Compare commits

...

No commits in common. "c8s" and "c8" have entirely different histories.
c8s ... c8

11 changed files with 3 additions and 472 deletions

View File

@ -1 +0,0 @@
1

24
.gitignore vendored
View File

@ -1,23 +1 @@
SOURCES/osbuild-composer-75.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-75.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-77.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-79.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-80.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-82.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-84.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-85.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-86.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-87.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-88.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-89.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-90.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-91.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-92.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-93.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-94.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-95.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-96.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-98.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-99.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-100.tar.gz
/osbuild-composer-101.tar.gz
SOURCES/osbuild-composer-101.tar.gz

View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
0feb86b5dcd146ce5b87816ae482eb50ed507c16 SOURCES/osbuild-composer-101.tar.gz

View File

@ -1,391 +0,0 @@
diff --git a/go.mod b/go.mod
index f571516..d3d329f 100644
--- a/go.mod
+++ b/go.mod
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ require (
github.com/getkin/kin-openapi v0.93.0
github.com/getsentry/sentry-go v0.26.0
github.com/gobwas/glob v0.2.3
- github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.0
+ github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.2
github.com/google/go-cmp v0.6.0
github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0
github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud v1.9.0
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ require (
github.com/go-openapi/validate v0.22.1 // indirect
github.com/gogo/protobuf v1.3.2 // indirect
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt v3.2.2+incompatible // indirect
- github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.0 // indirect
+ github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.2 // indirect
github.com/golang/glog v1.1.2 // indirect
github.com/golang/groupcache v0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9da // indirect
github.com/golang/protobuf v1.5.3 // indirect
diff --git a/go.sum b/go.sum
index 5996751..488870b 100644
--- a/go.sum
+++ b/go.sum
@@ -251,10 +251,11 @@ github.com/golang-jwt/jwt v3.2.2+incompatible h1:IfV12K8xAKAnZqdXVzCZ+TOjboZ2keL
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt v3.2.2+incompatible/go.mod h1:8pz2t5EyA70fFQQSrl6XZXzqecmYZeUEB8OUGHkxJ+I=
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.0.0/go.mod h1:/xlHOz8bRuivTWchD4jCa+NbatV+wEUSzwAxVc6locg=
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.2.0/go.mod h1:/xlHOz8bRuivTWchD4jCa+NbatV+wEUSzwAxVc6locg=
-github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.0 h1:7cYmW1XlMY7h7ii7UhUyChSgS5wUJEnm9uZVTGqOWzg=
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.0/go.mod h1:m21LjoU+eqJr34lmDMbreY2eSTRJ1cv77w39/MY0Ch0=
-github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.0 h1:d/ix8ftRUorsN+5eMIlF4T6J8CAt9rch3My2winC1Jw=
-github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.0/go.mod h1:pqrtFR0X4osieyHYxtmOUWsAWrfe1Q5UVIyoH402zdk=
+github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.2 h1:YtQM7lnr8iZ+j5q71MGKkNw9Mn7AjHM68uc9g5fXeUI=
+github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.2/go.mod h1:m21LjoU+eqJr34lmDMbreY2eSTRJ1cv77w39/MY0Ch0=
+github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.2 h1:Rl4B7itRWVtYIHFrSNd7vhTiz9UpLdi6gZhZ3wEeDy8=
+github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.2/go.mod h1:pqrtFR0X4osieyHYxtmOUWsAWrfe1Q5UVIyoH402zdk=
github.com/golang/glog v0.0.0-20160126235308-23def4e6c14b/go.mod h1:SBH7ygxi8pfUlaOkMMuAQtPIUF8ecWP5IEl/CR7VP2Q=
github.com/golang/glog v1.1.2 h1:DVjP2PbBOzHyzA+dn3WhHIq4NdVu3Q+pvivFICf/7fo=
github.com/golang/glog v1.1.2/go.mod h1:zR+okUeTbrL6EL3xHUDxZuEtGv04p5shwip1+mL/rLQ=
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4/parser.go b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4/parser.go
index c0a6f69..0fc510a 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4/parser.go
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4/parser.go
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ import (
"strings"
)
+const tokenDelimiter = "."
+
type Parser struct {
// If populated, only these methods will be considered valid.
//
@@ -36,19 +38,21 @@ func NewParser(options ...ParserOption) *Parser {
return p
}
-// Parse parses, validates, verifies the signature and returns the parsed token.
-// keyFunc will receive the parsed token and should return the key for validating.
+// Parse parses, validates, verifies the signature and returns the parsed token. keyFunc will
