Fix zero interpreter

java-1.8.0-openjdk.spec

@@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ Patch102: %{name}-size_t.patch
 Patch201: system-libjpeg.patch
 Patch202: system-libpng.patch
 Patch203: system-lcms.patch
+Patch204: zero-interpreter-fix.patch
 
 Patch300: jstack-pr1845.patch
 
@@ -986,6 +987,9 @@ sh %{SOURCE12}
 %patch201
 %patch202
 %patch203
+%ifnarch %{aarch64}
+%patch204
+%endif
 
 %patch1
 %patch3
@@ -1689,6 +1693,9 @@ end
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2015 Omair Majid <omajid@redhat.com> - 1:1.8.0.40-21.b25
+- Fix zero interpreter build.
+
 * Thu Feb 12 2015 Omair Majid <omajid@redhat.com> - 1:1.8.0.40-21.b25
 - Fix building with gcc 5 by ignoring return-local-addr warning
 - Include additional debugging info for java class files and test that they are

zero-interpreter-fix.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# HG changeset patch
+# User roland
+# Date 1418632606 -3600
+# Node ID a733dad6fc1e2572ed227e898da35e0053cbb7c5
+# Parent  db035d4ba1bd25ac8803bb2d177cb35681eb6907
+8067231: Zero builds fails after JDK-6898462
+Summary: Interpreter::remove_activation_entry() is not defined for the C++ interpreter
+Reviewed-by: roland, coleenp
+Contributed-by: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@redhat.com>
+
+--- jdk8/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/interpreterRuntime.cpp	Sat Dec 13 01:24:10 2014 +0300
++++ jdk8/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/interpreterRuntime.cpp	Mon Dec 15 09:36:46 2014 +0100
+@@ -394,7 +394,11 @@
+     // during deoptimization so the interpreter needs to skip it when
+     // the frame is popped.
+     thread->set_do_not_unlock_if_synchronized(true);
++#ifdef CC_INTERP
++    return (address) -1;
++#else
+     return Interpreter::remove_activation_entry();
++#endif
+   }
+ 
+   // Need to do this check first since when _do_not_unlock_if_synchronized
+