- Backport early blocking feature
- remove unused patch
This commit is contained in:
parent
2efa528160
commit
ae552e25f2
286
mod_security_crs-early-blocking.patch
Normal file
286
mod_security_crs-early-blocking.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
|
||||
commit 8acabc1806d3c9be5f781da978a7684639b257d8
|
||||
Author: Tomas Korbar <tkorbar@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Thu Aug 4 12:13:03 2022 +0200
|
||||
|
||||
Add early blocking feature
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/crs-setup.conf.example b/crs-setup.conf.example
|
||||
index 6e18996..08c719e 100644
|
||||
--- a/crs-setup.conf.example
|
||||
+++ b/crs-setup.conf.example
|
||||
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ SecDefaultAction "phase:2,log,auditlog,pass"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
-# -- [[ Anomaly Mode Severity Levels ]] ----------------------------------------
|
||||
+# -- [[ Anomaly Scoring Mode Severity Levels ]] --------------------------------
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Each rule in the CRS has an associated severity level.
|
||||
# These are the default scoring points for each severity level.
|
||||
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ SecDefaultAction "phase:2,log,auditlog,pass"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
-# -- [[ Anomaly Mode Blocking Threshold Levels ]] ------------------------------
|
||||
+# -- [[ Anomaly Scoring Mode Blocking Threshold Levels ]] ----------------------
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Here, you can specify at which cumulative anomaly score an inbound request,
|
||||
# or outbound response, gets blocked.
|
||||
@@ -318,6 +318,35 @@ SecDefaultAction "phase:2,log,auditlog,pass"
|
||||
# setvar:tx.outbound_anomaly_score_threshold=4"
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
+# -- [[ Early Anomaly Scoring Mode Blocking ]] ------------------------------
|
||||
+#
|
||||
+# The anomaly scores for the request and the responses are generally summed up
|
||||
+# and evaluated at the end of phase:2 and at the end of phase:4 respectively.
|
||||
+# However, it is possible to enable an early evaluation of these anomaly scores
|
||||
+# at the end of phase:1 and at the end of phase:3.
|
||||
+#
|
||||
+# If a request (or a response) hits the anomaly threshold in this early
|
||||
+# evaluation, then blocking happens immediately (if blocking is enabled) and
|
||||
+# the phase 2 (and phase 4 respectively) will no longer be executed.
|
||||
+#
|
||||
+# Enable the rule 900120 that sets the variable tx.blocking_early to 1 in order
|
||||
+# to enable early blocking. The variable tx.blocking_early is set to 0 by
|
||||
+# default. Early blocking is thus disabled by default.
|
||||
+#
|
||||
+# Please note that blocking early will hide potential alerts from you. This
|
||||
+# means that a payload that would appear in an alert in phase 2 (or phase 4)
|
||||
+# does not get evaluated if the request is being blocked early. So when you
|
||||
+# disabled blocking early again at some point in the future, then new alerts
|
||||
+# from phase 2 might pop up.
|
||||
+#SecAction \
|
||||
+# "id:900120,\
|
||||
+# phase:1,\
|
||||
+# nolog,\
|
||||
+# pass,\
|
||||
+# t:none,\
|
||||
+# setvar:tx.blocking_early=1"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+
|
||||
# -- [[ Application Specific Rule Exclusions ]] ----------------------------------------
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Some well-known applications may undertake actions that appear to be
|
||||
diff --git a/rules/REQUEST-901-INITIALIZATION.conf b/rules/REQUEST-901-INITIALIZATION.conf
|
||||
index 2a6f74e..b279829 100644
|
||||
--- a/rules/REQUEST-901-INITIALIZATION.conf
|
||||
+++ b/rules/REQUEST-901-INITIALIZATION.conf
|
||||
@@ -88,6 +88,15 @@ SecRule &TX:outbound_anomaly_score_threshold "@eq 0" \
|
||||
ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.0',\
|
||||
setvar:'tx.outbound_anomaly_score_threshold=4'"
|
||||
|
||||
+# Default Blocking Early (rule 900120 in setup.conf)
|
||||
+SecRule &TX:blocking_early "@eq 0" \
|
||||
+ "id:901115,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.0',\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.blocking_early=0'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
# Default Paranoia Level (rule 900000 in setup.conf)
|
||||
SecRule &TX:paranoia_level "@eq 0" \
|
||||
"id:901120,\
|
||||
diff --git a/rules/REQUEST-949-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf b/rules/REQUEST-949-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf
|
||||
index 5f370a1..338ce88 100644
|
||||
--- a/rules/REQUEST-949-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf
|
||||
+++ b/rules/REQUEST-949-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf
|
||||
@@ -11,7 +11,66 @@
|
||||
# -= Paranoia Level 0 (empty) =- (apply unconditionally)
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
-# Summing up the anomaly score.
