rpms/leapp-repository
7
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

import leapp-repository-0.17.0-2.el8

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
CentOS Sources 2022-09-09 10:12:06 +00:00 committed by Stepan Oksanichenko
parent 3bcd4b3b6b
commit 98987cea18
2 changed files with 571 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

562
SOURCES/0001-CheckVDO-Ask-user-only-faiulres-and-undetermined-dev.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,562 @@
From 505963d51e3989a7d907861dd870133c670ccb78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joe Shimkus <joe@shimkus.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 13:30:19 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] CheckVDO: Ask user only faiulres and undetermined devices (+
report update)
The previous solution made possible to skip the VDO check answering
the user question (confirming no vdo devices are present) if the
vdo package is not installed (as the scan of the system could not
be performed). However as part of the bug 2096159 it was discovered
that some systems have very dynamic storage which could dissapear
in the very moment the check by the vdo tool is performed which lead
to the reported inhibitor. We have discovered that this could be real
blocker of the upgrade on such systems as it's pretty simple to hit
at least 1 of N devices to raise such an issue. (*)
To make the upgrade possible on such systems, the dialog has been
updated to be able to skip any problematic VDO checks:
- undetermined block devices
- failures during the vdo scan of a block device
In such a case, user must confirm that no VDO device non-managed
by LVM is present. The dialog is asking now for the `confirm` key
from user instead of `all_vdo_converted`. If any non-LVM managed VDO
devices are discovered, the upgrade is inhibited despite the answer
(this is supposed to happen only when user's answer is not right so
we are ok about that behaviour).
Also reports are updated, as previously it could happen that several
reports with the same title appear during one run of leapp, but each
of them has a different meaning. Set individual titles to all
reports. Also summaries or reports have been updated.
(*) This also includes situations when discovered list of devices
is not complete as some block devices could be loaded after the
initial scan of block devices (StorageInfo msg) is created. Which
means that such devices will not be checked at all as they will not
be known to other actors. We consider this ok as when a system with
dynamic storage is present, usually many of block devices are
redundant. So usually user will have to answer the dialog anyway due
to other "unstable" block devices.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096159
Jira: OAMG-7025
---
.../el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/actor.py | 96 +++++++----
.../actors/checkvdo/libraries/checkvdo.py | 155 ++++++++++--------
.../checkvdo/tests/unit_test_checkvdo.py | 44 +++--
3 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
diff --git a/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/actor.py b/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/actor.py
index c28b3a9..d43bac0 100644
--- a/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/actor.py
+++ b/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/actor.py
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ class CheckVdo(Actor):
`Background`
============
- In RHEL 9.0 the indepdent VDO management software, `vdo manager`, is
+ In RHEL 9.0 the independent VDO management software, `vdo manager`, is
superseded by LVM management. Existing VDOs must be converted to LVM-based
management *before* upgrading to RHEL 9.0.
@@ -32,12 +32,24 @@ class CheckVdo(Actor):
If the VdoConversionInfo model indicates unexpected errors occurred during
scanning CheckVdo will produce appropriate inhibitory reports.
- Lastly, if the VdoConversionInfo model indicates conditions exist where VDO
- devices could exist but the necessary software to check was not installed
- on the system CheckVdo will present a dialog to the user. This dialog will
- ask the user to either install the required software if the user knows or
- is unsure that VDO devices exist or to approve the continuation of the
- upgrade if the user is certain that no VDO devices exist.
+ If the VdoConversionInfo model indicates conditions exist where VDO devices
+ could exist but the necessary software to check was not installed on the
+ system CheckVdo will present a dialog to the user. This dialog will ask the
+ user to either install the required software if the user knows or is unsure
+ that VDO devices exist or to approve the continuation of the upgrade if the
+ user is certain that either there are no VDO devices present or that all
+ VDO devices have been successfully converted.
+
+ To maximize safety CheckVdo operates against all block devices which
+ match the criteria for potential VDO devices. Given the dynamic nature
+ of device presence within a system some devices which may have been present
+ during leapp discovery may not be present when CheckVdo runs. As CheckVdo
+ defaults to producing inhibitory reports if a device cannot be checked
+ (for any reason) this dynamism may be problematic. To prevent CheckVdo
+ producing an inhibitory report for devices which are dynamically no longer
+ present within the system the user may answer the previously mentioned
+ dialog in the affirmative when the user knows that all VDO devices have
+ been converted. This will circumvent checks of block devices.
