glibc/glibc-RHEL-22165-4.patch
Patsy Griffin 2ea0ac63f1 Enhance ld.so --list-diagnostics on aarch64
Resolves: RHEL-22165
2024-06-06 14:24:58 -04:00

511 lines
22 KiB
Diff

commit 7a430f40c46acfa7ce4c3bff193b278c190b2efc
Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Apr 8 16:48:55 2024 +0200
x86: Add generic CPUID data dumper to ld.so --list-diagnostics
This is surprisingly difficult to implement if the goal is to produce
reasonably sized output. With the current approaches to output
compression (suppressing zeros and repeated results between CPUs,
folding ranges of identical subleaves, dealing with the %ecx
reflection issue), the output is less than 600 KiB even for systems
with 256 logical CPUs.
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
diff -Nrup a/manual/dynlink.texi b/manual/dynlink.texi
--- a/manual/dynlink.texi 2024-06-03 08:42:17.011026573 -0400
+++ b/manual/dynlink.texi 2024-06-03 08:55:18.607771972 -0400
@@ -262,7 +262,90 @@ The value of the @code{dczid_el0} system
@item x86.cpu_features.@dots{}
These items are specific to the i386 and x86-64 architectures. They
reflect supported CPU features and information on cache geometry, mostly
-collected using the @code{CPUID} instruction.
+collected using the CPUID instruction.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].@dots{}
+These are additional items for the i386 and x86-64 architectures, as
+described below. They mostly contain raw data from the CPUID
+instruction. The probes are performed for each active CPU for the
+@code{ld.so} process, and data for different probed CPUs receives a
+uniqe @var{index} value. Some CPUID data is expected to differ from CPU
+core to CPU core. In some cases, CPUs are not correctly initialized and
+indicate the presence of different feature sets.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].requested=@var{kernel-cpu}
+The kernel is told to run the subsequent probing on the CPU numbered
+@var{kernel-cpu}. The values @var{kernel-cpu} and @var{index} can be
+distinct if there are gaps in the process CPU affinity mask. This line
+is not included if CPU affinity mask information is not available.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].observed=@var{kernel-cpu}
+This line reports the kernel CPU number @var{kernel-cpu} on which the
+probing code initially ran. If the CPU number cannot be obtained,
+this line is not printed.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].observed_node=@var{node}
+This reports the observed NUMA node number, as reported by the
+@code{getcpu} system call. If this information cannot be obtained, this
+line is not printed.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid_leaves=@var{count}
+This line indicates that @var{count} distinct CPUID leaves were
+encountered. (This reflects internal @code{ld.so} storage space, it
+does not directly correspond to @code{CPUID} enumeration ranges.)
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].ecx_limit=@var{value}
+The CPUID data extraction code uses a brute-force approach to enumerate
+subleaves (see the @samp{.subleaf_eax} lines below). The last
+@code{%rcx} value used in a CPUID query on this probed CPU was
+@var{value}.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.eax[@var{query_eax}].eax=@var{eax}
+@itemx x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.eax[@var{query_eax}].ebx=@var{ebx}
+@itemx x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx=@var{ecx}
+@itemx x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.eax[@var{query_eax}].edx=@var{edx}
+These lines report the register contents after executing the CPUID
+instruction with @samp{%rax == @var{query_eax}} and @samp{%rcx == 0} (a
+@dfn{leaf}). For the first probed CPU (with a zero @var{index}), only
+leaves with non-zero register contents are reported. For subsequent
+CPUs, only leaves whose register contents differs from the previously
+probed CPUs (with @var{index} one less) are reported.
+
+Basic and extended leaves are reported using the same syntax. This
+means there is a large jump in @var{query_eax} for the first reported
+extended leaf.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].eax=@var{eax}
+@itemx x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].ebx=@var{ebx}
+@itemx x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].ecx=@var{ecx}
+@itemx x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].edx=@var{edx}
+This is similar to the leaves above, but for a @dfn{subleaf}. For
+subleaves, the CPUID instruction is executed with @samp{%rax ==
+@var{query_eax}} and @samp{%rcx == @var{query_ecx}}, so the result
+depends on both register values. The same rules about filtering zero
+and identical results apply.
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].until_ecx=@var{ecx_limit}
+Some CPUID results are the same regardless the @var{query_ecx} value.