|
||||
+# Skipping early blocking
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:BLOCKING_EARLY "!@eq 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:949050,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ skipAfter:BLOCKING_EARLY_ANOMALY_SCORING"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:BLOCKING_EARLY "!@eq 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:949051,\
|
||||
+ phase:2,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ skipAfter:BLOCKING_EARLY_ANOMALY_SCORING"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+# Summing up the anomaly score for early blocking
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:949052,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl1}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 2" \
|
||||
+ "id:949053,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl2}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 3" \
|
||||
+ "id:949054,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl3}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 4" \
|
||||
+ "id:949055,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl4}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecAction "id:949059,\
|
||||
+ phase:2,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=0'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecMarker BLOCKING_EARLY_ANOMALY_SCORING
|
||||
|
||||
# NOTE: tx.anomaly_score should not be set initially, but masking would lead to difficult bugs.
|
||||
# So we add to it.
|
||||
@@ -92,6 +151,21 @@ SecRule TX:ANOMALY_SCORE "@ge %{tx.inbound_anomaly_score_threshold}" \
|
||||
severity:'CRITICAL',\
|
||||
setvar:'tx.inbound_anomaly_score=%{tx.anomaly_score}'"
|
||||
|
||||
+SecRule TX:BLOCKING_EARLY "@eq 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:949111,\
|
||||
+ phase:1,\
|
||||
+ deny,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ msg:'Inbound Anomaly Score Exceeded in phase 1 (Total Score: %{TX.ANOMALY_SCORE})',\
|
||||
+ tag:'application-multi',\
|
||||
+ tag:'language-multi',\
|
||||
+ tag:'platform-multi',\
|
||||
+ tag:'attack-generic',\
|
||||
+ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.0',\
|
||||
+ severity:'CRITICAL',\
|
||||
+ chain"
|
||||
+ SecRule TX:ANOMALY_SCORE "@ge %{tx.inbound_anomaly_score_threshold}" \
|
||||
+ "setvar:'tx.inbound_anomaly_score=%{tx.anomaly_score}'"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 1" "id:949011,phase:1,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-949-BLOCKING-EVALUATION"
|
||||
diff --git a/rules/RESPONSE-950-DATA-LEAKAGES.conf b/rules/RESPONSE-950-DATA-LEAKAGES.conf
|
||||
index c34607e..a192359 100644
|
||||
--- a/rules/RESPONSE-950-DATA-LEAKAGES.conf
|
||||
+++ b/rules/RESPONSE-950-DATA-LEAKAGES.conf
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 2" "id:950014,phase:4,pass,nolog,skipAf
|
||||
#
|
||||
SecRule RESPONSE_STATUS "@rx ^5\d{2}$" \
|
||||
"id:950100,\
|
||||
- phase:4,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
block,\
|
||||
capture,\
|
||||
t:none,\
|
||||
diff --git a/rules/RESPONSE-959-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf b/rules/RESPONSE-959-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf
|
||||
index 8f8114c..26b525c 100644
|
||||
--- a/rules/RESPONSE-959-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf
|
||||
+++ b/rules/RESPONSE-959-BLOCKING-EVALUATION.conf
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,67 @@
|
||||
# -= Paranoia Level 0 (empty) =- (apply unconditionally)
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
-# Summing up the anomaly score.
