policycoreutils/SOURCES/0040-policycoreutils-setfil...

70 lines
2.9 KiB
Diff

From d10e773c014a12b17fefd9caef0bd02528d75d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:35:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] policycoreutils: setfiles: do not restrict checks against a
binary policy
The -c option allows to check the validity of contexts against a
specified binary policy. Its use is restricted: no pathname can be used
when a binary policy is given to setfiles. It's not clear if this is
intentional as the built-in help and the man page are not stating the
same thing about this (the man page document -c as a normal option,
while the built-in help shows it is restricted).
When generating full system images later used with SELinux in enforcing
mode, the extended attributed of files have to be set by the build
machine. The issue is setfiles always checks the contexts against a
policy (ctx_validate = 1) and using an external binary policy is not
currently possible when using a pathname. This ends up in setfiles
failing early as the contexts of the target image are not always
compatible with the ones of the build machine.
This patch reworks a check on optind only made when -c is used, that
enforced the use of a single argument to allow 1+ arguments, allowing to
use setfiles with an external binary policy and pathnames. The following
command is then allowed, as already documented in the man page:
$ setfiles -m -r target/ -c policy.32 file_contexts target/
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
(cherry-picked from SElinuxProject
commit: c94e542c98da2f26863c1cbd9d7ad9bc5cca6aff )
---
policycoreutils/setfiles/setfiles.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policycoreutils/setfiles/setfiles.c b/policycoreutils/setfiles/setfiles.c
index 82d0aaa7..4fd3d756 100644
--- a/policycoreutils/setfiles/setfiles.c
+++ b/policycoreutils/setfiles/setfiles.c
@@ -39,11 +39,10 @@ static __attribute__((__noreturn__)) void usage(const char *const name)
name, name);
} else {
fprintf(stderr,
- "usage: %s [-diIDlmnpqvFW] [-e excludedir] [-r alt_root_path] spec_file pathname...\n"
- "usage: %s [-diIDlmnpqvFW] [-e excludedir] [-r alt_root_path] spec_file -f filename\n"
- "usage: %s -s [-diIDlmnpqvFW] spec_file\n"
- "usage: %s -c policyfile spec_file\n",
- name, name, name, name);
+ "usage: %s [-diIDlmnpqvEFW] [-e excludedir] [-r alt_root_path] [-c policyfile] spec_file pathname...\n"
+ "usage: %s [-diIDlmnpqvEFW] [-e excludedir] [-r alt_root_path] [-c policyfile] spec_file -f filename\n"
+ "usage: %s -s [-diIDlmnpqvFW] spec_file\n",
+ name, name, name);
}
exit(-1);
}
@@ -376,7 +375,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (!iamrestorecon) {
if (policyfile) {
- if (optind != (argc - 1))
+ if (optind > (argc - 1))
usage(argv[0]);
} else if (use_input_file) {
if (optind != (argc - 1)) {
--
2.30.2