From e3e5128cf20660c0789f9b4e2285dbc1f35f6799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Soltys Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:17:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] 90mdraid: adjust stock mdadm udev rules Currently shipped mdadm rules incrementally assemble all imsm and native raids, and do so unconditionally. This causes few issues: - fine-grained controls in 65-md* are shadowed - for example, mdadm.conf's presence tests or uuid checks - 90dmraid might also conflict with 90mdraid, if user prefers the former to handle containers - possibly other subtle issues This patch adjusts the behaviour. Signed-off-by: Michal Soltys --- modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh b/modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh index de7785d..91a0769 100755 --- a/modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh +++ b/modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ install() { if [ ! -x /lib/udev/vol_id ]; then inst_rules 64-md-raid.rules + # remove incremental assembly from stock rules, so they don't shadow + # 65-md-inc*.rules and its fine-grained controls, or cause other problems + # when we explicitly don't want certain components to be incrementally + # assembled + sed -i -e '/^ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}==.*ACTION=="add".*RUN+="\/sbin\/mdadm --incremental $env{DEVNAME}"$/d' "${initdir}/lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules" fi inst_rules "$moddir/65-md-incremental-imsm.rules"