drain(true, BDRV_DRAIN);
+}
+
+static void test_detach_by_drain_subtree(void)
+{
+ do_test_delete_by_drain(true, BDRV_SUBTREE_DRAIN);
}
@@ -1005,8 +1024,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
g_test_add_func("/bdrv-drain/blockjob/drain_subtree",
test_blockjob_drain_subtree);
- g_test_add_func("/bdrv-drain/deletion", test_delete_by_drain);
- g_test_add_func("/bdrv-drain/detach", test_detach_by_drain);
+ g_test_add_func("/bdrv-drain/deletion/drain", test_delete_by_drain);
+ g_test_add_func("/bdrv-drain/detach/drain", test_detach_by_drain);
+ g_test_add_func("/bdrv-drain/detach/drain_subtree", test_detach_by_drain_subtree);
ret = g_test_run();
qemu_event_destroy(&done_event);
--
1.8.3.1