Reinstate JIT builds on x86_32.
Add JDK-8282004 to fix missing CALL effects on x86_32.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bb7626ce6
commit
ed4b79a683
@ -113,11 +113,11 @@
|
|||||||
# Set of architectures for which we build fastdebug builds
|
# Set of architectures for which we build fastdebug builds
|
||||||
%global fastdebug_arches x86_64 ppc64le aarch64
|
%global fastdebug_arches x86_64 ppc64le aarch64
|
||||||
# Set of architectures with a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler
|
# Set of architectures with a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler
|
||||||
%global jit_arches %{arm} %{aarch64} %{power64} s390x sparcv9 sparc64 x86_64
|
%global jit_arches %{arm} %{aarch64} %{ix86} %{power64} s390x sparcv9 sparc64 x86_64
|
||||||
# Set of architectures which use the Zero assembler port (!jit_arches)
|
# Set of architectures which use the Zero assembler port (!jit_arches)
|
||||||
%global zero_arches ppc s390 %{ix86}
|
%global zero_arches ppc s390
|
||||||
# Set of architectures which run a full bootstrap cycle
|
# Set of architectures which run a full bootstrap cycle
|
||||||
%global bootstrap_arches %{jit_arches} %{ix86}
|
%global bootstrap_arches %{jit_arches}
|
||||||
# Set of architectures which support SystemTap tapsets
|
# Set of architectures which support SystemTap tapsets
|
||||||
%global systemtap_arches %{jit_arches}
|
%global systemtap_arches %{jit_arches}
|
||||||
# Set of architectures with a Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) compiler
|
# Set of architectures with a Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) compiler
|
||||||
@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
|
|||||||
%global top_level_dir_name %{origin}
|
%global top_level_dir_name %{origin}
|
||||||
%global top_level_dir_name_backup %{top_level_dir_name}-backup
|
%global top_level_dir_name_backup %{top_level_dir_name}-backup
|
||||||
%global buildver 8
|
%global buildver 8
|
||||||
%global rpmrelease 4
|
%global rpmrelease 5
|
||||||
# Priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
|
# Priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
|
||||||
%if %is_system_jdk
|
%if %is_system_jdk
|
||||||
# Using 10 digits may overflow the int used for priority, so we combine the patch and build versions
|
# Using 10 digits may overflow the int used for priority, so we combine the patch and build versions
|
||||||
@ -1336,6 +1336,8 @@ Patch1016: rh2021263-fips_separate_policy_and_fips_init.patch
|
|||||||
# OpenJDK patches in need of upstreaming
|
# OpenJDK patches in need of upstreaming
|
||||||
#
|
#
|
||||||
#############################################
|
#############################################
|
||||||
|
# JDK-8282004: x86_32.ad rules that call SharedRuntime helpers should have CALL effects
|
||||||
|
Patch7: jdk8282004-x86_32-missing_call_effects.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BuildRequires: autoconf
|
BuildRequires: autoconf
|
||||||
BuildRequires: automake
|
BuildRequires: automake
|
||||||
@ -1740,6 +1742,7 @@ pushd %{top_level_dir_name}
|
|||||||
%patch4 -p1
|
%patch4 -p1
|
||||||
%patch5 -p1
|
%patch5 -p1
|
||||||
%patch6 -p1
|
%patch6 -p1
|
||||||
|
%patch7 -p1
|
||||||
popd # openjdk
|
popd # openjdk
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%patch1000
|
%patch1000
|
||||||
@ -2528,6 +2531,10 @@ cjc.mainProgram(args)
|
|||||||
%endif
|
%endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%changelog
|
%changelog
|
||||||
|
* Wed Feb 16 2022 Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com> - 1:17.0.2.0.8-5
|
||||||
|
- Reinstate JIT builds on x86_32.
|
||||||
|
- Add JDK-8282004 to fix missing CALL effects on x86_32.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Mon Feb 07 2022 Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@redhat.com> - 1:17.0.2.0.8-4
|
* Mon Feb 07 2022 Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@redhat.com> - 1:17.0.2.0.8-4
|
||||||
- Re-enable gdb backtrace check.
|
- Re-enable gdb backtrace check.
|
||||||
- Resolves RHBZ#2041970
|
- Resolves RHBZ#2041970
|
||||||
|
28
jdk8282004-x86_32-missing_call_effects.patch
Normal file
28
jdk8282004-x86_32-missing_call_effects.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|||||||
|
diff --git a/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad b/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad
|
||||||
|
index a31a38a384f..6138ca5281f 100644
|
||||||
|
--- a/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad
|
||||||
|
+++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad
|
||||||
|
@@ -7825,9 +7825,9 @@ instruct divI_eReg(eAXRegI rax, eDXRegI rdx, eCXRegI div, eFlagsReg cr) %{
|
||||||
|
%}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Divide Register Long
|
||||||
|
-instruct divL_eReg( eADXRegL dst, eRegL src1, eRegL src2, eFlagsReg cr, eCXRegI cx, eBXRegI bx ) %{
|
||||||
|
+instruct divL_eReg(eADXRegL dst, eRegL src1, eRegL src2) %{
|
||||||
|
match(Set dst (DivL src1 src2));
|
||||||
|
- effect( KILL cr, KILL cx, KILL bx );
|
||||||
|
+ effect(CALL);
|
||||||
|
ins_cost(10000);
|
||||||
|
format %{ "PUSH $src1.hi\n\t"
|
||||||
|
"PUSH $src1.lo\n\t"
|
||||||
|
@@ -7873,9 +7873,9 @@ instruct modI_eReg(eDXRegI rdx, eAXRegI rax, eCXRegI div, eFlagsReg cr) %{
|
||||||
|
%}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Remainder Register Long
|
||||||
|
-instruct modL_eReg( eADXRegL dst, eRegL src1, eRegL src2, eFlagsReg cr, eCXRegI cx, eBXRegI bx ) %{
|
||||||
|
+instruct modL_eReg(eADXRegL dst, eRegL src1, eRegL src2) %{
|
||||||
|
match(Set dst (ModL src1 src2));
|
||||||
|
- effect( KILL cr, KILL cx, KILL bx );
|
||||||
|
+ effect(CALL);
|
||||||
|
ins_cost(10000);
|
||||||
|
format %{ "PUSH $src1.hi\n\t"
|
||||||
|
"PUSH $src1.lo\n\t"
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user