From acb8f13be88c224eb1e01f72c1e1fda955bc80ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Blazej Kucman Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:51:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 47/66] imsm: drive encryption policy implementation IMSM cares about drive encryption state. It is not allowed to mix disks with different encryption state within one md device. This policy will verify that attempt to use disks with different encryption states will fail. Verification is performed for devices NVMe/SATA Opal and SATA. There is one exception, Opal SATA drives encryption is not checked when ENCRYPTION_NO_VERIFY key with "sata_opal" value is set in conf, for this reason such drives are treated as without encryption support. Signed-off-by: Blazej Kucman Signed-off-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk --- super-intel.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) diff --git a/super-intel.c b/super-intel.c index fbd1c11f..1faab607 100644 --- a/super-intel.c +++ b/super-intel.c @@ -11291,6 +11291,78 @@ test_and_add_drive_controller_policy_imsm(const char * const type, dev_policy_t return MDADM_STATUS_ERROR; } +/** + * test_and_add_drive_encryption_policy_imsm() - add disk encryption to policies list. + * @type: policy type to search in the list. + * @pols: list of currently recorded policies. + * @disk_fd: file descriptor of the device to check. + * @hba: The hba to which the drive is attached, could be NULL if verification is disabled. + * @verbose: verbose flag. + * + * IMSM cares about drive encryption state. It is not allowed to mix disks with different + * encryption state within one md device. + * If there is no encryption policy on pols we are free to add first one. + * If there is a policy then, new must be the same. + */ +static mdadm_status_t +test_and_add_drive_encryption_policy_imsm(const char * const type, dev_policy_t **pols, int disk_fd, + struct sys_dev *hba, const int verbose) +{ + struct dev_policy *expected_policy = pol_find(*pols, (char *)type); + struct encryption_information information = {0}; + char *encryption_state = "Unknown"; + int status = MDADM_STATUS_SUCCESS; + bool encryption_checked = true; + char devname[PATH_MAX]; + + if (!hba) + goto check_policy; + + switch (hba->type) { + case SYS_DEV_NVME: + case SYS_DEV_VMD: + status = get_nvme_opal_encryption_information(disk_fd, &information, verbose); + break; + case SYS_DEV_SATA: + case SYS_DEV_SATA_VMD: + status = get_ata_encryption_information(disk_fd, &information, verbose); + break; + default: + encryption_checked = false; + } + + if (status) { + fd2devname(disk_fd, devname); + pr_vrb("Failed to read encryption information of device %s\n", devname); + return MDADM_STATUS_ERROR; + } + + if (encryption_checked) { + if (information.status == ENC_STATUS_LOCKED) { + fd2devname(disk_fd, devname); + pr_vrb("Device %s is in Locked state, cannot use. Aborting.\n", devname); + return MDADM_STATUS_ERROR; + } + encryption_state = (char *)get_encryption_status_string(information.status); + } + +check_policy: + if (expected_policy) { + if (strcmp(expected_policy->value, encryption_state) == 0) + return MDADM_STATUS_SUCCESS; + + fd2devname(disk_fd, devname); + pr_vrb("Encryption status \"%s\" detected for disk %s, but \"%s\" status was detected eariler.\n", + encryption_state, devname, expected_policy->value); + pr_vrb("Disks with different encryption status cannot be used.\n"); + return MDADM_STATUS_ERROR; + } + + pol_add(pols, (char *)type, encryption_state, "imsm"); + + return MDADM_STATUS_SUCCESS; +} + struct imsm_drive_policy { char *type; mdadm_status_t (*test_and_add_drive_policy)(const char * const type, @@ -11300,6 +11372,7 @@ struct imsm_drive_policy { struct imsm_drive_policy imsm_policies[] = { {"controller", test_and_add_drive_controller_policy_imsm}, + {"encryption", test_and_add_drive_encryption_policy_imsm} }; mdadm_status_t test_and_add_drive_policies_imsm(struct dev_policy **pols, int disk_fd, -- 2.41.0