6a0ae4aca3
Kevin Buettner).
129 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
129 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
From FEDORA_PATCHES Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
|
|
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:32:48 -0700
|
|
Subject: gdb-rhbz2042664-fix-sect_index_data-internal-error
|
|
|
|
;; Backport fix which fixes internal error due to libcc_s lacking a
|
|
;; .data section.
|
|
|
|
Fix GDB internal error by using text (instead of data) section offset
|
|
|
|
Fedora Rawhide is now using gcc-12.0. As part of updating to the
|
|
gcc-12.0 package set, Rawhide is also now using a version of libgcc_s
|
|
which lacks a .data section. This causes gdb to fail in the following
|
|
fashion while debugging a program (such as gdb) which uses libgcc_s:
|
|
|
|
(top-gdb) run
|
|
Starting program: rawhide-master/bld/gdb/gdb
|
|
...
|
|
objfiles.h:467: internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized
|
|
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
|
|
further debugging may prove unreliable.
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
I snipped the backtrace from the above output. Instead, here's a
|
|
portion of a backtrace obtained using GDB's backtrace command.
|
|
(Obviously, in order to obtain it, I used a GDB which has been patched
|
|
with this commit.)
|
|
|
|
#0 internal_error (
|
|
file=0xc6a508 "gdb/objfiles.h", line=467,
|
|
fmt=0xc6a4e8 "sect_index_data not initialized")
|
|
at gdbsupport/errors.cc:51
|
|
#1 0x00000000005f9651 in objfile::data_section_offset (this=0x4fa48f0)
|
|
at gdb/objfiles.h:467
|
|
#2 0x000000000097c5f8 in relocate_address (address=0x17244, objfile=0x4fa48f0)
|
|
at gdb/stap-probe.c:1333
|
|
#3 0x000000000097c630 in stap_probe::get_relocated_address (this=0xa1a17a0,
|
|
objfile=0x4fa48f0)
|
|
at gdb/stap-probe.c:1341
|
|
#4 0x00000000004d7025 in create_exception_master_breakpoint_probe (
|
|
objfile=0x4fa48f0)
|
|
at gdb/breakpoint.c:3505
|
|
#5 0x00000000004d7426 in create_exception_master_breakpoint ()
|
|
at gdb/breakpoint.c:3575
|
|
#6 0x00000000004efcc1 in breakpoint_re_set ()
|
|
at gdb/breakpoint.c:13407
|
|
#7 0x0000000000956998 in solib_add (pattern=0x0, from_tty=0, readsyms=1)
|
|
at gdb/solib.c:1001
|
|
#8 0x00000000009576a8 in handle_solib_event ()
|
|
at gdb/solib.c:1269
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
The function 'relocate_address' in gdb/stap-probe.c attempts to do
|
|
its "relocation" by using objfile->data_section_offset(). That
|
|
method, data_section_offset() is defined as follows in objfiles.h:
|
|
|
|
CORE_ADDR data_section_offset () const
|
|
{
|
|
return section_offsets[SECT_OFF_DATA (this)];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The internal error occurs when the SECT_OFF_DATA macro finds that the
|
|
'sect_index_data' field is -1:
|
|
|
|
#define SECT_OFF_DATA(objfile) \
|
|
((objfile->sect_index_data == -1) \
|
|
? (internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, \
|
|
_("sect_index_data not initialized")), -1) \
|
|
: objfile->sect_index_data)
|
|
|
|
relocate_address() is obtaining the section offset in order to compute
|
|
a relocated address. For some ABIs, such as the System V ABI, the
|
|
section offsets will all be the same. So for those ABIs, it doesn't
|
|
matter which offset is used. However, other ABIs, such as the FDPIC
|
|
ABI, will have different offsets for the various sections. Thus, for
|
|
those ABIs, it is vital that this and other relocation code use the
|
|
correct offset.
|
|
|
|
In stap_probe::get_relocated_address, the address to which to add the
|
|
offset (thus forming the relocated address) is obtained via
|
|
this->get_address (); get_address is a getter for m_address in
|
|
probe.h. It's documented/defined as follows (also in probe.h):
|
|
|
|
/* The address where the probe is inserted, relative to
|
|
SECT_OFF_TEXT. */
|
|
CORE_ADDR m_address;
|
|
|
|
(Thanks to Tom Tromey for this observation.)
|
|
|
|
So, based on this, the current use of data_section_offset /
|
|
SECT_OFF_DATA is wrong. This relocation code should have been using
|
|
text_section_offset / SECT_OFF_TEXT all along. That being the
|
|
case, I've adjusted the stap-probe.c relocation code accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Searching the sources turned up one other use of data_section_offset,
|
|
in gdb/dtrace-probe.c, so I've updated that code as well. The same
|
|
reasoning presented above applies to this case too.
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
|
|
|
* gdb/dtrace-probe.c (dtrace_probe::get_relocated_address):
|
|
Use method text_section_offset instead of data_section_offset.
|
|
* gdb/stap-probe.c (relocate_address): Likewise.
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/gdb/dtrace-probe.c b/gdb/dtrace-probe.c
|
|
--- a/gdb/dtrace-probe.c
|
|
+++ b/gdb/dtrace-probe.c
|
|
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ dtrace_probe::is_enabled () const
|
|
CORE_ADDR
|
|
dtrace_probe::get_relocated_address (struct objfile *objfile)
|
|
{
|
|
- return this->get_address () + objfile->data_section_offset ();
|
|
+ return this->get_address () + objfile->text_section_offset ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Implementation of the get_argument_count method. */
|
|
diff --git a/gdb/stap-probe.c b/gdb/stap-probe.c
|
|
--- a/gdb/stap-probe.c
|
|
+++ b/gdb/stap-probe.c
|
|
@@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ stap_probe::parse_arguments (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
|
|
static CORE_ADDR
|
|
relocate_address (CORE_ADDR address, struct objfile *objfile)
|
|
{
|
|
- return address + objfile->data_section_offset ();
|
|
+ return address + objfile->text_section_offset ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Implementation of the get_relocated_address method. */
|