Strict certificates validation shouldn't allow explicit EC parameters

Related: rhbz#2058663
This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Belyavskiy 2022-06-22 12:52:57 +02:00
parent ea75c725ee
commit fea833cb56
3 changed files with 146 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
diff --git a/crypto/ec/ec_backend.c b/crypto/ec/ec_backend.c
index bea01fb38f66..48721369ae8f 100644
--- a/crypto/ec/ec_backend.c
+++ b/crypto/ec/ec_backend.c
@@ -318,6 +318,11 @@ int ossl_ec_group_todata(const EC_GROUP *group, OSSL_PARAM_BLD *tmpl,
return 0;
}
+ if (!ossl_param_build_set_int(tmpl, params,
+ OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_DECODED_FROM_EXPLICIT_PARAMS,
+ group->decoded_from_explicit_params))
+ return 0;
+
curve_nid = EC_GROUP_get_curve_name(group);
/*
diff --git a/crypto/ec/ec_lib.c b/crypto/ec/ec_lib.c
index 6b0591c6c8c7..b1696d93bd6d 100644
--- a/crypto/ec/ec_lib.c
+++ b/crypto/ec/ec_lib.c
@@ -1556,13 +1556,23 @@ EC_GROUP *EC_GROUP_new_from_params(const OSSL_PARAM params[],
/* This is the simple named group case */
ptmp = OSSL_PARAM_locate_const(params, OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_GROUP_NAME);
if (ptmp != NULL) {
- group = group_new_from_name(ptmp, libctx, propq);
- if (group != NULL) {
- if (!ossl_ec_group_set_params(group, params)) {
- EC_GROUP_free(group);
- group = NULL;
- }
+ int decoded = 0;
+
+ if ((group = group_new_from_name(ptmp, libctx, propq)) == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+ if (!ossl_ec_group_set_params(group, params)) {
+ EC_GROUP_free(group);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ ptmp = OSSL_PARAM_locate_const(params,
+ OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_DECODED_FROM_EXPLICIT_PARAMS);
+ if (ptmp != NULL && !OSSL_PARAM_get_int(ptmp, &decoded)) {
+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_EC, EC_R_WRONG_CURVE_PARAMETERS);
+ EC_GROUP_free(group);
+ return NULL;
}
+ group->decoded_from_explicit_params = decoded > 0;
return group;
}
#ifdef FIPS_MODULE
@@ -1733,6 +1743,8 @@ EC_GROUP *EC_GROUP_new_from_params(const OSSL_PARAM params[],
EC_GROUP_free(group);
group = named_group;
}
+ /* We've imported the group from explicit parameters, set it so. */
+ group->decoded_from_explicit_params = 1;
ok = 1;
err:
if (!ok) {
diff --git a/doc/man7/EVP_PKEY-EC.pod b/doc/man7/EVP_PKEY-EC.pod
index eed83237c3b2..ee66a074f889 100644
--- a/doc/man7/EVP_PKEY-EC.pod
+++ b/doc/man7/EVP_PKEY-EC.pod
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ I<order> multiplied by the I<cofactor> gives the number of points on the curve.
=item "decoded-from-explicit" (B<OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_DECODED_FROM_EXPLICIT_PARAMS>) <integer>
-Gets a flag indicating wether the key or parameters were decoded from explicit
-curve parameters. Set to 1 if so or 0 if a named curve was used.
+Sets or gets a flag indicating whether the key or parameters were decoded from
+explicit curve parameters. Set to 1 if so or 0 if a named curve was used.
=item "use-cofactor-flag" (B<OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_USE_COFACTOR_ECDH>) <integer>
diff --git a/providers/implementations/keymgmt/ec_kmgmt.c b/providers/implementations/keymgmt/ec_kmgmt.c
index 9260d4bf3635..7aed057cac89 100644
--- a/providers/implementations/keymgmt/ec_kmgmt.c
+++ b/providers/implementations/keymgmt/ec_kmgmt.c
@@ -525,7 +525,8 @@ int ec_export(void *keydata, int selection, OSSL_CALLBACK *param_cb,
OSSL_PARAM_octet_string(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_GENERATOR, NULL, 0), \
