diff --git a/gdb-archer.patch b/gdb-archer.patch index 178cae0..6257740 100644 --- a/gdb-archer.patch +++ b/gdb-archer.patch @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ProjectArcher http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ArcherBranchManagement GIT snapshot: -commit ec29855686f2a78d90ebcc63765681249bbbe808 +commit a99e30d08ade4a2df0f943b036cd653bcd12b04d branch `archer' - the merge of branches: archer-jankratochvil-merge-expr @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ index 8f0140c..d451769 100644 /* Set BLOCK's using member to USING; if needed, allocate memory via diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c -index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 +index b23b294..531c43d 100644 --- a/gdb/breakpoint.c +++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static int is_hardware_watchpoint (struct breakpoint *bpt); @@ -1344,7 +1344,65 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 static int hw_breakpoint_used_count (void) { -@@ -5310,8 +5604,6 @@ create_breakpoints (struct symtabs_and_lines sals, char **addr_string, +@@ -5188,7 +5482,6 @@ expand_line_sal_maybe (struct symtab_and_line sal) + struct symtabs_and_lines expanded; + CORE_ADDR original_pc = sal.pc; + char *original_function = NULL; +- int found; + int i; + + /* If we have explicit pc, don't expand. +@@ -5264,14 +5557,42 @@ expand_line_sal_maybe (struct symtab_and_line sal) + + if (original_pc) + { +- found = 0; ++ /* Find all the other PCs for a line of code with multiple instances ++ (locations). If the instruction is in the middle of an instruction ++ block for source line GDB cannot safely find the same instruction in ++ the other compiled instances of the same source line because the other ++ instances may have been compiled completely differently. ++ ++ The testcase gdb.cp/expand-sals.exp shows that breaking at the return ++ address in a caller of the current frame works for the current ++ instance but the breakpoint cannot catch the point (instruction) where ++ the callee returns in the other compiled instances of this source line. ++ ++ The current implementation will place the breakpoint at the expected ++ returning address of the current instance of the caller. But the ++ other instances will get the breakpoint at the first instruction of ++ the source line - therefore before the call would be made. Another ++ possibility would be to place the breakpoint in the other instances at ++ the start of the next source line. ++ ++ A possible heuristics would compare the instructions length of each of ++ the instances of the current source line and if it matches it would ++ place the breakpoint at the same offset. Unfortunately a mistaken ++ guess would possibly crash the inferior. */ ++ ++ CORE_ADDR best = -1; ++ ++ /* Find the nearest preceding PC and set it to ORIGINAL_PC. */ + for (i = 0; i < expanded.nelts; ++i) +- if (expanded.sals[i].pc == original_pc) +- { +- found = 1; +- break; +- } +- gdb_assert (found); ++ if (expanded.sals[i].pc <= original_pc ++ && (best == -1 || expanded.sals[best].pc < expanded.sals[i].pc)) ++ best = i; ++ ++ if (best == -1) ++ error (_("Cannot find the best address for %s out of the %d locations"), ++ paddr (original_pc), expanded.nelts); ++ ++ expanded.sals[best].pc = original_pc; + } + + return expanded; +@@ -5310,8 +5631,6 @@ create_breakpoints (struct symtabs_and_lines sals, char **addr_string, cond_string, type, disposition, thread, ignore_count, ops, from_tty, enabled); } @@ -1353,7 +1411,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 } /* Parse ARG which is assumed to be a SAL specification possibly -@@ -5637,7 +5929,6 @@ break_command_really (char *arg, char *cond_string, int thread, +@@ -5637,7 +5956,6 @@ break_command_really (char *arg, char *cond_string, int thread, b->ops = ops; b->enable_state = enabled ? bp_enabled : bp_disabled; @@ -1361,7 +1419,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 mention (b); } -@@ -5649,6 +5940,11 @@ break_command_really (char *arg, char *cond_string, int thread, +@@ -5649,6 +5967,11 @@ break_command_really (char *arg, char *cond_string, int thread, discard_cleanups (breakpoint_chain); /* But cleanup everything else. */ do_cleanups (old_chain); @@ -1373,7 +1431,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 } /* Set a breakpoint. -@@ -6131,7 +6427,7 @@ can_use_hardware_watchpoint (struct value *v) +@@ -6131,7 +6454,7 @@ can_use_hardware_watchpoint (struct value *v) || (TYPE_CODE (vtype) != TYPE_CODE_STRUCT && TYPE_CODE (vtype) != TYPE_CODE_ARRAY)) { @@ -1382,7 +1440,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type (v)); if (!TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT (vaddr, len)) -@@ -6668,6 +6964,122 @@ catch_ada_exception_command (char *arg, int from_tty, +@@ -6668,6 +6991,122 @@ catch_ada_exception_command (char *arg, int from_tty, from_tty); } @@ -1505,7 +1563,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 /* Implement the "catch assert" command. */ static void -@@ -7134,6 +7546,7 @@ delete_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *bpt) +@@ -7134,6 +7573,7 @@ delete_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *bpt) xfree (bpt->source_file); if (bpt->exec_pathname != NULL) xfree (bpt->exec_pathname); @@ -1513,7 +1571,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 /* Be sure no bpstat's are pointing at it after it's been freed. */ /* FIXME, how can we find all bpstat's? -@@ -8041,6 +8454,56 @@ single_step_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (CORE_ADDR pc) +@@ -8041,6 +8481,56 @@ single_step_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (CORE_ADDR pc) return 0; } @@ -1570,7 +1628,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 /* This help string is used for the break, hbreak, tbreak and thbreak commands. It is defined as a macro to prevent duplication. -@@ -8073,6 +8536,8 @@ static void +@@ -8073,6 +8563,8 @@ static void add_catch_command (char *name, char *docstring, void (*sfunc) (char *args, int from_tty, struct cmd_list_element *command), @@ -1579,7 +1637,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 void *user_data_catch, void *user_data_tcatch) { -@@ -8082,11 +8547,13 @@ add_catch_command (char *name, char *docstring, +@@ -8082,11 +8574,13 @@ add_catch_command (char *name, char *docstring, &catch_cmdlist); set_cmd_sfunc (command, sfunc); set_cmd_context (command, user_data_catch); @@ -1593,7 +1651,7 @@ index b23b294..38a17a1 100644 } void -@@ -8361,36 +8828,50 @@ Set temporary catchpoints to catch events."), +@@ -8361,36 +8855,50 @@ Set temporary catchpoints to catch events."), Catch an exception, when caught.\n\ With an argument, catch only exceptions with the given name."), catch_catch_command, @@ -33471,6 +33529,171 @@ index 5e08768..8c8e038 100644 } proc do_tests {} { +diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/expand-sals.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/expand-sals.cc +new file mode 100644 +index 0000000..6169a05 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/expand-sals.cc +@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ ++/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger. ++ ++ Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++ ++ This file is part of GDB. ++ ++ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify ++ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by ++ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or ++ (at your option) any later version. ++ ++ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, ++ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of ++ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the ++ GNU General Public License for more details. ++ ++ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License ++ along with this program. If not, see . */ ++ ++int ++func () ++{ ++ return 42; /* func-line */ ++} ++ ++volatile int global_x; ++ ++class A ++{ ++public: ++ A () ++ { ++ global_x = func (); /* caller-line */ ++ } ++}; ++ ++/* class B is here just to make the `func' calling line above having multiple ++ instances - multiple locations. Template cannot be used as its instances ++ would have different function names which get discarded by GDB ++ expand_line_sal_maybe. */ ++ ++class B : public A ++{ ++}; ++ ++int ++main (void) ++{ ++ A a; ++ B b; ++ ++ return 0; /* exit-line */ ++} +diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/expand-sals.