+// receive the parsed token and should return the key for validating.
func (p *Parser) Parse(tokenString string, keyFunc Keyfunc) (*Token, error) {
return p.ParseWithClaims(tokenString, MapClaims{}, keyFunc)
}
-// ParseWithClaims parses, validates, and verifies like Parse, but supplies a default object implementing the Claims
-// interface. This provides default values which can be overridden and allows a caller to use their own type, rather
-// than the default MapClaims implementation of Claims.
+// ParseWithClaims parses, validates, and verifies like Parse, but supplies a default object
+// implementing the Claims interface. This provides default values which can be overridden and
+// allows a caller to use their own type, rather than the default MapClaims implementation of
+// Claims.
//
-// Note: If you provide a custom claim implementation that embeds one of the standard claims (such as RegisteredClaims),
-// make sure that a) you either embed a non-pointer version of the claims or b) if you are using a pointer, allocate the
-// proper memory for it before passing in the overall claims, otherwise you might run into a panic.
+// Note: If you provide a custom claim implementation that embeds one of the standard claims (such
+// as RegisteredClaims), make sure that a) you either embed a non-pointer version of the claims or
+// b) if you are using a pointer, allocate the proper memory for it before passing in the overall
+// claims, otherwise you might run into a panic.
func (p *Parser) ParseWithClaims(tokenString string, claims Claims, keyFunc Keyfunc) (*Token, error) {
token, parts, err := p.ParseUnverified(tokenString, claims)
if err != nil {
@@ -85,12 +89,17 @@ func (p *Parser) ParseWithClaims(tokenString string, claims Claims, keyFunc Keyf
return token, &ValidationError{Inner: err, Errors: ValidationErrorUnverifiable}
}
+ // Perform validation
+ token.Signature = parts[2]
+ if err := token.Method.Verify(strings.Join(parts[0:2], "."), token.Signature, key); err != nil {
+ return token, &ValidationError{Inner: err, Errors: ValidationErrorSignatureInvalid}
+ }
+
vErr := &ValidationError{}
// Validate Claims
if !p.SkipClaimsValidation {
if err := token.Claims.Valid(); err != nil {
-
// If the Claims Valid returned an error, check if it is a validation error,
// If it was another error type, create a ValidationError with a generic ClaimsInvalid flag set
if e, ok := err.(*ValidationError); !ok {
@@ -98,22 +107,14 @@ func (p *Parser) ParseWithClaims(tokenString string, claims Claims, keyFunc Keyf
} else {
vErr = e
}
+ return token, vErr
}
}
- // Perform validation
- token.Signature = parts[2]
- if err = token.Method.Verify(strings.Join(parts[0:2], "."), token.Signature, key); err != nil {
- vErr.Inner = err
- vErr.Errors |= ValidationErrorSignatureInvalid
- }
-
- if vErr.valid() {
- token.Valid = true
- return token, nil
- }
+ // No errors so far, token is valid.
+ token.Valid = true
- return token, vErr
+ return token, nil
}
// ParseUnverified parses the token but doesn't validate the signature.
@@ -123,9 +124,10 @@ func (p *Parser) ParseWithClaims(tokenString string, claims Claims, keyFunc Keyf
// It's only ever useful in cases where you know the signature is valid (because it has
// been checked previously in the stack) and you want to extract values from it.
func (p *Parser) ParseUnverified(tokenString string, claims Claims) (token *Token, parts []string, err error) {
- parts = strings.Split(tokenString, ".")
- if len(parts) != 3 {
- return nil, parts, NewValidationError("token contains an invalid number of segments", ValidationErrorMalformed)
+ var ok bool
+ parts, ok = splitToken(tokenString)
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, nil, NewValidationError("token contains an invalid number of segments", ValidationErrorMalformed)
}
token = &Token{Raw: tokenString}
@@ -175,3 +177,30 @@ func (p *Parser) ParseUnverified(tokenString string, claims Claims) (token *Toke
return token, parts, nil
}
+
+// splitToken splits a token string into three parts: header, claims, and signature. It will only
+// return true if the token contains exactly two delimiters and three parts. In all other cases, it
+// will return nil parts and false.
+func splitToken(token string) ([]string, bool) {
+ parts := make([]string, 3)
+ header, remain, ok := strings.Cut(token, tokenDelimiter)
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, false
+ }
+ parts[0] = header
+ claims, remain, ok := strings.Cut(remain, tokenDelimiter)
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, false
+ }
+ parts[1] = claims
+ // One more cut to ensure the signature is the last part of the token and there are no more
+ // delimiters. This avoids an issue where malicious input could contain additional delimiters
+ // causing unecessary overhead parsing tokens.
+ signature, _, unexpected := strings.Cut(remain, tokenDelimiter)
+ if unexpected {
+ return nil, false
+ }
+ parts[2] = signature
+
+ return parts, true
+}
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/README.md b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/README.md
index 964598a..0bb636f 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/README.md
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/README.md
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ implementation of [JSON Web
Tokens](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519).