OSSL_PARAM_BN(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_ORDER, NULL, 0), \
OSSL_PARAM_BN(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_COFACTOR, NULL, 0), \
- OSSL_PARAM_octet_string(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_SEED, NULL, 0)
+ OSSL_PARAM_octet_string(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_SEED, NULL, 0), \
+ OSSL_PARAM_int(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_DECODED_FROM_EXPLICIT_PARAMS, NULL)
# define EC_IMEXPORTABLE_PUBLIC_KEY \
OSSL_PARAM_octet_string(OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_PUB_KEY, NULL, 0)
diff --git a/test/recipes/25-test_verify.t b/test/recipes/25-test_verify.t
index 700bbd849c95..ede14864d5ac 100644
--- a/test/recipes/25-test_verify.t
+++ b/test/recipes/25-test_verify.t
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ use warnings;
use File::Spec::Functions qw/canonpath/;
use File::Copy;
-use OpenSSL::Test qw/:DEFAULT srctop_file ok_nofips with/;
+use OpenSSL::Test qw/:DEFAULT srctop_file bldtop_dir ok_nofips with/;
use OpenSSL::Test::Utils;
setup("test_verify");
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ sub verify {
run(app([@args]));
}
-plan tests => 160;
+plan tests => 163;
# Canonical success
ok(verify("ee-cert", "sslserver", ["root-cert"], ["ca-cert"]),
@@ -309,6 +309,29 @@ SKIP: {
["ca-cert-ec-named"]),
"accept named curve leaf with named curve intermediate");
}
+# Same as above but with base provider used for decoding
+SKIP: {
+ my $no_fips = disabled('fips') || ($ENV{NO_FIPS} // 0);
+ skip "EC is not supported or FIPS is disabled", 3
+ if disabled("ec") || $no_fips;
+
+ my $provconf = srctop_file("test", "fips-and-base.cnf");
+ my $provpath = bldtop_dir("providers");
+ my @prov = ("-provider-path", $provpath);
+ $ENV{OPENSSL_CONF} = $provconf;
+
+ ok(!verify("ee-cert-ec-explicit", "", ["root-cert"],
+ ["ca-cert-ec-named"], @prov),
+ "reject explicit curve leaf with named curve intermediate w/fips");
+ ok(!verify("ee-cert-ec-named-explicit", "", ["root-cert"],
+ ["ca-cert-ec-explicit"], @prov),
+ "reject named curve leaf with explicit curve intermediate w/fips");
+ ok(verify("ee-cert-ec-named-named", "", ["root-cert"],
+ ["ca-cert-ec-named"], @prov),
+ "accept named curve leaf with named curve intermediate w/fips");
+
+ delete $ENV{OPENSSL_CONF};
+}
# Depth tests, note the depth limit bounds the number of CA certificates
# between the trust-anchor and the leaf, so, for example, with a root->ca->leaf

View File

@ -184,8 +184,8 @@ index 700bbd849c..2de1d76b5e 100644
run(app([@args]));
}
-plan tests => 160;
+plan tests => 159;
-plan tests => 163;
+plan tests => 162;
# Canonical success
ok(verify("ee-cert", "sslserver", ["root-cert"], ["ca-cert"]),

View File

@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ Patch12: 0012-Disable-explicit-ec.patch
Patch13: 0013-FIPS-provider-explicit-ec.patch
# https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17998
Patch14: 0014-FIPS-disable-explicit-ec.patch
# https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18609
Patch15: 0015-FIPS-decoded-from-explicit.patch
# Instructions to load legacy provider in openssl.cnf
Patch24: 0024-load-legacy-prov.patch
# Tmp: test name change
@ -470,6 +472,8 @@ install -m644 %{SOURCE9} \
- Related: rhbz#2070197
- Fix PPC64 Montgomery multiplication bug
- Related: rhbz#2098199
- Strict certificates validation shouldn't allow explicit EC parameters
- Related: rhbz#2058663
* Wed Jun 08 2022 Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com> - 1:3.0.1-35
- Add explicit indicators for signatures in FIPS mode and mark signature