glibc/SOURCES/glibc-upstream-2.39-20.patch

31 lines
1.2 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Normal View History

commit 6484a92698039c4a7a510f0214e22d067b0d78b3
Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Date: Thu Feb 8 10:08:39 2024 -0300
x86: Do not prefer ERMS for memset on Zen3+
For AMD Zen3+ architecture, the performance of the vectorized loop is
slightly better than ERMS.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu on Zen3.
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 272708884cb750f12f5c74a00e6620c19dc6d567)
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
index f34d12846caf9422..5a98f70364220da4 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
+++ b/sysdeps/x86/dl-cacheinfo.h
@@ -1021,6 +1021,11 @@ dl_init_cacheinfo (struct cpu_features *cpu_features)
minimum value is fixed. */
rep_stosb_threshold = TUNABLE_GET (x86_rep_stosb_threshold,
long int, NULL);
+ if (cpu_features->basic.kind == arch_kind_amd
+ && !TUNABLE_IS_INITIALIZED (x86_rep_stosb_threshold))
+ /* For AMD Zen3+ architecture, the performance of the vectorized loop is
+ slightly better than ERMS. */
+ rep_stosb_threshold = SIZE_MAX;
TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_data_cache_size, data, 0, SIZE_MAX);
TUNABLE_SET_WITH_BOUNDS (x86_shared_cache_size, shared, 0, SIZE_MAX);