Starting with [v4.0.0](https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/releases/tag/v4.0.0)
-this project adds Go module support, but maintains backwards compatibility with
+this project adds Go module support, but maintains backward compatibility with
older `v3.x.y` tags and upstream `github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go`. See the
[`MIGRATION_GUIDE.md`](./MIGRATION_GUIDE.md) for more information. Version
v5.0.0 introduces major improvements to the validation of tokens, but is not
-entirely backwards compatible.
+entirely backward compatible.
> After the original author of the library suggested migrating the maintenance
> of `jwt-go`, a dedicated team of open source maintainers decided to clone the
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ entirely backwards compatible.
**SECURITY NOTICE:** Some older versions of Go have a security issue in the
-crypto/elliptic. Recommendation is to upgrade to at least 1.15 See issue
+crypto/elliptic. The recommendation is to upgrade to at least 1.15 See issue
[dgrijalva/jwt-go#216](https://github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go/issues/216) for more
detail.
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ detail.
what you
expect](https://auth0.com/blog/critical-vulnerabilities-in-json-web-token-libraries/).
This library attempts to make it easy to do the right thing by requiring key
-types match the expected alg, but you should take the extra step to verify it in
+types to match the expected alg, but you should take the extra step to verify it in
your usage. See the examples provided.
### Supported Go versions
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Our support of Go versions is aligned with Go's [version release
policy](https://golang.org/doc/devel/release#policy). So we will support a major
version of Go until there are two newer major releases. We no longer support
building jwt-go with unsupported Go versions, as these contain security
-vulnerabilities which will not be fixed.
+vulnerabilities that will not be fixed.
## What the heck is a JWT?
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ notable differences:
This library is considered production ready. Feedback and feature requests are
appreciated. The API should be considered stable. There should be very few
-backwards-incompatible changes outside of major version updates (and only with
+backward-incompatible changes outside of major version updates (and only with
good reason).
This project uses [Semantic Versioning 2.0.0](http://semver.org). Accepted pull
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ requests will land on `main`. Periodically, versions will be tagged from
`main`. You can find all the releases on [the project releases
page](https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/releases).
-**BREAKING CHANGES:*** A full list of breaking changes is available in
-`VERSION_HISTORY.md`. See `MIGRATION_GUIDE.md` for more information on updating
+**BREAKING CHANGES:** A full list of breaking changes is available in
+`VERSION_HISTORY.md`. See [`MIGRATION_GUIDE.md`](./MIGRATION_GUIDE.md) for more information on updating
your code.
## Extensions
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/SECURITY.md b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/SECURITY.md
index b08402c..2740597 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/SECURITY.md
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/SECURITY.md
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
## Supported Versions
-As of February 2022 (and until this document is updated), the latest version `v4` is supported.
+As of November 2024 (and until this document is updated), the latest version `v5` is supported. In critical cases, we might supply back-ported patches for `v4`.
## Reporting a Vulnerability
-If you think you found a vulnerability, and even if you are not sure, please report it to jwt-go-security@googlegroups.com or one of the other [golang-jwt maintainers](https://github.com/orgs/golang-jwt/people). Please try be explicit, describe steps to reproduce the security issue with code example(s).
+If you think you found a vulnerability, and even if you are not sure, please report it a [GitHub Security Advisory](https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/security/advisories/new). Please try be explicit, describe steps to reproduce the security issue with code example(s).
You will receive a response within a timely manner. If the issue is confirmed, we will do our best to release a patch as soon as possible given the complexity of the problem.
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/ecdsa.go b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/ecdsa.go
index ca85659..c929e4a 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/ecdsa.go
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/ecdsa.go
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ func (m *SigningMethodECDSA) Verify(signingString string, sig []byte, key interf
case *ecdsa.PublicKey:
ecdsaKey = k
default:
- return newError("ECDSA verify expects *ecsda.PublicKey", ErrInvalidKeyType)
+ return newError("ECDSA verify expects *ecdsa.PublicKey", ErrInvalidKeyType)
}
if len(sig) != 2*m.KeySize {
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ func (m *SigningMethodECDSA) Sign(signingString string, key interface{}) ([]byte