"""
name = 'check_vdo'
@@ -50,37 +62,55 @@ class CheckVdo(Actor):
reason='Confirmation',
components=(
BooleanComponent(
- key='no_vdo_devices',
- label='Are there no VDO devices on the system?',
- description='Enter True if there are no VDO devices on '
- 'the system and False continue the upgrade. '
- 'If the system has no VDO devices, then it '
- 'is safe to continue the upgrade. If there '
- 'are VDO devices they must all be converted '
- 'to LVM management before the upgrade can '
- 'proceed.',
- reason='Based on installed packages it is possible that '
- 'VDO devices exist on the system. All VDO devices '
- 'must be converted to being managed by LVM before '
- 'the upgrade occurs. Because the \'vdo\' package '
- 'is not installed, Leapp cannot determine whether '
- 'any VDO devices exist that have not yet been '
- 'converted. If the devices are not converted and '
- 'the upgrade proceeds the data on unconverted VDO '
- 'devices will be inaccessible. If you have any '
- 'doubts you should choose to install the \'vdo\' '
- 'package and re-run the upgrade process to check '
- 'for unconverted VDO devices. If you are certain '
- 'that the system has no VDO devices or that all '
- 'VDO devices have been converted to LVM management '
- 'you may opt to allow the upgrade to proceed.'
+ key='confirm',
+ label='Are all VDO devices, if any, successfully converted to LVM management?',
+ description='Enter True if no VDO devices are present '
+ 'on the system or all VDO devices on the system '
+ 'have been successfully converted to LVM '
+ 'management. '
+ 'Entering True will circumvent check of failures '
+ 'and undetermined devices. '
+ 'Recognized VDO devices that have not been '
+ 'converted to LVM management can still block '
+ 'the upgrade despite the answer.'
+ 'All VDO devices must be converted to LVM '
+ 'management before upgrading.',
+ reason='To maximize safety all block devices on a system '
+ 'that meet the criteria as possible VDO devices '
+ 'are checked to verify that, if VDOs, they have '
+ 'been converted to LVM management. '
+ 'If the devices are not converted and the upgrade '
+ 'proceeds the data on unconverted VDO devices will '
+ 'be inaccessible. '
+ 'In order to perform checking the \'vdo\' package '
+ 'must be installed. '
+ 'If the \'vdo\' package is not installed and there '
+ 'are any doubts the \'vdo\' package should be '
+ 'installed and the upgrade process re-run to check '
+ 'for unconverted VDO devices. '
+ 'If the check of any device fails for any reason '
+ 'an upgrade inhibiting report is generated. '
+ 'This may be problematic if devices are '
+ 'dynamically removed from the system subsequent to '
+ 'having been identified during device discovery. '
+ 'If it is certain that all VDO devices have been '
+ 'successfully converted to LVM management this '
+ 'dialog may be answered in the affirmative which '
+ 'will circumvent block device checking.'
),
)
),
)
+ _asked_answer = False
+ _vdo_answer = None
- def get_no_vdo_devices_response(self):
- return self.get_answers(self.dialogs[0]).get('no_vdo_devices')
+ def get_vdo_answer(self):
+ if not self._asked_answer:
+ self._asked_answer = True
+ # calling this multiple times could lead to possible issues
+ # or at least in redundant reports
+ self._vdo_answer = self.get_answers(self.dialogs[0]).get('confirm')
+ return self._vdo_answer
def process(self):
for conversion_info in self.consume(VdoConversionInfo):
diff --git a/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/libraries/checkvdo.py b/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/libraries/checkvdo.py
index 9ba5c70..3b161c9 100644
--- a/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/libraries/checkvdo.py
+++ b/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/libraries/checkvdo.py
@@ -1,10 +1,35 @@
from leapp import reporting
from leapp.libraries.stdlib import api
-_report_title = reporting.Title('VDO devices migration to LVM management')
+def _report_skip_check():
+ if not api.current_actor().get_vdo_answer():
+ return
+
+ summary = ('User has asserted all VDO devices on the system have been '
+ 'successfully converted to LVM management or no VDO '
+ 'devices are present.')
+ reporting.create_report([
+ reporting.Title('Skipping the VDO check of block devices'),
+ reporting.Summary(summary),
+ reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.INFO),
+ reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
+ ])
+
+
+def _process_failed_check_devices(conversion_info):
+ # Post-conversion VDOs that were not successfully checked for having
+ # completed the migration to LVM management.
