import python38-3.8.8-3.module+el8.5.0+12031+10ce4870

This commit is contained in:
CentOS Sources 2021-07-29 05:21:21 +00:00 committed by Andrew Lukoshko
parent 74ba38d01a
commit 261e33b983
2 changed files with 74 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
diff --git a/Doc/library/ipaddress.rst b/Doc/library/ipaddress.rst
index 2cdfddb..d464d2a 100644
--- a/Doc/library/ipaddress.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/ipaddress.rst
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ write code that handles both IP versions correctly. Address objects are
1. A string in decimal-dot notation, consisting of four decimal integers in
the inclusive range 0--255, separated by dots (e.g. ``192.168.0.1``). Each
integer represents an octet (byte) in the address. Leading zeroes are
- tolerated only for values less than 8 (as there is no ambiguity
- between the decimal and octal interpretations of such strings).
+ not tolerated to prevent confusion with octal notation.
2. An integer that fits into 32 bits.
3. An integer packed into a :class:`bytes` object of length 4 (most
significant octet first).
diff --git a/Lib/ipaddress.py b/Lib/ipaddress.py
index 28b7b61..d351f07 100644
--- a/Lib/ipaddress.py
+++ b/Lib/ipaddress.py
@@ -1173,6 +1173,11 @@ class _BaseV4:
if len(octet_str) > 3:
msg = "At most 3 characters permitted in %r"
raise ValueError(msg % octet_str)
+ # Handle leading zeros as strict as glibc's inet_pton()
+ # See security bug bpo-36384
+ if octet_str != '0' and octet_str[0] == '0':
+ msg = "Leading zeros are not permitted in %r"
+ raise ValueError(msg % octet_str)
# Convert to integer (we know digits are legal)
octet_int = int(octet_str, 10)
if octet_int > 255:
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_ipaddress.py b/Lib/test/test_ipaddress.py
index 2f1c5b6..1297b83 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_ipaddress.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_ipaddress.py
@@ -97,10 +97,23 @@ class CommonTestMixin:
class CommonTestMixin_v4(CommonTestMixin):
def test_leading_zeros(self):
- self.assertInstancesEqual("000.000.000.000", "0.0.0.0")
- self.assertInstancesEqual("192.168.000.001", "192.168.0.1")
- self.assertInstancesEqual("016.016.016.016", "16.16.16.16")
- self.assertInstancesEqual("001.000.008.016", "1.0.8.16")
+ # bpo-36384: no leading zeros to avoid ambiguity with octal notation
+ msg = "Leading zeros are not permitted in '\d+'"
+ addresses = [
+ "000.000.000.000",
+ "192.168.000.001",
+ "016.016.016.016",
+ "192.168.000.001",
+ "001.000.008.016",
+ "01.2.3.40",
+ "1.02.3.40",
+ "1.2.03.40",
+ "1.2.3.040",
+ ]
+ for address in addresses:
+ with self.subTest(address=address):
+ with self.assertAddressError(msg):
+ self.factory(address)
def test_int(self):
self.assertInstancesEqual(0, "0.0.0.0")

View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ URL: https://www.python.org/
#global prerel ...
%global upstream_version %{general_version}%{?prerel}
Version: %{general_version}%{?prerel:~%{prerel}}
Release: 2%{?dist}
Release: 3%{?dist}
License: Python
# Exclude i686 arch. Due to a modularity issue it's being added to the
@ -363,6 +363,12 @@ Patch359: 00359-CVE-2021-23336.patch
# Main BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935913
Patch360: 00360-CVE-2021-3426.patch
# 00365 #
# CVE-2021-29921: Improper input validation of octal strings in the ipaddress module
# Upstream: https://bugs.python.org/issue36384
# Main bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957458
Patch365: 00365-CVE-2021-29921.patch
# (New patches go here ^^^)
#
# When adding new patches to "python" and "python3" in Fedora, EL, etc.,
@ -712,6 +718,7 @@ rm Lib/ensurepip/_bundled/*.whl
%patch353 -p1
%patch359 -p1
%patch360 -p1
%patch365 -p1
# Remove files that should be generated by the build
# (This is after patching, so that we can use patches directly from upstream)
@ -1800,6 +1807,10 @@ fi
# ======================================================
%changelog
* Tue Jul 27 2021 Charalampos Stratakis <cstratak@redhat.com> - 3.8.8-3
- Security fix for CVE-2021-29921: Leading zeros in IPv4 addresses are no longer tolerated
Resolves: rhbz#1957458
* Fri Apr 30 2021 Charalampos Stratakis <cstratak@redhat.com> - 3.8.8-2
- Security fix for CVE-2021-3426: information disclosure via pydoc
Resolves: rhbz#1935913