case *ecdsa.PrivateKey:
ecdsaKey = k
default:
- return nil, newError("ECDSA sign expects *ecsda.PrivateKey", ErrInvalidKeyType)
+ return nil, newError("ECDSA sign expects *ecdsa.PrivateKey", ErrInvalidKeyType)
}
// Create the hasher
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/hmac.go b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/hmac.go
index 96c6272..aca600c 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/hmac.go
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/hmac.go
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ func (m *SigningMethodHMAC) Verify(signingString string, sig []byte, key interfa
func (m *SigningMethodHMAC) Sign(signingString string, key interface{}) ([]byte, error) {
if keyBytes, ok := key.([]byte); ok {
if !m.Hash.Available() {
- return nil, newError("HMAC sign expects []byte", ErrInvalidKeyType)
+ return nil, ErrHashUnavailable
}
hasher := hmac.New(m.Hash.New, keyBytes)
@@ -100,5 +100,5 @@ func (m *SigningMethodHMAC) Sign(signingString string, key interface{}) ([]byte,
return hasher.Sum(nil), nil
}
- return nil, ErrInvalidKeyType
+ return nil, newError("HMAC sign expects []byte", ErrInvalidKeyType)
}
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/parser.go b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/parser.go
index ecf99af..054c7eb 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/parser.go
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/parser.go
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ import (
"strings"
)
+const tokenDelimiter = "."
+
type Parser struct {
// If populated, only these methods will be considered valid.
validMethods []string
@@ -136,9 +138,10 @@ func (p *Parser) ParseWithClaims(tokenString string, claims Claims, keyFunc Keyf
// It's only ever useful in cases where you know the signature is valid (since it has already
// been or will be checked elsewhere in the stack) and you want to extract values from it.
func (p *Parser) ParseUnverified(tokenString string, claims Claims) (token *Token, parts []string, err error) {
- parts = strings.Split(tokenString, ".")
- if len(parts) != 3 {
- return nil, parts, newError("token contains an invalid number of segments", ErrTokenMalformed)
+ var ok bool
+ parts, ok = splitToken(tokenString)
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, nil, newError("token contains an invalid number of segments", ErrTokenMalformed)
}
token = &Token{Raw: tokenString}
@@ -196,6 +199,33 @@ func (p *Parser) ParseUnverified(tokenString string, claims Claims) (token *Toke
return token, parts, nil
}
+// splitToken splits a token string into three parts: header, claims, and signature. It will only
+// return true if the token contains exactly two delimiters and three parts. In all other cases, it
+// will return nil parts and false.
+func splitToken(token string) ([]string, bool) {
+ parts := make([]string, 3)
+ header, remain, ok := strings.Cut(token, tokenDelimiter)
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, false
+ }
+ parts[0] = header
+ claims, remain, ok := strings.Cut(remain, tokenDelimiter)
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, false
+ }
+ parts[1] = claims
+ // One more cut to ensure the signature is the last part of the token and there are no more
+ // delimiters. This avoids an issue where malicious input could contain additional delimiters
+ // causing unecessary overhead parsing tokens.
+ signature, _, unexpected := strings.Cut(remain, tokenDelimiter)
+ if unexpected {
+ return nil, false
+ }
+ parts[2] = signature
+
+ return parts, true
+}
+
// DecodeSegment decodes a JWT specific base64url encoding. This function will
// take into account whether the [Parser] is configured with additional options,
// such as [WithStrictDecoding] or [WithPaddingAllowed].
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/token.go b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/token.go
index 352873a..9c7f4ab 100644
--- a/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/token.go
+++ b/vendor/github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5/token.go
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ func (t *Token) SignedString(key interface{}) (string, error) {
}
// SigningString generates the signing string. This is the most expensive part
-// of the whole deal. Unless you need this for something special, just go
+// of the whole deal. Unless you need this for something special, just go
// straight for the SignedString.
func (t *Token) SigningString() (string, error) {
h, err := json.Marshal(t.Header)
diff --git a/vendor/modules.txt b/vendor/modules.txt
index 35d0433..f49c006 100644
--- a/vendor/modules.txt
+++ b/vendor/modules.txt
@@ -568,10 +568,10 @@ github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto
# github.com/golang-jwt/jwt v3.2.2+incompatible
## explicit
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt
-# github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.0
+# github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 v4.5.2
## explicit; go 1.16
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4
-# github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.0
+# github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 v5.2.2
## explicit; go 1.18
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5
# github.com/golang/glog v1.1.2