+If this situation is detected, a line with the @samp{.until_ecx}
+selector ins included, and this indicates that the CPUID register
+contents is the same for @code{%rcx} values between @var{query_ecx}
+and @var{ecx_limit} (inclusive).
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].cpuid.subleaf_eax[@var{query_eax}].ecx[@var{query_ecx}].ecx_query_mask=0xff
+This line indicates that in an @samp{.until_ecx} range, the CPUID
+instruction preserved the lowested 8 bits of the input @code{%rcx} in
+the output @code{%rcx} registers. Otherwise, the subleaves in the range
+have identical values. This special treatment is necessary to report
+compact range information in case such copying occurs (because the
+subleaves would otherwise be all different).
+
+@item x86.processor[@var{index}].xgetbv.ecx[@var{query_ecx}]=@var{result}
+This line shows the 64-bit @var{result} value in the @code{%rdx:%rax}
+register pair after executing the XGETBV instruction with @code{%rcx}
+set to @var{query_ecx}. Zero values and values matching the previously
+probed CPU are omitted. Nothing is printed if the system does not
+support the XGETBV instruction.
@end table
@node Dynamic Linker Introspection
diff -Nrup a/sysdeps/x86/dl-diagnostics-cpu.c b/sysdeps/x86/dl-diagnostics-cpu.c
--- a/sysdeps/x86/dl-diagnostics-cpu.c 2024-06-03 08:42:16.825025689 -0400
+++ b/sysdeps/x86/dl-diagnostics-cpu.c 2024-06-03 09:49:47.528510916 -0400
@@ -17,7 +17,18 @@
<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
#include <dl-diagnostics.h>
+
+#include <array_length.h>
+#include <cpu-features.h>
+#include <cpuid.h>
+#include <dl-iterate_cpu.h>
#include <ldsodefs.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sysdep.h>
+
+/* The generic CPUID dumping code. */
+static void _dl_diagnostics_cpuid (void);
static void
print_cpu_features_value (const char *label, uint64_t value)
@@ -119,4 +130,377 @@ _dl_diagnostics_cpu (void)
"last cpu_features field has been printed");
print_cpu_features_value ("cachesize_non_temporal_divisor",
__rtld_global_ro_cachesize_non_temporal_divisor);
+
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid ();
+}
+
+/* The following code implements a generic CPUID dumper that tries to
+ gather CPUID data without knowing about CPUID implementation
+ details. */
+
+/* Register arguments to CPUID. Multiple ECX subleaf values yielding
+ the same result are combined, to shorten the output. Both
+ identical matches (EAX to EDX are the same) and matches where EAX,
+ EBX, EDX, and ECX are equal except in the lower byte, which must
+ match the query ECX value. The latter is needed to compress ranges
+ on CPUs which preserve the lowest byte in ECX if an unknown leaf is
+ queried. */
+struct cpuid_query
+{
+ unsigned int eax;
+ unsigned ecx_first;
+ unsigned ecx_last;
+ bool ecx_preserves_query_byte;
+};
+
+/* Single integer value that can be used for sorting/ordering
+ comparisons. Uses Q->eax and Q->ecx_first only because ecx_last is
+ always greater than the previous ecx_first value and less than the
+ subsequent one. */
+static inline unsigned long long int
+cpuid_query_combined (struct cpuid_query *q)
+{
+ /* ecx can be -1 (that is, ~0U). If this happens, this the only ecx
+ value for this eax value, so the ordering does not matter. */
+ return ((unsigned long long int) q->eax << 32) | (unsigned int) q->ecx_first;
+};
+
+/* Used for differential reporting of zero/non-zero values. */
+static const struct cpuid_registers cpuid_registers_zero;
+
+/* Register arguments to CPUID paired with the results that came back. */
+struct cpuid_query_result
+{
+ struct cpuid_query q;
+ struct cpuid_registers r;
+};
+
+/* During a first enumeration pass, we try to collect data for
+ cpuid_initial_subleaf_limit subleaves per leaf/EAX value. If we run
+ out of space, we try once more with applying the lower limit. */
+enum { cpuid_main_leaf_limit = 128 };
+enum { cpuid_initial_subleaf_limit = 512 };
+enum { cpuid_subleaf_limit = 32 };
+
+/* Offset of the extended leaf area. */
+enum {cpuid_extended_leaf_offset = 0x80000000 };
+
+/* Collected CPUID data. Everything is stored in a statically sized
+ array that is sized so that the second pass will collect some data
+ for all leaves, after the limit is applied. On the second pass,
+ ecx_limit is set to cpuid_subleaf_limit. */
+struct cpuid_collected_data
+{
+ unsigned int used;
+ unsigned int ecx_limit;
+ uint64_t xgetbv_ecx_0;
+ struct cpuid_query_result qr[cpuid_main_leaf_limit
+ * 2 * cpuid_subleaf_limit];
