From 4b7f32a3ff4007aaeeb374a53eb7c73e1bd98c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:52:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tests/test-sparse-random-blocksize.sh: Reduce maximum block
 size

On i686, this test failed again after randomly choosing:

  + blocksize_r=26
  + blocksize=67108864

Reduce the maximum by another power of two.

Updates: commit 5edcc592dc9d4466596618da2d7507b575492a02
---
 tests/test-sparse-random-blocksize.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/test-sparse-random-blocksize.sh b/tests/test-sparse-random-blocksize.sh
index 29eec3f8..5d268ffb 100755
--- a/tests/test-sparse-random-blocksize.sh
+++ b/tests/test-sparse-random-blocksize.sh
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ rm -f $out
 # but if this picks a 32M block size, then this could consume up to
 # 4 * 16 * 32 == 2048 MB of RAM.  This is a problem on smaller systems
 # (and especially 32 bit), so choose a lesser maximum.
-blocksize_r="$(( 10 + (RANDOM % 17) ))"   ;# 10..26
+blocksize_r="$(( 10 + (RANDOM % 16) ))"   ;# 10..25
 blocksize="$(( 1 << blocksize_r ))"
 
 export out
-- 
2.47.3