add patch

man-pages-2.43-rand.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+--- man-pages-2.43/man3/rand.3.pom	2007-02-15 09:53:56.000000000 +0100
++++ man-pages-2.43/man3/rand.3	2007-02-15 10:08:45.000000000 +0100
+@@ -101,6 +101,16 @@
+ The versions of \fBrand\fP() and \fBsrand\fP() in the Linux C Library use
+ the same random number generator as \fBrandom\fP() and \fBsrandom\fP(), so
+ the lower-order bits should be as random as the higher-order bits.
++.PP
++Most modern
++.BR rand()
++functions, including the one provided on Linux systems,
++do not suffer from this problem, so using expressions like
++.RS
++rand() % 10
++.RE
++works fine.
++.PP
+ However, on older
+ .BR rand ()
+ implementations, and on current implementations on different systems,