qemu-kvm/kvm-virtiofsd-optionally-return-inode-pointer-from-lo_do.patch

From 24833a2db44e39ec7652779a0fa2e70983b9cb4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:15:17 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 06/54] virtiofsd: optionally return inode pointer from
 lo_do_lookup()

RH-Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20210210111518.228148-3-stefanha@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 101033
O-Subject: [RHEL-AV-8.4.0 qemu-kvm PATCH 2/3] virtiofsd: optionally return inode pointer from lo_do_lookup()
Bugzilla: 1920740
RH-Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

lo_do_lookup() finds an existing inode or allocates a new one. It
increments nlookup so that the inode stays alive until the client
releases it.

Existing callers don't need the struct lo_inode so the function doesn't
return it. Extend the function to optionally return the inode. The next
commit will need it.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20210204150208.367837-3-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 22d2ece71e533310da31f2857ebc4a00d91968b3)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) <etrunko@redhat.com>
---
 tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 218e20e9d7..2bd050b620 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -843,11 +843,13 @@ static int do_statx(struct lo_data *lo, int dirfd, const char *pathname,
 }
 
 /*
- * Increments nlookup and caller must release refcount using
- * lo_inode_put(&parent).
+ * Increments nlookup on the inode on success. unref_inode_lolocked() must be
+ * called eventually to decrement nlookup again. If inodep is non-NULL, the
+ * inode pointer is stored and the caller must call lo_inode_put().
  */
 static int lo_do_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
-                        struct fuse_entry_param *e)
+                        struct fuse_entry_param *e,
+                        struct lo_inode **inodep)
 {
     int newfd;
     int res;
@@ -857,6 +859,10 @@ static int lo_do_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
     struct lo_inode *inode = NULL;
     struct lo_inode *dir = lo_inode(req, parent);
 
+    if (inodep) {
+        *inodep = NULL;
+    }
+
     /*
      * name_to_handle_at() and open_by_handle_at() can reach here with fuse
      * mount point in guest, but we don't have its inode info in the
@@ -924,7 +930,14 @@ static int lo_do_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
         pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
     }
     e->ino = inode->fuse_ino;
-    lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
+
+    /* Transfer ownership of inode pointer to caller or drop it */
+    if (inodep) {
+        *inodep = inode;
+    } else {
+        lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
+    }
+
     lo_inode_put(lo, &dir);
 
     fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "  %lli/%s -> %lli\n", (unsigned long long)parent,
@@ -959,7 +972,7 @@ static void lo_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name)
         return;
     }
 
-    err = lo_do_lookup(req, parent, name, &e);
+    err = lo_do_lookup(req, parent, name, &e, NULL);
     if (err) {
         fuse_reply_err(req, err);
     } else {
@@ -1067,7 +1080,7 @@ static void lo_mknod_symlink(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent,
         goto out;
     }
 
-    saverr = lo_do_lookup(req, parent, name, &e);
+    saverr = lo_do_lookup(req, parent, name, &e, NULL);
     if (saverr) {
         goto out;
     }
@@ -1544,7 +1557,7 @@ static void lo_do_readdir(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size,
 
         if (plus) {
             if (!is_dot_or_dotdot(name)) {
-                err = lo_do_lookup(req, ino, name, &e);
+                err = lo_do_lookup(req, ino, name, &e, NULL);
                 if (err) {
                     goto error;
                 }
@@ -1742,7 +1755,7 @@ static void lo_create(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
         }
 
         fi->fh = fh;
-        err = lo_do_lookup(req, parent, name, &e);
+        err = lo_do_lookup(req, parent, name, &e, NULL);
     }
     if (lo->cache == CACHE_NONE) {
         fi->direct_io = 1;
-- 
2.27.0