qemu-kvm/kvm-block-file-posix-Unaligned-O_DIRECT-block-status.patch

From cff152749afe8b045db50fdd065756a217efa6e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:07:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status

RH-Author: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20190625210710.20946-2-mreitz@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 88945
O-Subject: [RHEL-AV-8.1.0 qemu-kvm PATCH 1/2] block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status
Bugzilla: 1588356
RH-Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

Currently, qemu crashes whenever someone queries the block status of an
unaligned image tail of an O_DIRECT image:
$ echo > foo
$ qemu-img map --image-opts driver=file,filename=foo,cache.direct=on
Offset          Length          Mapped to       File
qemu-img: block/io.c:2093: bdrv_co_block_status: Assertion `*pnum &&
QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(*pnum, align) && align > offset - aligned_offset'
failed.

This is because bdrv_co_block_status() checks that the result returned
by the driver's implementation is aligned to the request_alignment, but
file-posix can fail to do so, which is actually mentioned in a comment
there: "[...] possibly including a partial sector at EOF".

Fix this by rounding up those partial sectors.

There are two possible alternative fixes:
(1) We could refuse to open unaligned image files with O_DIRECT
    altogether.  That sounds reasonable until you realize that qcow2
    does necessarily not fill up its metadata clusters, and that nobody
    runs qemu-img create with O_DIRECT.  Therefore, unpreallocated qcow2
    files usually have an unaligned image tail.

(2) bdrv_co_block_status() could ignore unaligned tails.  It actually
    throws away everything past the EOF already, so that sounds
    reasonable.
    Unfortunately, the block layer knows file lengths only with a
    granularity of BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, so bdrv_co_block_status() usually
    would have to guess whether its file length information is inexact
    or whether the driver is broken.

Fixing what raw_co_block_status() returns is the safest thing to do.

There seems to be no other block driver that sets request_alignment and
does not make sure that it always returns aligned values.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9c3db310ff0b7473272ae8dce5e04e2f8a825390)
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
---
 block/file-posix.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 1cf4ee4..c185f34 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -2475,6 +2475,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
     off_t data = 0, hole = 0;
     int ret;
 
+    assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset | bytes, bs->bl.request_alignment));
+
     ret = fd_open(bs);
     if (ret < 0) {
         return ret;
@@ -2500,6 +2502,20 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
         /* On a data extent, compute bytes to the end of the extent,
          * possibly including a partial sector at EOF. */
         *pnum = MIN(bytes, hole - offset);
+
+        /*
+         * We are not allowed to return partial sectors, though, so
+         * round up if necessary.
+         */
+        if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(*pnum, bs->bl.request_alignment)) {
+            int64_t file_length = raw_getlength(bs);
+            if (file_length > 0) {
+                /* Ignore errors, this is just a safeguard */
+                assert(hole == file_length);
+            }
+            *pnum = ROUND_UP(*pnum, bs->bl.request_alignment);
+        }
+
         ret = BDRV_BLOCK_DATA;
     } else {
         /* On a hole, compute bytes to the beginning of the next extent.  */
-- 
1.8.3.1