glibc/SOURCES/glibc-rh1410154-2.patch

34 lines
1.2 KiB
Diff

commit ca136bb0a36d0a7056c926bfe5126873566efe40
Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 31 13:28:26 2019 +0100
Clarify purpose of assert in _dl_lookup_symbol_x
Only one of the currently defined flags is incompatible with versioned
symbol lookups, so it makes sense to check for that flag and not its
complement.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com>
Change-Id: I3384349cef90cfd91862ebc34a4053f0c0a99404
diff --git a/elf/dl-lookup.c b/elf/dl-lookup.c
index 1d046caf017b582b..efbdb8deb3c0a9d4 100644
--- a/elf/dl-lookup.c
+++ b/elf/dl-lookup.c
@@ -792,11 +792,9 @@ _dl_lookup_symbol_x (const char *undef_name, struct link_map *undef_map,
bump_num_relocations ();
- /* No other flag than DL_LOOKUP_ADD_DEPENDENCY or DL_LOOKUP_GSCOPE_LOCK
- is allowed if we look up a versioned symbol. */
- assert (version == NULL
- || (flags & ~(DL_LOOKUP_ADD_DEPENDENCY | DL_LOOKUP_GSCOPE_LOCK))
- == 0);
+ /* DL_LOOKUP_RETURN_NEWEST does not make sense for versioned
+ lookups. */
+ assert (version == NULL || !(flags & DL_LOOKUP_RETURN_NEWEST));
size_t i = 0;
if (__glibc_unlikely (skip_map != NULL))