mingw-pcre/pcre-8.36-Fix-zero-repeat-assertion-condition-bug.patch

69 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

From 48d2472840efc4dc54dfc698d64aa086332a9033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ph10 <ph10@2f5784b3-3f2a-0410-8824-cb99058d5e15>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:57:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix zero-repeat assertion condition bug.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
git-svn-id: svn://vcs.exim.org/pcre/code/trunk@1513 2f5784b3-3f2a-0410-8824-cb99058d5e15
Signed-off-by: Petr Písař <ppisar@redhat.com>
Petr Pisar: Ported to 8.36.
diff --git a/pcre_exec.c b/pcre_exec.c
index fdf7067..bb5620d 100644
--- a/pcre_exec.c
+++ b/pcre_exec.c
@@ -1404,8 +1404,11 @@ for (;;)
condition = TRUE;
/* Advance ecode past the assertion to the start of the first branch,
- but adjust it so that the general choosing code below works. */
-
+ but adjust it so that the general choosing code below works. If the
+ assertion has a quantifier that allows zero repeats we must skip over
+ the BRAZERO. This is a lunatic thing to do, but somebody did! */
+
+ if (*ecode == OP_BRAZERO) ecode++;
ecode += GET(ecode, 1);
while (*ecode == OP_ALT) ecode += GET(ecode, 1);
ecode += 1 + LINK_SIZE - PRIV(OP_lengths)[condcode];
diff --git a/testdata/testinput2 b/testdata/testinput2
index c6816bf..015422e 100644
--- a/testdata/testinput2
+++ b/testdata/testinput2
@@ -4078,4 +4078,10 @@ backtracking verbs. --/
/\x{whatever}/
+"((?=(?(?=(?(?=(?(?=())))*)))))"
+ a
+
+"(?(?=)?==)(((((((((?=)))))))))"
+ a
+
/-- End of testinput2 --/
diff --git a/testdata/testoutput2 b/testdata/testoutput2
index 1e87026..9a1b14e 100644
--- a/testdata/testoutput2
+++ b/testdata/testoutput2
@@ -14206,4 +14206,14 @@ Failed: digits missing in \x{} or \o{} at offset 3
/\x{whatever}/
Failed: non-hex character in \x{} (closing brace missing?) at offset 3
+"((?=(?(?=(?(?=(?(?=())))*)))))"
+ a
+ 0:
+ 1:
+ 2:
+
+"(?(?=)?==)(((((((((?=)))))))))"
+ a
+No match
+
/-- End of testinput2 --/
--
1.9.3