When certain modules are deliberately not included into the built RPM,
they shouldn't be listed in the list of qualified module names which are
used by %pyproject_check_import to test importability of the
distribution.
Related: rhbz#2168193
Files still need to be marked as License-File to be considered %license,
but if their path in METADATA is specified relative to dist-info/licenses,
they are correctly recognised.
This makes License-Files specified by hatchling 1.9.0+ marked as %license.
Related: rhbz#2168193
Users invoking %pyproject_save_files with glob: '*' don't care about the
files in the Python package, hence it shouldn't error when no modules
are detected.
There may be legitimate reasons to create a package without Python
modules in it, hence we shouldn't be blocking this possibility.
Related: rhbz#2117571
Compressed manpages have different extension than those listed in the RECORD file,
so they were not recognized when %%pyproject_save_files '+auto' flag
was provided.
To enable the path recognition, if the manpage extension matches the one
listed in brp-compres, the extension is removed, and an asterisk is now added
to the manpages filenames.
Source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_manpages
Related: rhbz#1950291
%%pyproject_save_files newly saves also a list of importable modules.
The list is used by %%pyproject_check_import to invoke the import test
on each module name.
%%pyproject_check_import accepts two options:
-t: filter only top-level modules
-e: exclude module names matching the given glob from the import check
Related: rhbz#1950291
