glibc/glibc-RHEL-25531-3.patch

35 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From 272708884cb750f12f5c74a00e6620c19dc6d567 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:08:39 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Do not prefer ERMS for memset on Zen3+
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
For AMD Zen3+ architecture, the performance of the vectorized loop is
slightly better than ERMS.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu on Zen3.
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
---
sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
index f34d12846c..5a98f70364 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
+++ b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
@@ -1021,6 +1021,11 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
minimum value is fixed. */
rep_stosb_threshold = TUNABLE_GET (x86_rep_stosb_threshold,
long int, NULL);
+ if (cpu_features->basic.kind == arch_kind_amd
+ && !TUNABLE_IS_INITIALIZED (x86_rep_stosb_threshold))
+ /* For AMD Zen3+ architecture, the performance of the vectorized loop is
+ slightly better than ERMS. */
+ rep_stosb_threshold = SIZE_MAX;
TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_data_cache_size, data, 0, SIZE_MAX);
TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_shared_cache_size, shared, 0, SIZE_MAX);
--
2.39.3