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/expand-sals.exp +new file mode 100644 +index 0000000..a2631fb +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/expand-sals.exp +@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ ++# Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++ ++# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify ++# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by ++# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or ++# (at your option) any later version. ++# ++# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, ++# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of ++# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the ++# GNU General Public License for more details. ++# ++# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License ++# along with this program. If not, see . ++ ++if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue } ++ ++set srcfile expand-sals.cc ++if { [prepare_for_testing expand-sals.exp expand-sals $srcfile {debug c++}] } { ++ return -1 ++} ++if ![runto_main] { ++ return -1 ++} ++ ++gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "exit-line"] ++ ++gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func-line"] ++gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "func" ".*func-line.*" ++ ++gdb_test "up" "caller-line.*" ++ ++# PC should not be at the boundary of source lines to make the original bug ++# exploitable. ++ ++set test "p/x \$pc" ++set pc {} ++gdb_test_multiple $test $test { ++ -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = (0x\[0-9a-f\]+)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { ++ set pc $expect_out(1,string) ++ pass $test ++ } ++} ++ ++set test "info line" ++set end {} ++gdb_test_multiple $test $test { ++ -re "Line \[0-9\]+ of .* starts at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+.* and ends at (0x\[0-9a-f\]+).*\\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { ++ set end $expect_out(1,string) ++ pass $test ++ } ++} ++ ++set test "caller line has trailing code" ++if {$pc != $end} { ++ pass $test ++} else { ++ fail $test ++} ++ ++# Original problem was an internal error here. Still sanity multiple locations ++# were found at this code place as otherwise this test would not test anything. ++set test "break" ++gdb_test_multiple $test $test { ++ -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at .*, line \[0-9\]+\\. \\(\[2-9\] locations\\)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { ++ pass $test ++ } ++ -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at .*, line \[0-9\]+\\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { ++ # It just could not be decided if GDB is OK by this testcase. ++ setup_xfail *-*-* ++ fail $test ++ return 0 ++ } ++} ++ ++gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "caller" ".*caller-line.*" ++ ++# Test GDB caught this return call and not the next one through B::B() ++gdb_test "bt" \ ++ "#0 \[^\r\n\]* A \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 \[^\r\n\]* main \[^\r\n\]*" \ ++ "bt from A" ++ ++gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "next caller instance" ".*caller-line.*" ++ ++# Test that GDB caught now already A through B::B() in the other instance. ++# As discussed in GDB expand_line_sal_maybe it would more match the original ++# instance behavior to catch here the `func' breakpoint and catch the ++# multiple-locations breakpoint only during the call return. This is not the ++# case, expecting here to catch the breakpoint before the call happens. ++ ++gdb_test "bt" \ ++ "#0 \[^\r\n\]* A \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 \[^\r\n\]* B \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#2 \[^\r\n\]* main \[^\r\n\]*" \ ++ "bt from B before the call" ++ ++gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "next caller func" ".*func-line.*" ++ ++# Verify GDB really could not catch the originally intended point of the return ++# from func. ++ ++gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "uncaught return" ".*exit-line.*" diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp index 77687a6..66d16cf 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp diff --git a/gdb.spec b/gdb.spec index da2730c..799c7ed 100644 --- a/gdb.spec +++ b/gdb.spec @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Version: 6.8.50.20090302 # The release always contains a leading reserved number, start it at 1. # `upstream' is not a part of `name' to stay fully rpm dependencies compatible for the testing. -Release: 7%{?_with_upstream:.upstream}%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?_with_upstream:.upstream}%{?dist} License: GPLv3+ Group: Development/Debuggers @@ -851,6 +851,10 @@ fi %endif %changelog +* Mon Mar 9 2009 Jan Kratochvil - 6.8.50.20090302-8 +- Archer update to the snapshot: a99e30d08ade4a2df0f943b036cd653bcd12b04d +- Fixes internal error on breaking at a multi-locations C++ caller (BZ 488572). + * Mon Mar 9 2009 Jan Kratochvil - 6.8.50.20090302-7 - Archer update to the snapshot: ec29855686f2a78d90ebcc63765681249bbbe808 - Temporarily place libstdc++ pretty printers in this gdb.rpm.