perl/perl-5.29.6-PATCH-perl-133756-Failure-to-match-properly.patch

175 lines
8.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From 739762602079d68c47cbde3b29275e844d0c92ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karl Williamson <khw@cpan.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:59:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] PATCH: [perl #133756] Failure to match properly
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This was caused by a counting error.
An EXACTFish regnode has a finite length it can hold for the string
being matched. If that length is exceeded, a 2nd node is used for the
next segment of the string, for as many regnodes as are needed.
A problem occurs if a regnode ends with one of the 22 characters in
Unicode 11 that occur in non-final positions of a multi-character fold.
The design of the pattern matching engine doesn't allow matches across
regnodes. Consider, for example if a node ended in the letter 'f' and
the next node begins with the letter 'i'. That sequence should match,
under /i, the ligature "fi" (U+FB01). But it wouldn't because the
pattern splits them across nodes. The solution I adopted was to forbid
a node to end with one of those 22 characters if there is another string
node that follows it. This is not fool proof, for example, if the
entire node consisted of only these characters, one would have to split
it at some position (In that case, we just take as much of the string as
will fit.) But for real life applications, it is good enough.
What happens if a node ends with one of the 22, is that the node is
shortened so that those are instead placed at the beginning of the
following node. When the code encounters this situation, it backs off
until it finds a character that isn't a non-final fold one, and closes
the node with that one.
A /i node is filled with the fold of the input, for several reasons.
The most obvious is that it saves time, you can skip folding the pattern
at runtime. But there are reasons based on the design of the optimzer
as well, which I won't go into here, but are documented in regcomp.c.
When we back out the final characters in a node, we also have to back
out the corresponding unfolded characters in the input, so that those
can be (folded) into the following node. Since the number of characters
in the fold may not be the same as unfolded, there is not an easily
discernable correspondence between the input and the folded output.
That means that generally, what has to be done is that the input is
reparsed from the beginning of the node, but the permitted length has
been shortened (we know precisely how much to shorten it to) so that it
will end with something other than the 22. But, the code saves the
previous input character's position (for other reasons), so if we only
have to backup one character, we can just use that and not have to
reparse.
This bug was that the code thought a two character backup was really a
one character one, and did not reparse the node, creating an off-by-one
error, and a character was simply omitted in the pattern (that should
have started the following node). And the input had two of the 22
characters adjacent to each other in just the right positions that the
node was split. The bisect showed that when the node size was changed
the bug went away, at least for this particular input string. But a
different, longer, string would have triggered the bug, and this commit
fixes that.
This bug is actually very unlikely to occur in most real world
applications. That is because other changes in the regex compiler have
caused nodes to be split so that things that don't particpate in folds
at all are separated out into EXACT nodes. (The reason for that is it
allows the optimizer things to grab on to under /i that it wouldn't
otherwise have known about.) That means that anything like this string
would never cause the bug to happen because blanks and commas, etc.
would be in separate nodes, and so no node would ever get large enough
to fill the 238 available byte slots in a node (235 on EBCDIC). Only a
long string without punctuation would trigger it. I have artificially
constructed such a string in the tests added by this commit.
One of the 22 characters is 't', so long strings of DNA "ACTG" could
trigger this bug. I find it somewhat amusing that this is something
like a DNA transcription error, which occurs in nature at very low
rates, but selection, it is believed, will make sure the error rate is
above zero.
Signed-off-by: Petr Písař <ppisar@redhat.com>
---
regcomp.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
t/re/pat_advanced.t | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/regcomp.c b/regcomp.c
index 56b83f964a..58cb941b06 100644
--- a/regcomp.c
+++ b/regcomp.c
@@ -14377,6 +14377,7 @@ S_regatom(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, I32 *flagp, U32 depth)
* identifies, so when it is set to less than the full node, we can
* skip the rest of this */
if (FOLD && p < RExC_end && upper_parse == MAX_NODE_STRING_SIZE) {
+ PERL_UINT_FAST8_T backup_count = 0;
const STRLEN full_len = len;
@@ -14393,7 +14394,9 @@ S_regatom(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, I32 *flagp, U32 depth)
goto loopdone;
}
- while (--s >= s0 && IS_NON_FINAL_FOLD(*s)) { }
+ while (--s >= s0 && IS_NON_FINAL_FOLD(*s)) {
+ backup_count++;
+ }
len = s - s0 + 1;
}
else {
@@ -14435,6 +14438,7 @@ S_regatom(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, I32 *flagp, U32 depth)
* special case the very first byte in the string, so
* we don't read outside the string */
s = (s == s0) ? s -1 : (char *) utf8_hop((U8 *) s, -1);
+ backup_count++;
} /* End of loop backwards through the string */
/* If there were only problematic characters in the string,
@@ -14458,12 +14462,13 @@ S_regatom(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, I32 *flagp, U32 depth)
} else {
/* Here, the node does contain some characters that aren't
- * problematic. If one such is the final character in the
- * node, we are done */
- if (len == full_len) {
+ * problematic. If we didn't have to backup any, then the
+ * final character in the node is non-problematic, and we
+ * can take the node as-is */
+ if (backup_count == 0) {
goto loopdone;
}
- else if (len + ((UTF) ? UTF8SKIP(s) : 1) == full_len) {
+ else if (backup_count == 1) {
/* If the final character is problematic, but the
* penultimate is not, back-off that last character to
diff --git a/t/re/pat_advanced.t b/t/re/pat_advanced.t
index d90ceeb5bd..ade8b1587a 100644
--- a/t/re/pat_advanced.t
+++ b/t/re/pat_advanced.t
@@ -2176,6 +2176,33 @@ EOP
}
}
ok(! $failed, "Matched multi-char fold 'ss' across EXACTF node boundaries; if failed, was at count $failed");
+
+ for my $non_finals ("t", "ft", "ift", "sift") {
+ my $base_pat = $non_finals . "enKalt"; # (The tail is taken from
+ # the trouble ticket, is
+ # arbitrary)
+ for my $utf8 ("non-UTF-8", "UTF-8") {
+
+ # Try at different lengths to be sure to get a node boundary
+ for my $repeat (120 .. 270) { # [perl #133756]
+ my $head = ("b" x $repeat) . "\xDC";
+ my $pat = $base_pat;
+ utf8::upgrade($pat) if $utf8 eq "UTF-8";
+ $pat = $head . $pat;
+ my $text = $head . $base_pat;
+
+ if ($text !~ /$pat/i) {
+ $failed = $repeat;
+ last;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ok(! $failed, "A non-final fold character "
+ . (length($non_finals) - 1)
+ . " characters from the end of an EXACTFish"
+ . " $utf8 pattern works; if failed, was at count $failed");
+ }
+ }
}
{
--
2.17.2