+ # Return True if failed checks detected
+ devices = [x for x in conversion_info.post_conversion if (not x.complete) and x.check_failed]
+ devices += [x for x in conversion_info.undetermined_conversion if x.check_failed]
+ if not devices:
+ return False
+
+ if api.current_actor().get_vdo_answer():
+ # User asserted all possible VDO should be already converted - skip
+ return True
-def _create_unexpected_resuilt_report(devices):
names = [x.name for x in devices]
multiple = len(names) > 1
summary = ['Unexpected result checking device{0}'.format('s' if multiple else '')]
@@ -16,13 +41,14 @@ def _create_unexpected_resuilt_report(devices):
'and re-run the upgrade.'))
reporting.create_report([
- _report_title,
+ reporting.Title('Checking VDO conversion to LVM management of block devices failed'),
reporting.Summary(summary),
reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.HIGH),
reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
reporting.Remediation(hint=remedy_hint),
reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.INHIBITOR])
])
+ return True
def _process_post_conversion_vdos(vdos):
@@ -32,23 +58,28 @@ def _process_post_conversion_vdos(vdos):
if post_conversion:
devices = [x.name for x in post_conversion]
multiple = len(devices) > 1
- summary = ''.join(('VDO device{0} \'{1}\' '.format('s' if multiple else '',
- ', '.join(devices)),
- 'did not complete migration to LVM management. ',
- 'The named device{0} '.format('s' if multiple else ''),
- '{0} successfully converted at the '.format('were' if multiple else 'was'),
- 'device format level; however, the expected LVM management '
- 'portion of the conversion did not take place. This '
- 'indicates that an exceptional condition (for example, a '
- 'system crash) likely occured during the conversion '
- 'process. The LVM portion of the conversion must be '
- 'performed in order for upgrade to proceed.'))
+ summary = (
+ 'VDO device{s_suffix} \'{devices_str}\' '
+ 'did not complete migration to LVM management. '
+ 'The named device{s_suffix} {was_were} successfully converted '
+ 'at the device format level; however, the expected LVM management '
+ 'portion of the conversion did not take place. This indicates '
+ 'that an exceptional condition (for example, a system crash) '
+ 'likely occurred during the conversion process. The LVM portion '
+ 'of the conversion must be performed in order for upgrade '
+ 'to proceed.'
+ .format(
+ s_suffix='s' if multiple else '',
+ devices_str=', '.join(devices),
+ was_were='were' if multiple else 'was',
+ )
+ )
remedy_hint = ('Consult the VDO to LVM conversion process '
'documentation for how to complete the conversion.')
reporting.create_report([
- _report_title,
+ reporting.Title('Detected VDO devices that have not finished the conversion to LVM management.'),
reporting.Summary(summary),
reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.HIGH),
reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
@@ -56,33 +87,32 @@ def _process_post_conversion_vdos(vdos):
reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.INHIBITOR])
])
- # Post-conversion VDOs that were not successfully checked for having
- # completed the migration to LVM management.
- post_conversion = [x for x in vdos if (not x.complete) and x.check_failed]
- if post_conversion:
- _create_unexpected_resuilt_report(post_conversion)
-
def _process_pre_conversion_vdos(vdos):
# Pre-conversion VDOs generate an inhibiting report.
if vdos:
devices = [x.name for x in vdos]
multiple = len(devices) > 1
- summary = ''.join(('VDO device{0} \'{1}\' require{2} '.format('s' if multiple else '',
- ', '.join(devices),
- '' if multiple else 's'),
- 'migration to LVM management.'
- 'After performing the upgrade VDO devices can only be '
- 'managed via LVM. Any VDO device not currently managed '
- 'by LVM must be converted to LVM management before '
- 'upgrading. The data on any VDO device not converted to '
- 'LVM management will be inaccessible after upgrading.'))
+ summary = (
+ 'VDO device{s_suffix} \'{devices_str}\' require{s_suffix_verb} '
+ 'migration to LVM management.'
+ 'After performing the upgrade VDO devices can only be '
+ 'managed via LVM. Any VDO device not currently managed '
+ 'by LVM must be converted to LVM management before '
+ 'upgrading. The data on any VDO device not converted to '
+ 'LVM management will be inaccessible after upgrading.'
