qemu-kvm/kvm-virtiofsd-fix-lo_destroy-resource-leaks.patch

From 9a44d78f5019280b006bb5b3de7164336289d639 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 19:02:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 110/116] virtiofsd: fix lo_destroy() resource leaks
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

RH-Author: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20200127190227.40942-107-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 93560
O-Subject: [RHEL-AV-8.2 qemu-kvm PATCH 106/112] virtiofsd: fix lo_destroy() resource leaks
Bugzilla: 1694164
RH-Acked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@redhat.com>

From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Now that lo_destroy() is serialized we can call unref_inode() so that
all inode resources are freed.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 28f7a3b026f231bfe8de5fed6a18a8d27b1dfcee)
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
---
 tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 79b8b71..eb001b9 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -1371,26 +1371,6 @@ static void unref_inode_lolocked(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode,
     }
 }
 
-static int unref_all_inodes_cb(gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer user_data)
-{
-    struct lo_inode *inode = value;
-    struct lo_data *lo = user_data;
-
-    inode->nlookup = 0;
-    lo_map_remove(&lo->ino_map, inode->fuse_ino);
-    close(inode->fd);
-    lo_inode_put(lo, &inode); /* Drop our refcount from lo_do_lookup() */
-
-    return TRUE;
-}
-
-static void unref_all_inodes(struct lo_data *lo)
-{
-    pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex);
-    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(lo->inodes, unref_all_inodes_cb, lo);
-    pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
-}
-
 static void lo_forget_one(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, uint64_t nlookup)
 {
     struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req);
@@ -2477,7 +2457,26 @@ static void lo_lseek(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, off_t off, int whence,
 static void lo_destroy(void *userdata)
 {
     struct lo_data *lo = (struct lo_data *)userdata;
-    unref_all_inodes(lo);
+
+    /*
+     * Normally lo->mutex must be taken when traversing lo->inodes but
+     * lo_destroy() is a serialized request so no races are possible here.
+     *
+     * In addition, we cannot acquire lo->mutex since unref_inode() takes it
+     * too and this would result in a recursive lock.
+     */
+    while (true) {
+        GHashTableIter iter;
+        gpointer key, value;
+
+        g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, lo->inodes);
+        if (!g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value)) {
+            break;
+        }
+
+        struct lo_inode *inode = value;
+        unref_inode_lolocked(lo, inode, inode->nlookup);
+    }
 }
 
 static struct fuse_lowlevel_ops lo_oper = {
-- 
1.8.3.1