glibc/SOURCES/glibc-RHEL-15696-66.patch

52 lines
1.5 KiB
Diff

From d672a98a1af106bd68deb15576710cd61363f7a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:33:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add LLL_MUTEX_READ_LOCK [BZ #28537]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
CAS instruction is expensive. From the x86 CPU's point of view, getting
a cache line for writing is more expensive than reading. See Appendix
A.2 Spinlock in:
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/xeon-lock-scaling-analysis-paper.pdf
The full compare and swap will grab the cache line exclusive and cause
excessive cache line bouncing.
Add LLL_MUTEX_READ_LOCK to do an atomic load and skip CAS in spinlock
loop if compare may fail to reduce cache line bouncing on contended locks.
Reviewed-by: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
---
nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c b/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c
index 60ada70d..eb4d8baa 100644
--- a/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c
+++ b/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@
#define FORCE_ELISION(m, s)
#endif
+#ifndef LLL_MUTEX_READ_LOCK
+# define LLL_MUTEX_READ_LOCK(mutex) \
+ atomic_load_relaxed (&(mutex)->__data.__lock)
+#endif
+
static int __pthread_mutex_lock_full (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
__attribute_noinline__;
@@ -136,6 +141,8 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
break;
}
atomic_spin_nop ();
+ if (LLL_MUTEX_READ_LOCK (mutex) != 0)
+ continue;
}
while (LLL_MUTEX_TRYLOCK (mutex) != 0);
--
GitLab