gcc-toolset-10-gdb/SOURCES/gdb-rhbz1844458-use-fputX_unfiltered.patch

123 lines
4.0 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

2020-11-03 12:10:56 +00:00
From FEDORA_PATCHES Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:33:47 -0700
Subject: gdb-rhbz1844458-use-fputX_unfiltered.patch
;; Fix fput?_unfiltered functions
;; RH BZ 1844458 (Sergio Durigan Junior and Tom Tromey)
2021-05-18 06:56:49 +00:00
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:40:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Make '{putchar,fputc}_unfiltered' use 'fputs_unfiltered'
2020-11-03 12:10:56 +00:00
There is currently a regression when using
'{putchar,fputc}_unfiltered' with 'puts_unfiltered' which was
introduced by one of the commits that reworked the unfiltered print
code.
The regression makes it impossible to use '{putchar,fputc}_unfiltered'
with 'puts_unfiltered', because the former writes directly to the
ui_file stream using 'stream->write', while the latter uses a buffered
mechanism (see 'wrap_buffer') and delays the printing.
If you do a quick & dirty hack on e.g. top.c:show_gdb_datadir:
@@ -2088,6 +2088,13 @@ static void
show_gdb_datadir (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty,
struct cmd_list_element *c, const char *value)
{
+ putchar_unfiltered ('\n');
+ puts_unfiltered ("TEST");
+ putchar_unfiltered ('>');
+ puts_unfiltered ("PUTS");
+ puts_unfiltered ("PUTS");
+ putchar_unfiltered ('\n');
rebuild GDB and invoke the "show data-directory" command, you will
see:
(gdb) show data-directory
>
TESTPUTSGDB's data directory is "/usr/local/share/gdb".
Note how the '>' was printed before the output, and "TEST" and "PUTS"
were printed together.
My first attempt to fix this was to always call 'flush_wrap_buffer' at
the end of 'fputs_maybe_filtered', since it seemed to me that the
function should always print what was requested. But I wasn't sure
this was the right thing to do, so I talked to Tom on IRC and he gave
me another, simpler idea: make '{putchar,fputc}_unfiltered' call into
the already existing 'fputs_unfiltered' function.
This patch implements the idea. I regtested it on the Buildbot, and
no regressions were detected.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-02-20 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* utils.c (fputs_maybe_filtered): Call 'stream->puts' instead
of 'fputc_unfiltered'.
(putchar_unfiltered): Call 'fputc_unfiltered'.
(fputc_unfiltered): Call 'fputs_unfiltered'.
diff --git a/gdb/utils.c b/gdb/utils.c
--- a/gdb/utils.c
+++ b/gdb/utils.c
@@ -1783,7 +1783,12 @@ fputs_maybe_filtered (const char *linebuffer, struct ui_file *stream,
newline -- if chars_per_line is right, we
probably just overflowed anyway; if it's wrong,
let us keep going. */
- fputc_unfiltered ('\n', stream);
+ /* XXX: The ideal thing would be to call
+ 'stream->putc' here, but we can't because it
+ currently calls 'fputc_unfiltered', which ends up
+ calling us, which generates an infinite
+ recursion. */
+ stream->puts ("\n");
}
else
{
@@ -1828,7 +1833,12 @@ fputs_maybe_filtered (const char *linebuffer, struct ui_file *stream,
wrap_here ((char *) 0); /* Spit out chars, cancel
further wraps. */
lines_printed++;
- fputc_unfiltered ('\n', stream);
+ /* XXX: The ideal thing would be to call
+ 'stream->putc' here, but we can't because it
+ currently calls 'fputc_unfiltered', which ends up
+ calling us, which generates an infinite
+ recursion. */
+ stream->puts ("\n");
lineptr++;
}
}
@@ -1923,10 +1933,7 @@ fputs_highlighted (const char *str, const compiled_regex &highlight,
int
putchar_unfiltered (int c)
{
- char buf = c;
-
- ui_file_write (gdb_stdout, &buf, 1);
- return c;
+ return fputc_unfiltered (c, gdb_stdout);
}
/* Write character C to gdb_stdout using GDB's paging mechanism and return C.
@@ -1941,9 +1948,11 @@ putchar_filtered (int c)
int
fputc_unfiltered (int c, struct ui_file *stream)
{
- char buf = c;
+ char buf[2];
- ui_file_write (stream, &buf, 1);
+ buf[0] = c;
+ buf[1] = 0;
+ fputs_unfiltered (buf, stream);
return c;
}