+};
+
+/* Fill in the result of a CPUID query. Returns true if there is
+ room, false if nothing could be stored. */
+static bool
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_store (struct cpuid_collected_data *ccd,
+ unsigned eax, int ecx)
+{
+ if (ccd->used >= array_length (ccd->qr))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Tentatively fill in the next value. */
+ __cpuid_count (eax, ecx,
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.eax,
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ebx,
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ecx,
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.edx);
+
+ /* If the ECX subleaf is next subleaf after the previous one (for
+ the same leaf), and the values are the same, merge the result
+ with the already-stored one. Do this before skipping zero
+ leaves, which avoids artifiacts for ECX == 256 queries. */
+ if (ccd->used > 0
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.eax == eax
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_last + 1 == ecx)
+ {
+ /* Exact match of the previous result. Ignore the value of
+ ecx_preserves_query_byte if this is a singleton range so far
+ because we can treat ECX as fixed if the same value repeats. */
+ if ((!ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_preserves_query_byte
+ || (ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_first
+ == ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_last))
+ && memcmp (&ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].r, &ccd->qr[ccd->used].r,
+ sizeof (ccd->qr[ccd->used].r)) == 0)
+ {
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_last = ecx;
+ /* ECX is now fixed because the same value has been observed
+ twice, even if we had a low-byte match before. */
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_preserves_query_byte = false;
+ return true;
+ }
+ /* Match except for the low byte in ECX, which must match the
+ incoming ECX value. */
+ if (ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_preserves_query_byte
+ && (ecx & 0xff) == (ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ecx & 0xff)
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.eax == ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].r.eax
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ebx == ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].r.ebx
+ && ((ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ecx & 0xffffff00)
+ == (ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].r.ecx & 0xffffff00))
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.edx == ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].r.edx)
+ {
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].q.ecx_last = ecx;
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Do not store zero results. All-zero values usually mean that the
+ subleaf is unsupported. */
+ if (ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.eax == 0
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ebx == 0
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ecx == 0
+ && ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.edx == 0)
+ return true;
+
+ /* The result needs to be stored. Fill in the query parameters and
+ consume the storage. */
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].q.eax = eax;
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].q.ecx_first = ecx;
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].q.ecx_last = ecx;
+ ccd->qr[ccd->used].q.ecx_preserves_query_byte
+ = (ecx & 0xff) == (ccd->qr[ccd->used].r.ecx & 0xff);
+ ++ccd->used;
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Collected CPUID data into *CCD. If LIMIT, apply per-leaf limits to
+ avoid exceeding the pre-allocated space. Return true if all data
+ could be stored, false if the retrying without a limit is
+ requested. */
+static bool
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_collect_1 (struct cpuid_collected_data *ccd, bool limit)
+{
+ ccd->used = 0;
+ ccd->ecx_limit
+ = (limit ? cpuid_subleaf_limit : cpuid_initial_subleaf_limit) - 1;
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_store (ccd, 0x00, 0x00);
+ if (ccd->used == 0)
+ /* CPUID reported all 0. Should not happen. */
+ return true;
+ unsigned int maximum_leaf = ccd->qr[0x00].r.eax;
+ if (limit && maximum_leaf >= cpuid_main_leaf_limit)
+ maximum_leaf = cpuid_main_leaf_limit - 1;
+
+ for (unsigned int eax = 1; eax <= maximum_leaf; ++eax)
+ {
+ for (unsigned int ecx = 0; ecx <= ccd->ecx_limit; ++ecx)
