glibc/SOURCES/glibc-rh1746933-2.patch

38 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff

commit 3640758943c856268bc12a3307838c2a65d2f9ea
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon Feb 4 23:46:58 2019 +0000
Fix assertion in malloc.c:tcache_get.
One of the warnings that appears with -Wextra is "ordered comparison
of pointer with integer zero" in malloc.c:tcache_get, for the
assertion:
assert (tcache->entries[tc_idx] > 0);
Indeed, a "> 0" comparison does not make sense for
tcache->entries[tc_idx], which is a pointer. My guess is that
tcache->counts[tc_idx] is what's intended here, and this patch changes
the assertion accordingly.
Tested for x86_64.
* malloc/malloc.c (tcache_get): Compare tcache->counts[tc_idx]
with 0, not tcache->entries[tc_idx].
(cherry picked from commit 77dc0d8643aa99c92bf671352b0a8adde705896f)
diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
index 92239b3324584060..998879aededf0d7c 100644
--- a/malloc/malloc.c
+++ b/malloc/malloc.c
@@ -2948,7 +2948,7 @@ tcache_get (size_t tc_idx)
{
tcache_entry *e = tcache->entries[tc_idx];
assert (tc_idx < TCACHE_MAX_BINS);
- assert (tcache->entries[tc_idx] > 0);
+ assert (tcache->counts[tc_idx] > 0);
tcache->entries[tc_idx] = e->next;
--(tcache->counts[tc_idx]);
e->key = NULL;