From a077c14f150f1c4f670dce381ac2eb548f1a4ac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alessandro Astone Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:24:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] zink: Fix resizable BAR detection logic This was broken in two ways: * When looking for the MAX biggest_ram it was actually comparing a candidate against biggest_vis_ram * mem_props.memoryTypes[] should be accessed with the memory type index as found in heap_map Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/10341 Cc: 23.3 Part-of: --- src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_screen.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_screen.c b/src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_screen.c index 5a6d17cb4fa3..6697d7ab938c 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_screen.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_screen.c @@ -3258,10 +3258,10 @@ zink_internal_create_screen(const struct pipe_screen_config *config, int64_t dev { uint64_t biggest_vis_vram = 0; for (unsigned i = 0; i < screen->heap_count[ZINK_HEAP_DEVICE_LOCAL_VISIBLE]; i++) - biggest_vis_vram = MAX2(biggest_vis_vram, screen->info.mem_props.memoryHeaps[screen->info.mem_props.memoryTypes[i].heapIndex].size); + biggest_vis_vram = MAX2(biggest_vis_vram, screen->info.mem_props.memoryHeaps[screen->info.mem_props.memoryTypes[screen->heap_map[ZINK_HEAP_DEVICE_LOCAL_VISIBLE][i]].heapIndex].size); uint64_t biggest_vram = 0; for (unsigned i = 0; i < screen->heap_count[ZINK_HEAP_DEVICE_LOCAL]; i++) - biggest_vram = MAX2(biggest_vis_vram, screen->info.mem_props.memoryHeaps[screen->info.mem_props.memoryTypes[i].heapIndex].size); + biggest_vram = MAX2(biggest_vram, screen->info.mem_props.memoryHeaps[screen->info.mem_props.memoryTypes[screen->heap_map[ZINK_HEAP_DEVICE_LOCAL][i]].heapIndex].size); /* determine if vis vram is roughly equal to total vram */ if (biggest_vis_vram > biggest_vram * 0.9) screen->resizable_bar = true; -- GitLab