+ if (!_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_store (ccd, eax, ecx))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (!_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_store (ccd, cpuid_extended_leaf_offset, 0x00))
+ return false;
+ maximum_leaf = ccd->qr[ccd->used - 1].r.eax;
+ if (maximum_leaf < cpuid_extended_leaf_offset)
+ /* No extended CPUID information. */
+ return true;
+ if (limit
+ && maximum_leaf - cpuid_extended_leaf_offset >= cpuid_main_leaf_limit)
+ maximum_leaf = cpuid_extended_leaf_offset + cpuid_main_leaf_limit - 1;
+ for (unsigned int eax = cpuid_extended_leaf_offset + 1;
+ eax <= maximum_leaf; ++eax)
+ {
+ for (unsigned int ecx = 0; ecx <= ccd->ecx_limit; ++ecx)
+ if (!_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_store (ccd, eax, ecx))
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Call _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_collect_1 twice if necessary, the
+ second time with the limit applied. */
+static void
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_collect (struct cpuid_collected_data *ccd)
+{
+ if (!_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_collect_1 (ccd, false))
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_collect_1 (ccd, true);
+
+ /* Re-use the result of the official feature probing here. */
+ const struct cpu_features *cpu_features = __get_cpu_features ();
+ if (CPU_FEATURES_CPU_P (cpu_features, OSXSAVE))
+ {
+ unsigned int xcrlow;
+ unsigned int xcrhigh;
+ asm ("xgetbv" : "=a" (xcrlow), "=d" (xcrhigh) : "c" (0));
+ ccd->xgetbv_ecx_0 = ((uint64_t) xcrhigh << 32) + xcrlow;
+ }
+ else
+ ccd->xgetbv_ecx_0 = 0;
+}
+
+/* Print a CPUID register value (passed as REG_VALUE) if it differs
+ from the expected REG_REFERENCE value. PROCESSOR_INDEX is the
+ process sequence number (always starting at zero; not a kernel ID). */
+static void
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_reg (unsigned int processor_index,
+ const struct cpuid_query *q,
+ const char *reg_label, unsigned int reg_value,
+ bool subleaf)
+{
+ if (subleaf)
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].cpuid.subleaf_eax[0x%x]"
+ ".ecx[0x%x].%s=0x%x\n",
+ processor_index, q->eax, q->ecx_first, reg_label, reg_value);
+ else
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].cpuid.eax[0x%x].%s=0x%x\n",
+ processor_index, q->eax, reg_label, reg_value);
+}
+
+/* Print CPUID result values in *RESULT for the query in
+ CCD->qr[CCD_IDX]. PROCESSOR_INDEX is the process sequence number
+ (always starting at zero; not a kernel ID). */
+static void
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_query (unsigned int processor_index,
+ struct cpuid_collected_data *ccd,
+ unsigned int ccd_idx,
+ const struct cpuid_registers *result)
+{
+ /* Treat this as a value if subleaves if ecx isn't zero (maybe
+ within the [ecx_fist, ecx_last] range), or if eax matches its
+ neighbors. If the range is [0, ecx_limit], then the subleaves
+ are not distinct (independently of ecx_preserves_query_byte),
+ so do not report them separately. */
+ struct cpuid_query *q = &ccd->qr[ccd_idx].q;
+ bool subleaf = (q->ecx_first > 0
+ || (q->ecx_first != q->ecx_last
+ && !(q->ecx_first == 0 && q->ecx_last == ccd->ecx_limit))
+ || (ccd_idx > 0 && q->eax == ccd->qr[ccd_idx - 1].q.eax)
+ || (ccd_idx + 1 < ccd->used
+ && q->eax == ccd->qr[ccd_idx + 1].q.eax));
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_reg (processor_index, q, "eax", result->eax,
+ subleaf);
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_reg (processor_index, q, "ebx", result->ebx,
+ subleaf);
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_reg (processor_index, q, "ecx", result->ecx,
+ subleaf);
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_reg (processor_index, q, "edx", result->edx,
+ subleaf);
+
+ if (subleaf && q->ecx_first != q->ecx_last)
+ {
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].cpuid.subleaf_eax[0x%x]"
+ ".ecx[0x%x].until_ecx=0x%x\n",
+ processor_index, q->eax, q->ecx_first, q->ecx_last);
+ if (q->ecx_preserves_query_byte)
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].cpuid.subleaf_eax[0x%x]"
+ ".ecx[0x%x].ecx_query_mask=0xff\n",
+ processor_index, q->eax, q->ecx_first);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Perform differential reporting of the data in *CURRENT against
+ *BASE. REQUESTED_CPU is the kernel CPU ID the thread was
+ configured to run on, or -1 if no configuration was possible.
