python-dateutil/.gitignore

/noarch/
/.build-*.fc*.log
/python-dateutil-*.fc*.src.rpm
/python-dateutil-1.4.1.tar.gz
/python-dateutil-1.5.tar.gz
/python-dateutil-2.2.tar.gz
/2.4.0.tar.gz
/2.4.2.tar.gz
/python-dateutil-2.5.0.tar.gz
/dateutil-2.5.2.tar.gz
/python-dateutil-2.5.3.tar.xz
/dateutil-2.5.3.tar.gz
Add stuff that fedpkg generates to gitignore 2016-02-05 23:14:45 +00:00			`/noarch/`
			`/.build-.fc.log`
			`/python-dateutil-.fc.src.rpm`
			`/python-dateutil-1.4.1.tar.gz`
new upstream release source 2011-07-12 23:26:29 +00:00			`/python-dateutil-1.5.tar.gz`
2.2 2014-08-04 17:04:21 +00:00			`/python-dateutil-2.2.tar.gz`
Update to 2.4 2015-01-21 17:12:23 +00:00			`/2.4.0.tar.gz`
Update to latest upstream release 2015-04-06 16:12:47 +00:00			`/2.4.2.tar.gz`
Update to 2.5.0 Patch1 is not necessary, issue was fixed upstream in a different way. Patch0 is dropped, because upstream recommends usings a different function, and I don't want to keep updating this local patch. If there are problems cause by dropping this patch, we can either fix the users or restore it. 2016-02-29 00:39:08 +00:00			`/python-dateutil-2.5.0.tar.gz`
Update to 2.5.2; Adopt for new packaging guidelines Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@redhat.com> 2016-04-09 13:56:22 +00:00			`/dateutil-2.5.2.tar.gz`
Update to 2.5.3 2016-05-05 01:43:01 +00:00			`/python-dateutil-2.5.3.tar.xz`
Revert "Check tarball signature" This reverts commit fe0bb31af7afe741fe3464f89d70a62524b2269d and 62b41f900315681f6e84c42e8e98908657f5e607. It turns out that the signed tarball is missing documentation. 2016-05-05 02:43:32 +00:00			`/dateutil-2.5.3.tar.gz`