|
||||
+
|
||||
+# Skipping early blocking
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:BLOCKING_EARLY "!@eq 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:959050,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ skipAfter:BLOCKING_EARLY_ANOMALY_SCORING"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:BLOCKING_EARLY "!@eq 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:959051,\
|
||||
+ phase:4,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ skipAfter:BLOCKING_EARLY_ANOMALY_SCORING"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+# Summing up the anomaly score for early blocking
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:959052,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.outbound_anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl1}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 2" \
|
||||
+ "id:959053,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.outbound_anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl2}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 3" \
|
||||
+ "id:959054,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.outbound_anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl3}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecRule TX:PARANOIA_LEVEL "@ge 4" \
|
||||
+ "id:959055,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.outbound_anomaly_score=+%{tx.anomaly_score_pl4}'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecAction "id:959059,\
|
||||
+ phase:4,\
|
||||
+ pass,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ nolog,\
|
||||
+ setvar:'tx.outbound_anomaly_score=0'"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+SecMarker BLOCKING_EARLY_ANOMALY_SCORING
|
||||
|
||||
# NOTE: tx.anomaly_score should not be set initially, but masking would lead to difficult bugs.
|
||||
# So we add to it.
|
||||
@@ -75,6 +135,21 @@ SecRule TX:OUTBOUND_ANOMALY_SCORE "@ge %{tx.outbound_anomaly_score_threshold}" \
|
||||
ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.0',\
|
||||
setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=+%{tx.outbound_anomaly_score}'"
|
||||
|
||||
+SecRule TX:BLOCKING_EARLY "@eq 1" \
|
||||
+ "id:959101,\
|
||||
+ phase:3,\
|
||||
+ deny,\
|
||||
+ t:none,\
|
||||
+ msg:'Outbound Anomaly Score Exceeded in phase 3 (Total Score: %{TX.OUTBOUND_ANOMALY_SCORE})',\
|
||||
+ tag:'application-multi',\
|
||||
+ tag:'language-multi',\
|
||||
+ tag:'platform-multi',\
|
||||
+ tag:'attack-generic',\
|
||||
+ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.0',\
|
||||
+ severity:'CRITICAL',\
|
||||
+ chain"
|
||||
+ SecRule TX:OUTBOUND_ANOMALY_SCORE "@ge %{tx.outbound_anomaly_score_threshold}" \
|
||||
+ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score=%{tx.outbound_anomaly_score}'"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 1" "id:959011,phase:3,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-RESPONSE-959-BLOCKING-EVALUATION"
|
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
Summary: ModSecurity Rules
|
||||
Name: mod_security_crs
|
||||
Version: 3.3.0
|
||||
Release: 4%{?dist}
|
||||
Release: 5%{?dist}
|
||||
License: ASL 2.0
|
||||
URL: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_ModSecurity_Core_Rule_Set_Project
|
||||
Source: https://github.com/coreruleset/coreruleset/archive/refs/tags/v%{version}.tar.gz
|
||||
@ -9,11 +9,14 @@ BuildArch: noarch
|
||||
Requires: mod_security >= 2.8.0
|
||||
Obsoletes: mod_security_crs-extras < 3.0.0
|
||||
|
||||
Patch0: mod_security_crs-early-blocking.patch
|
||||
|
||||
%description
|
||||
This package provides the base rules for mod_security.
|
||||
|
||||
%prep
|
||||
%setup -q -n coreruleset-%{version}
|
||||
%patch0 -p1 -b.early_blocking
|
||||
|
||||
%build
|
||||
|
||||
@ -44,6 +47,9 @@ done
|
||||
%{_datarootdir}/mod_modsecurity_crs
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Wed Aug 31 2022 Luboš Uhliarik <luhliari@redhat.com> - 3.3.0-5
|
||||
- Backport early blocking feature
|
||||
|
||||
* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@fedoraproject.org> - 3.3.0-4
|
||||
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user