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ It is compatible with composer-cli and cockpit-composer clients.
}
Name: osbuild-composer
Release: 3%{?dist}
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: An image building service based on osbuild
# osbuild-composer doesn't have support for building i686 and armv7hl images
@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ License: Apache-2.0
URL: %{gourl}
Source0: %{gosource}
Patch0: CVE-2025-30204.patch
BuildRequires: %{?go_compiler:compiler(go-compiler)}%{!?go_compiler:golang}
BuildRequires: systemd
@ -423,16 +422,6 @@ Integration tests to be run on a pristine-dedicated system to test the osbuild-c
%endif
%changelog
* Tue Apr 22 2025 Tomáš Hozza <thozza@redhat.com> - 101-3
- Resolve RHEL-84643 (CVE-2025-30204)
* Wed Sep 25 2024 Tomáš Hozza <thozza@redhat.com> - 101-2
- Rebuilt to fix:
- CVE-2024-34156
- CVE-2024-1394
- RHEL-24303
- RHEL-57905
* Mon Feb 26 2024 imagebuilder-bot <imagebuilder-bots+imagebuilder-bot@redhat.com> - 101-1
- New upstream release

View File

@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
--- !Policy
product_versions:
- rhel-8
decision_context: osci_compose_gate
rules:
- !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: osci.brew-build.tier0.functional}

View File

@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
summary: Run integration tests
prepare:
how: install
package:
- osbuild-composer-tests
execute:
script: ./tests/scripts/run_tests.sh ./tests/
duration: 24h

View File

@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
summary: Run unit tests from source
discover:
how: fmf
dist-git-source: true
execute:
how: tmt

View File

@ -1 +0,0 @@
SHA512 (osbuild-composer-101.tar.gz) = f2df537865464cbf3eb2d37b5637797ad47d540784ff066fb2108ea44c941363967862b893fd7c72b6338597c880def4786ba4c552fc5b53ea868a1a341fff39

View File

@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
#!/bin/bash
set -euxo pipefail
TOPDIR=$1
# Print some information about the machine
df -h
free -h
rpm -qa
find /etc/yum.repos.d -type f -print -exec cat {} \;
# Run only basic smoke tests.
# Our test-suite is currently very thorough and it builds a lot of images.
# On some runs, TFT was able to build one image for 25 minutes. Our test
# suite builds more than 25 images which means that the full test-suite
# can run for more than 10 hours. That's just too slow and since we are also
# able to run downstream tests on our much faster upstream infrastructure.
# I think that it's enough to do just smoke tests here.
/usr/libexec/tests/osbuild-composer/base_tests.sh || cat /var/lib/osbuild-composer/jobs/*

View File

@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
summary: Run unit tests
require:
- golang
test: cd ../osbuild-composer-*/ && sudo dnf builddep -y osbuild-composer.spec && GOFLAGS="-mod=vendor -tags=exclude_graphdriver_btrfs" go test ./...
duration: 1h