When extension modules are built in %pyproject_buildrequires,
we need to create the package note file.
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097535
This is tested via python-ldap -- %pyproject_buildrequires -w fails without the fix.
Neither python-markupsafe nor python-mistune can be used as a test
because they only warn when the extension module cannot be built
because they fallback to pure Python.
Compressed manpages have different extension than those listed in the RECORD file,
so they were not recognized when %%pyproject_save_files '+auto' flag
was provided.
To enable the path recognition, if the manpage extension matches the one
listed in brp-compres, the extension is removed, and an asterisk is now added
to the manpages filenames.
Source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_manpages
Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2033254
%%pyproject_save_files newly saves also a list of importable modules.
The list is used by %%pyproject_check_import to invoke the import test
on each module name.
%%pyproject_check_import accepts two options:
-t: filter only top-level modules
-e: exclude module names matching the given glob from the import check
%pyproject_buildrequires macro now accepts multiple file names to load
additional dependencies from them.
New option -N was added to disable automatical generation of requirements
in case package does not use build system. Option -N cannot be used in
combination with options -r, -e, -t, -x.
Co-authored-by: Miro Hrončok <miro@hroncok.cz>
This allows users to do:
%build
cd somewhere
%pyproject_wheel
cd -
cd somewhere_else
%pyproject_wheel
cd -
%install
%pyproject_install
Without a need to copy paste the wheels to a common location.
This is in fact a breaking change, I'll make sure to adapt the affected packages in Fedora.
This is done to avoid troubles with %lang files listed as duplicated.
1. It gets rid of a warning
2. It fixes a problem described in:
http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/2020-November/002041.html
This is a backwards incompatible change,
packages that rename or remove the installed files after %pyproject_install
might no longer be compatible with %pyproject_save_files.
Previously, we have used `grep -v` to assert something is *not* there.
However, that doesn't work. See for example this file:
$ cat TEST
line1
line2
line3
$ grep -v line4 TEST
line1
line2
line3
$ echo $?
0
This gives a false sense of correctness, however it exits will 0 with anything:
$ grep -v line3 TEST
line1
line2
$ echo $?
0
Instead, we use `! grep` now:
$ ! grep line4 TEST
$ echo $?
0
$ ! grep line3 TEST
line3
$ echo $?
1
Additionally, remove a trailing slash from one of the checks to match both cases
(with or without the slash).
The PEP 517 shows an example backend-path like this:
[build-system]
# Defined by PEP 518:
requires = ["flit"]
# Defined by this PEP:
build-backend = "local_backend"
backend-path = ["backend"]
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0517/#source-trees
See that backend-path is a list. Our code previously only supported string path.
Obviously a string path is wrong, but we keep it to support projects that have
made the mistake, such as flit-core.
Add a small integration test for both cases.
Note that the new spec files deliberately don't do much, to save CI time.
