rpms/java-25-openjdk-portable
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

import CS java-25-openjdk-portable-22.0.2.0.9-2.el9

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Lukoshko 2026-02-21 13:13:55 +00:00
parent ce3f3cac85
commit e1d1a5f3fe
1 changed files with 27 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
java-25-openjdk.spec
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# debug_package %%{nil} is portable-jdks specific
%define debug_package %{nil}
%define debug_package %{nil}
# RPM conditionals so as to be able to dynamically produce
# slowdebug/release builds. See:
@ -335,7 +335,7 @@
# buildjdkver is usually same as %%{featurever},
# but in time of bootstrap of next jdk, it is featurever-1,
# and this it is better to change it here, on single place
%global buildjdkver %(expr %{featurever} - 1)
%global buildjdkver %{featurever}
# We don't add any LTS designator for STS packages (Fedora and EPEL).
# We need to explicitly exclude EPEL as it would have the %%{rhel} macro defined.
%if 0%{?rhel} && !0%{?epel}
@ -346,8 +346,12 @@
%global lts_designator_zip ""
%endif
# JDK to use for bootstrapping
%global bootjdkpkg java-21-openjdk
%global bootjdk /usr/lib/jvm/%{bootjdkpkg}
%global bootjdkpkg java-%{fakefeaturever}-openjdk
%ifarch %{fastdebug_arches}
%global bootdebugpkg fastdebug
%endif
%global bootjdkzip %{_jvmdir}/%{bootjdkpkg}-*.portable%{?bootdebugpkg:.%{bootdebugpkg}}.jdk.%{_arch}.tar.xz
%global bootjdk %{_builddir}/%{bootjdkpkg}.boot
# Define whether to use the bootstrap JDK directly or with a fresh libjvm.so
# This will only work where the bootstrap JDK is the same major version
# as the JDK being built
@ -397,7 +401,7 @@
%global top_level_dir_name %{vcstag}
%global top_level_dir_name_backup %{top_level_dir_name}-backup
%global buildver 9
%global rpmrelease 1
%global rpmrelease 2
#%%global tagsuffix %%{nil}
# Priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
%if %is_system_jdk
@ -734,7 +738,7 @@ BuildRequires: zip
BuildRequires: tar
BuildRequires: unzip
BuildRequires: javapackages-filesystem
BuildRequires: %{bootjdkpkg}%{?pkgos:-%{pkgos}}-devel
BuildRequires: %{bootjdkpkg}-portable-devel%{?bootdebugpkg:-%{bootdebugpkg}}
# Zero-assembler build requirement
%ifarch %{zero_arches}
BuildRequires: libffi-devel
@ -1057,6 +1061,16 @@ done
%endif
%endif
# Extract build JDK
pushd %{_jvmdir}
sha256sum --check %{bootjdkzip}.sha256sum
popd
tar -xJf %{bootjdkzip}
mv java-%{fakefeaturever}-openjdk-%{featurever}* %{bootjdk}
# Print release information
echo "Installed boot JDK:"
cat %{bootjdk}/release
%build
# How many CPU's do we have?
export NUM_PROC=%(/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN 2> /dev/null || :)
@ -1629,7 +1643,7 @@ done # end of release / debug cycle loop
# We test debug first as it will give better diagnostics on a crash
for suffix in %{build_loop} ; do
# portable builds have static_libs embedded, thus top_dir_abs_main_build_path is same as top_dir_abs_staticlibs_build_path
# portable builds have static_libs embedded, thus top_dir_abs_main_build_path is same as top_dir_abs_staticlibs_build_path
top_dir_abs_main_build_path=$(pwd)/%{installoutputdir -- ${suffix}}
%if %{include_staticlibs}
top_dir_abs_staticlibs_build_path=${top_dir_abs_main_build_path}
@ -1943,6 +1957,12 @@ done
%endif
%changelog
* Mon Sep 22 2025 Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com> - 1:22.0.2.0.9-2
- Build using ourselves rather than the system JDK as java-25-openjdk is unavailable on older systems
- Switch buildjdkver back to featurever temporarily for this rebuild
- Introduce bootjdkpkg to handle architectures not in fastdebug_arches (i.e. s390x)
- Related: RHELBU-3203
* Sat Sep 20 2025 Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com> - 1:22.0.2.0.9-1
- Update to jdk-22.0.2+9 (GA)
- Update release notes with features of JDK 22