+ PROCESSOR_INDEX is the process sequence number (always starting at
+ zero; not a kernel ID). */
+static void
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid_report (struct dl_iterate_cpu *dci,
+ struct cpuid_collected_data *current,
+ struct cpuid_collected_data *base)
+{
+ if (dci->requested_cpu >= 0)
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].requested=0x%x\n",
+ dci->processor_index, dci->requested_cpu);
+ if (dci->actual_cpu >= 0)
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].observed=0x%x\n",
+ dci->processor_index, dci->actual_cpu);
+ if (dci->actual_node >= 0)
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].observed_node=0x%x\n",
+ dci->processor_index, dci->actual_node);
+
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].cpuid_leaves=0x%x\n",
+ dci->processor_index, current->used);
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].ecx_limit=0x%x\n",
+ dci->processor_index, current->ecx_limit);
+
+ unsigned int base_idx = 0;
+ for (unsigned int current_idx = 0; current_idx < current->used;
+ ++current_idx)
+ {
+ /* Report missing data on the current CPU as 0. */
+ unsigned long long int current_query
+ = cpuid_query_combined (&current->qr[current_idx].q);
+ while (base_idx < base->used
+ && cpuid_query_combined (&base->qr[base_idx].q) < current_query)
+ {
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_query (dci->processor_index,
+ base, base_idx,
+ &cpuid_registers_zero);
+ ++base_idx;
+ }
+
+ if (base_idx < base->used
+ && cpuid_query_combined (&base->qr[base_idx].q) == current_query)
+ {
+ _Static_assert (sizeof (struct cpuid_registers) == 4 * 4,
+ "no padding in struct cpuid_registers");
+ if (current->qr[current_idx].q.ecx_last
+ != base->qr[base_idx].q.ecx_last
+ || memcmp (&current->qr[current_idx].r,
+ &base->qr[base_idx].r,
+ sizeof (struct cpuid_registers)) != 0)
+ /* The ECX range or the values have changed. Show the
+ new values. */
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_query (dci->processor_index,
+ current, current_idx,
+ &current->qr[current_idx].r);
+ ++base_idx;
+ }
+ else
+ /* Data is absent in the base reference. Report the new data. */
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_print_query (dci->processor_index,
+ current, current_idx,
+ &current->qr[current_idx].r);
+ }
+
+ if (current->xgetbv_ecx_0 != base->xgetbv_ecx_0)
+ {
+ /* Re-use the 64-bit printing routine. */
+ _dl_printf ("x86.processor[0x%x].", dci->processor_index);
+ _dl_diagnostics_print_labeled_value ("xgetbv.ecx[0x0]",
+ current->xgetbv_ecx_0);
+ }
+}
+
+static void
+_dl_diagnostics_cpuid (void)
+{
+#if !HAS_CPUID
+ /* CPUID is not supported, so there is nothing to dump. */
+ if (__get_cpuid_max (0, 0) == 0)
+ return;
+#endif
+
+ struct dl_iterate_cpu dic;
+ _dl_iterate_cpu_init (&dic);
+
+ /* Two copies of the data are used. Data is written to the index
+ (dic.processor_index & 1). The previous version against which the
+ data dump is reported is at index !(processor_index & 1). */
+ struct cpuid_collected_data ccd[2];
+
+ /* The initial data is presumed to be all zero. Zero results are
+ not recorded. */
+ ccd[1].used = 0;
+ ccd[1].xgetbv_ecx_0 = 0;
+
+ /* Run the CPUID probing on a specific CPU. There are expected
+ differences for encoding core IDs and topology information in
+ CPUID output, but some firmware/kernel bugs also may result in
+ asymmetric data across CPUs in some cases. */
+ while (_dl_iterate_cpu_next (&dic))
+ {
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_collect (&ccd[dic.processor_index & 1]);
+ _dl_diagnostics_cpuid_report
+ (&dic, &ccd[dic.processor_index & 1],
+ &ccd[!(dic.processor_index & 1)]);
+ }
}