+ .format(
+ s_suffix='s' if multiple else '',
+ s_suffix_verb='' if multiple else 's',
+ devices_str=', '.join(devices),
+ )
+ )
remedy_hint = ('Consult the VDO to LVM conversion process '
'documentation for how to perform the conversion.')
reporting.create_report([
- _report_title,
+ reporting.Title('Detected VDO devices not managed by LVM'),
reporting.Summary(summary),
reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.HIGH),
reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
@@ -104,43 +134,40 @@ def _process_undetermined_conversion_devices(devices):
# A device can only end up as undetermined either via a check that failed
# or if it was not checked. If the info for the device indicates that it
# did not have a check failure that means it was not checked.
-
- checked = [x for x in devices if x.check_failed]
- if checked:
- _create_unexpected_resuilt_report(checked)
+ # Return True if failed checks detected
unchecked = [x for x in devices if not x.check_failed]
- if unchecked:
- no_vdo_devices = api.current_actor().get_no_vdo_devices_response()
- if no_vdo_devices:
- summary = ('User has asserted there are no VDO devices on the '
- 'system in need of conversion to LVM management.')
-
- reporting.create_report([
- _report_title,
- reporting.Summary(summary),
- reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.INFO),
- reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
- reporting.Groups([])
- ])
- elif no_vdo_devices is False:
- summary = ('User has opted to inhibit upgrade in regard to '
- 'potential VDO devices requiring conversion to LVM '
- 'management.')
- remedy_hint = ('Install the \'vdo\' package and re-run upgrade to '
- 'check for VDO devices requiring conversion.')
-
- reporting.create_report([
- _report_title,
- reporting.Summary(summary),
- reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.HIGH),
- reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
- reporting.Remediation(hint=remedy_hint),
- reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.INHIBITOR])
- ])
+ if not unchecked:
+ return False
+
+ if api.current_actor().get_vdo_answer():
+ # User asserted no VDO devices are present
+ return True
+
+ summary = (
+ 'The check of block devices could not be performed as the \'vdo\' '
+ 'package is not installed. All VDO devices must be converted to '
+ 'LVM management prior to the upgrade to prevent the loss of data.')
+ remedy_hint = ('Install the \'vdo\' package and re-run upgrade to '
+ 'check for VDO devices requiring conversion or confirm '
+ 'that all VDO devices, if any, are managed by LVM.')
+
+ reporting.create_report([
+ reporting.Title('Cannot perform the VDO check of block devices'),
+ reporting.Summary(summary),
+ reporting.Severity(reporting.Severity.HIGH),
+ reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.SERVICES, reporting.Groups.DRIVERS]),
+ reporting.Remediation(hint=remedy_hint),
+ reporting.Groups([reporting.Groups.INHIBITOR])
+ ])
+ return True
def check_vdo(conversion_info):
_process_pre_conversion_vdos(conversion_info.pre_conversion)
_process_post_conversion_vdos(conversion_info.post_conversion)
- _process_undetermined_conversion_devices(conversion_info.undetermined_conversion)
+
+ detected_under_dev = _process_undetermined_conversion_devices(conversion_info.undetermined_conversion)
+ detected_failed_check = _process_failed_check_devices(conversion_info)
+ if detected_under_dev or detected_failed_check:
+ _report_skip_check()
diff --git a/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/tests/unit_test_checkvdo.py b/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/tests/unit_test_checkvdo.py
index e0ac39d..865e036 100644
--- a/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/tests/unit_test_checkvdo.py
+++ b/repos/system_upgrade/el8toel9/actors/checkvdo/tests/unit_test_checkvdo.py
@@ -13,14 +13,16 @@ from leapp.models import (
from leapp.utils.report import is_inhibitor
-class MockedActorNoVdoDevices(CurrentActorMocked):
- def get_no_vdo_devices_response(self):
- return True
+# Mock actor base for CheckVdo tests.
+class MockedActorCheckVdo(CurrentActorMocked):
+ def get_vdo_answer(self):
+ return False
-class MockedActorSomeVdoDevices(CurrentActorMocked):
- def get_no_vdo_devices_response(self):
- return False
+# Mock actor for all_vdo_converted dialog response.
