rpms/docbook-style-xsl
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity
66 Commits 7 Branches 9 Tags 153 KiB
7032971c3c
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ondrej Vasik
e80086cbd6 New upstream release 1.75.0, update marginleft patch 2009-05-11 09:46:36 +00:00
Kamil Dudka
f011aa50a2 Rediffed all patches to work with patch --fuzz=0 2008-08-06 11:56:12 +00:00
Ondrej Vasik
1d0b008972 change a few non-constant expressions to constant - needed for 
passivetex(#366441)
 2007-12-04 15:07:09 +00:00
Tim Waugh
1e8554d277 - 1.68.0. 2005-02-09 14:56:45 +00:00
Tim Waugh
78f96966cf - Prevent expressions in passivetex output from index.xsl (bug #142229). 2004-12-08 12:45:19 +00:00
Tim Waugh
853951e1f2 - 1.67.2. 
- No longer need nbsp or listblock patches.
 2004-12-02 23:04:01 +00:00
Tim Waugh
2ada51e5ef - 1.66.1 (bug #133586). 2004-11-02 17:14:17 +00:00
cvsdist
93160b5fcc auto-import changelog data from docbook-style-xsl-1.64.1-6.src.rpm 
Tue Jan 20 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.1-6
- Fix last margin-left fix (bug #113456).
- Reduce instances of itemized/ordered lists having misalignments.
Sun Jan 18 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.1-5
- And another (bug #113456).
Thu Jan 15 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.1-4
- Fixed another instance of bug #113456 in lists layout.
Wed Jan 14 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.1-3
- Hard-code the margin-left work around to expect passivetex (bug #113456).
Wed Dec 24 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.1-2
- Another manpage fix.
Fri Dec 19 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.1-1
- 1.64.1.
Thu Dec 18 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.0-2
- Another manpage fix.
Tue Dec 16 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.64.0-1
- 1.64.0.
Fri Dec 12 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.62.4-3
- Use the fr.xml from 1.62.1 (bug #111989).
Thu Dec 11 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.62.4-2
- Manpages fixes.
Thu Dec 11 2003 Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> 1.62.4-1
- 1.62.4.
- No longer need hyphens patch.
- Avoid expressions in margin-left attributes, since passivetex does not
    understand them.
 2004-09-09 04:21:07 +00:00