numatop/0029-common-use-mount-umount-system-calls-rather-than-usi.patch

77 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Normal View History

From 0df5ed7dd09816495596c7b5224b4747713d3766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:55:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 29/32] common: use mount/umount system calls rather than using
commands
Using the mount and umount commands is slower and less safe than
directly using the mount and umount system calls. Fix this by replacing
the exec'ing of the commands with direct system calls.
Fixes: https://github.com/intel/numatop/issues/60
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@intel.com>
---
common/os/os_util.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/os/os_util.c b/common/os/os_util.c
index 3e4d5fc..a2212fb 100644
--- a/common/os/os_util.c
+++ b/common/os/os_util.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <locale.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <sys/mount.h>
#include "../include/types.h"
#include "../include/util.h"
#include "../include/os/os_util.h"
@@ -731,33 +732,34 @@ static boolean_t resctrl_mounted(void)
boolean_t os_cmt_init(void)
{
- char command[128];
+ int ret;
g_pqos_moni_id = 0;
if (resctrl_mounted())
return B_TRUE;
- snprintf(command, sizeof(command),
- "mount -t resctrl resctrl /sys/fs/resctrl 2>/dev/null");
-
- if (!execute_command(command, "r"))
+ ret = mount("resctrl", "/sys/fs/resctrl", "resctrl", 0, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ debug_print(NULL, 2, "Mount of /sys/fs/resctrl failed (errno = %d)\n", errno);
return B_FALSE;
+ }
return resctrl_mounted();
}
void os_cmt_fini(void)
{
- char command[128];
+ int ret;
if (!resctrl_mounted())
return;
- snprintf(command, sizeof(command),
- "umount -f /sys/fs/resctrl 2>/dev/null");
+ ret = umount("/sys/fs/resctrl");
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ debug_print(NULL, 2, "Unmount of /sys/fs/resctrl failed (errno = %d)\n", errno);
+ }
- execute_command(command, "r");
g_pqos_moni_id = 0;
}
--
2.41.0