+class MockedActorAllVdoConvertedTrue(MockedActorCheckVdo):
+ def get_vdo_answer(self):
+ return True
def aslist(f):
@@ -66,6 +68,7 @@ def _undetermined_conversion_vdos(count=0, failing=False, start_char='a'):
# No VDOs tests.
def test_no_vdos(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
@@ -76,6 +79,7 @@ def test_no_vdos(monkeypatch):
# Concurrent pre- and post-conversion tests.
def test_both_conversion_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
post_count = 7
checkvdo.check_vdo(
@@ -89,6 +93,7 @@ def test_both_conversion_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
# Post-conversion tests.
def test_post_conversion_multiple_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(7, 5),
@@ -100,6 +105,7 @@ def test_post_conversion_multiple_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
def test_post_conversion_multiple_vdo_complete(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(7, 7),
@@ -109,6 +115,7 @@ def test_post_conversion_multiple_vdo_complete(monkeypatch):
def test_post_conversion_single_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(1),
@@ -121,6 +128,7 @@ def test_post_conversion_single_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
def test_post_conversion_single_check_failing(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(2, complete=1, failing=1),
@@ -135,6 +143,7 @@ def test_post_conversion_single_check_failing(monkeypatch):
def test_post_conversion_multiple_check_failing(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(7, complete=4, failing=3),
@@ -147,6 +156,7 @@ def test_post_conversion_multiple_check_failing(monkeypatch):
def test_post_conversion_incomplete_and_check_failing(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(2, failing=1),
@@ -158,6 +168,7 @@ def test_post_conversion_incomplete_and_check_failing(monkeypatch):
# Pre-conversion tests.
def test_pre_conversion_multiple_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
@@ -169,6 +180,7 @@ def test_pre_conversion_multiple_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
def test_pre_conversion_single_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
@@ -182,6 +194,7 @@ def test_pre_conversion_single_vdo_incomplete(monkeypatch):
# Undetermined tests.
def test_undetermined_single_check_failing(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
@@ -196,6 +209,7 @@ def test_undetermined_single_check_failing(monkeypatch):
def test_undetermined_multiple_check_failing(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
@@ -207,27 +221,29 @@ def test_undetermined_multiple_check_failing(monkeypatch):
'Unexpected result checking devices')
-def test_undetermined_multiple_no_check_no_vdos(monkeypatch):
- monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorNoVdoDevices())
+def test_undetermined_multiple_no_check(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorCheckVdo())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
pre_conversion=_pre_conversion_vdos(),
undetermined_conversion=_undetermined_conversion_vdos(3)))
assert reporting.create_report.called == 1
- assert not is_inhibitor(reporting.create_report.report_fields)
+ assert is_inhibitor(reporting.create_report.report_fields)
assert reporting.create_report.report_fields['summary'].startswith(
- 'User has asserted there are no VDO devices')
+ 'The check of block devices could not be performed as the \'vdo\' '
+ 'package is not installed.')
-def test_undetermined_multiple_no_check_some_vdos(monkeypatch):
- monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorSomeVdoDevices())
+# all_vdo_converted test.
+def test_all_vdo_converted_true(monkeypatch):
+ monkeypatch.setattr(api, 'current_actor', MockedActorAllVdoConvertedTrue())
monkeypatch.setattr(reporting, 'create_report', create_report_mocked())
checkvdo.check_vdo(
VdoConversionInfo(post_conversion=_post_conversion_vdos(),
pre_conversion=_pre_conversion_vdos(),
undetermined_conversion=_undetermined_conversion_vdos(3)))
assert reporting.create_report.called == 1
- assert is_inhibitor(reporting.create_report.report_fields)
+ assert not is_inhibitor(reporting.create_report.report_fields)
assert reporting.create_report.report_fields['summary'].startswith(
- 'User has opted to inhibit upgrade')
+ 'User has asserted all VDO devices on the system have been successfully converted')
--
2.37.2

10
SPECS/leapp-repository.spec
View File

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ py2_byte_compile "%1" "%2"}
Name: leapp-repository
Version: 0.17.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Repositories for leapp
License: ASL 2.0
@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ BuildArch: noarch
### PATCHES HERE
# Patch0001: filename.patch
Patch0001: 0001-CheckVDO-Ask-user-only-faiulres-and-undetermined-dev.patch
%description
@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ Requires: dracut
# APPLY PATCHES HERE
# %%patch0001 -p1
%patch0001 -p1
%build
@ -262,6 +264,12 @@ done;
# no files here
%changelog
* Wed Sep 07 2022 Petr Stodulka <pstodulk@redhat.com> - 0.17.0-2
- Update VDO checks to enable user to decide the system state on check failures
and undetermined block devices
- The VDO dialog and related VDO reports have been properly updated
- Resolves: rhbz#2096159
* Wed Aug 24 2022 Petr Stodulka <pstodulk@redhat.com> - 0.17.0-1
- Rebase to v0.17.0
- Support upgrade path RHEL 8.7 -> 9.0 and RHEL SAP 8.6 -> 9.0