frr/0020-CVE-2023-47234.patch

From c37119df45bbf4ef713bc10475af2ee06e12f3bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 22:44:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] bgpd: Ignore handling NLRIs if we received MP_UNREACH_NLRI

If we receive MP_UNREACH_NLRI, we should stop handling remaining NLRIs if
no mandatory path attributes received.

In other words, if MP_UNREACH_NLRI received, the remaining NLRIs should be handled
as a new data, but without mandatory attributes, it's a malformed packet.

In normal case, this MUST not happen at all, but to avoid crashing bgpd, we MUST
handle that.

Reported-by: Iggy Frankovic <iggyfran@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
---
 bgpd/bgp_attr.c   | 19 ++++++++++---------
 bgpd/bgp_attr.h   |  1 +
 bgpd/bgp_packet.c |  7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_attr.c b/bgpd/bgp_attr.c
index 1473dc772502..75aa2ac7cce6 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_attr.c
+++ b/bgpd/bgp_attr.c
@@ -3399,15 +3399,6 @@ static int bgp_attr_check(struct peer *peer, struct attr *attr,
 	if (CHECK_FLAG(peer->cap, PEER_CAP_RESTART_RCV) && !attr->flag)
 		return BGP_ATTR_PARSE_PROCEED;
 
-	/* "An UPDATE message that contains the MP_UNREACH_NLRI is not required
-	   to carry any other path attributes.", though if MP_REACH_NLRI or NLRI
-	   are present, it should.  Check for any other attribute being present
-	   instead.
-	 */
-	if ((!CHECK_FLAG(attr->flag, ATTR_FLAG_BIT(BGP_ATTR_MP_REACH_NLRI)) &&
-	     CHECK_FLAG(attr->flag, ATTR_FLAG_BIT(BGP_ATTR_MP_UNREACH_NLRI))))
-		return BGP_ATTR_PARSE_PROCEED;
-
 	if (!CHECK_FLAG(attr->flag, ATTR_FLAG_BIT(BGP_ATTR_ORIGIN)))
 		type = BGP_ATTR_ORIGIN;
 
@@ -3426,6 +3417,16 @@ static int bgp_attr_check(struct peer *peer, struct attr *attr,
 	    && !CHECK_FLAG(attr->flag, ATTR_FLAG_BIT(BGP_ATTR_LOCAL_PREF)))
 		type = BGP_ATTR_LOCAL_PREF;
 
+	/* An UPDATE message that contains the MP_UNREACH_NLRI is not required
+	 * to carry any other path attributes. Though if MP_REACH_NLRI or NLRI
+	 * are present, it should. Check for any other attribute being present
+	 * instead.
+	 */
+	if (!CHECK_FLAG(attr->flag, ATTR_FLAG_BIT(BGP_ATTR_MP_REACH_NLRI)) &&
+	    CHECK_FLAG(attr->flag, ATTR_FLAG_BIT(BGP_ATTR_MP_UNREACH_NLRI)))
+		return type ? BGP_ATTR_PARSE_MISSING_MANDATORY
+			    : BGP_ATTR_PARSE_PROCEED;
+
 	/* If any of the well-known mandatory attributes are not present
 	 * in an UPDATE message, then "treat-as-withdraw" MUST be used.
 	 */
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_attr.h b/bgpd/bgp_attr.h
index fc347e7a1b4b..d30155e6dba0 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_attr.h
+++ b/bgpd/bgp_attr.h
@@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ enum bgp_attr_parse_ret {
 	   */
 	BGP_ATTR_PARSE_ERROR_NOTIFYPLS = -3,
 	BGP_ATTR_PARSE_EOR = -4,
+	BGP_ATTR_PARSE_MISSING_MANDATORY = -4,
 } bgp_attr_parse_ret_t;
 
 struct bpacket_attr_vec_arr;
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_packet.c b/bgpd/bgp_packet.c
index a7514a26aa64..5dc35157ebf6 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_packet.c
+++ b/bgpd/bgp_packet.c
@@ -2359,7 +2359,12 @@ static int bgp_update_receive(struct peer_connection *connection,
 	/* Network Layer Reachability Information. */
 	update_len = end - stream_pnt(s);
 
-	if (update_len) {
+	/* If we received MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute, but also NLRIs, then
+	 * NLRIs should be handled as a new data. Though, if we received
+	 * NLRIs without mandatory attributes, they should be ignored.
+	 */
+	if (update_len && attribute_len &&
+	    attr_parse_ret != BGP_ATTR_PARSE_MISSING_MANDATORY) {
 		/* Set NLRI portion to structure. */
 		nlris[NLRI_UPDATE].afi = AFI_IP;
 		nlris[NLRI_UPDATE].safi = SAFI_UNICAST;