From 27c1d979a994f5afc59c3520af58d15aa5aae723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 17:39:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 29/32] target/s390x: kvm: Honor storage keys during emulation RH-Author: Thomas Huth RH-MergeRequest: 109: Honor storage keys during emulation of I/O instructions RH-Commit: [2/2] 346dee1e13bfe1c074e4c6a4417091711d852f9c (thuth/qemu-kvm-cs9) RH-Bugzilla: 2111994 RH-Acked-by: Cornelia Huck RH-Acked-by: David Hildenbrand RH-Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda Storage key controlled protection is currently not honored when emulating instructions. If available, enable key protection for the MEM_OP ioctl, thereby enabling it for the s390_cpu_virt_mem_* functions, when using kvm. As a result, the emulation of the following instructions honors storage keys: * CLP The Synch I/O CLP command would need special handling in order to support storage keys, but is currently not supported. * CHSC Performing commands asynchronously would require special handling, but commands are currently always synchronous. * STSI * TSCH Must (and does) not change channel if terminated due to protection. * MSCH Suppressed on protection, works because fetching instruction. * SSCH Suppressed on protection, works because fetching instruction. * STSCH * STCRW Suppressed on protection, this works because no partial store is possible, because the operand cannot span multiple pages. * PCISTB * MPCIFC * STPCIFC Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch Message-Id: <20220506153956.2217601-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth (cherry picked from commit 54354861d21b69ec0781f43e67b8d4f6edad7e3f) Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111994 Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c index 74f089d87f..1f1d1a33b8 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c @@ -152,12 +152,15 @@ const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = { static int cap_sync_regs; static int cap_async_pf; static int cap_mem_op; +static int cap_mem_op_extension; static int cap_s390_irq; static int cap_ri; static int cap_hpage_1m; static int cap_vcpu_resets; static int cap_protected; +static bool mem_op_storage_key_support; + static int active_cmma; static int kvm_s390_query_mem_limit(uint64_t *memory_limit) @@ -355,6 +358,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS); cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF); cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); + cap_mem_op_extension = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION); + mem_op_storage_key_support = cap_mem_op_extension > 0; cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS); cap_protected = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); @@ -843,6 +848,7 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf, : KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ, .buf = (uint64_t)hostbuf, .ar = ar, + .key = (cpu->env.psw.mask & PSW_MASK_KEY) >> PSW_SHIFT_KEY, }; int ret; @@ -852,6 +858,9 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf, if (!hostbuf) { mem_op.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY; } + if (mem_op_storage_key_support) { + mem_op.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION; + } ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &mem_op); if (ret < 0) { -- 2.31.1