emacs/emacs-24-0015-ELF-unexec-R_-_NONE-relocs.patch
2016-02-15 10:28:00 +01:00

59 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

From f9d91515971443b754b9c9eaac45a293d0e620c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 09:29:00 -0800
Subject: ELF unexec: R_*_NONE relocs
Emacs should build on ppc64el. A problem with the bss has been fixed.
This upstream patch has been added [6/10]:
ELF unexec: R_*_NONE relocs
These should be ignored on all targets.
* unexelf.c (unexec): Ignore R_*_NONE relocs for any target,
not just Alpha. Comment on reloc size assumption.
Origin: upstream, commit: 8285c2ab8050de218c0c06182659ee0a7b23a0f6
Bug: http://debbugs.gnu.org/20614
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/808347
Added-by: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
---
src/unexelf.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: emacs-24.5/src/unexelf.c
===================================================================
--- emacs-24.5.orig/src/unexelf.c
+++ emacs-24.5/src/unexelf.c
@@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ temacs:
}
/* This loop seeks out relocation sections for the data section, so
- that it can undo relocations performed by the runtime linker. */
+ that it can undo relocations performed by the runtime loader. */
for (n = new_file_h->e_shnum; 0 < --n; )
{
ElfW (Shdr) *rel_shdr = &NEW_SECTION_H (n);
@@ -1236,14 +1236,14 @@ temacs:
reloc += rel_shdr->sh_entsize)
{
ElfW (Addr) addr = ((ElfW (Rel) *) reloc)->r_offset - offset;
-#ifdef __alpha__
- /* The Alpha ELF binutils currently have a bug that
- sometimes results in relocs that contain all
- zeroes. Work around this for now... */
+ /* Ignore R_*_NONE relocs. */
if (((ElfW (Rel) *) reloc)->r_offset == 0)
continue;
-#endif
- memcpy (new_base + addr, old_base + addr, sizeof (ElfW (Addr)));
+ /* Assume reloc applies to a word.
+ ??? This is not always true, eg. TLS module/index
+ pair in .got which occupies two words. */
+ memcpy (new_base + addr, old_base + addr,
+ sizeof (ElfW (Addr)));
}
}
break;