rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

PEP 639 is provisional, no longer a draft

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Miro Hrončok 2024-11-03 10:00:34 +01:00
parent bc6cb55227
commit beceb2c94b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md
View File

@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ However, in Fedora packages, always list executables explicitly to avoid uninten
`%pyproject_save_files` can automatically mark license files with `%license` macro `%pyproject_save_files` can automatically mark license files with `%license` macro
and language (`*.mo`) files with `%lang` macro and appropriate language code. and language (`*.mo`) files with `%lang` macro and appropriate language code.
Only license files declared via [PEP 639] `License-File` field are detected. Only license files declared via [PEP 639] `License-File` field are detected.
[PEP 639] is still a draft and can be changed in the future. [PEP 639] is still provisional and can be changed in the future.
It is possible to use the `-l` flag to declare that a missing license should It is possible to use the `-l` flag to declare that a missing license should
terminate the build or `-L` (the default) to explicitly disable this check. terminate the build or `-L` (the default) to explicitly disable this check.
Packagers are encouraged to use the `-l` flag when the `%license` file is not manually listed in `%files` Packagers are encouraged to use the `-l` flag when the `%license` file is not manually listed in `%files`