From 3bfe632c7011c335362d78356232507d9ee26f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robbie Harwood Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:31:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Exit with status 0 from kadmind Typically, 0 denotes successful exit. In particular, init systems will complain if another different value is returned. This presents a problem for automated installation jobs which want to restart kadmind. `service kadmin stop` typically sends SIGTERM, which is caught by verto and passed to our handler. Besides cleanup, we then call verto_break(), which causes the verto_run() event loop to return. The weird return code has been present since the addition of the kadmin code, which used a similar event model for signals. (cherry picked from commit f970ad412aca36f8a7d3addb1cd4026ed22e5592) --- src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c b/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c index aac4d4ffd..0a28b2384 100644 --- a/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c +++ b/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c @@ -559,5 +559,5 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) krb5_klog_close(context); krb5_free_context(context); - exit(2); + exit(0); }