2683 lines
104 KiB
Groff
2683 lines
104 KiB
Groff
|
.\" dhcpd.conf.5
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.\" Copyright (c) 2004-2007 by Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
|
||
|
.\" Copyright (c) 1996-2003 by Internet Software Consortium
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.\" Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
|
||
|
.\" purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
|
||
|
.\" copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.\" THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ISC DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
|
||
|
.\" WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
|
||
|
.\" MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL ISC BE LIABLE FOR
|
||
|
.\" ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
|
||
|
.\" WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
|
||
|
.\" ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT
|
||
|
.\" OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.\" Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
|
||
|
.\" 950 Charter Street
|
||
|
.\" Redwood City, CA 94063
|
||
|
.\" <info@isc.org>
|
||
|
.\" http://www.isc.org/
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.\" This software has been written for Internet Systems Consortium
|
||
|
.\" by Ted Lemon in cooperation with Vixie Enterprises and Nominum, Inc.
|
||
|
.\" To learn more about Internet Systems Consortium, see
|
||
|
.\" ``http://www.isc.org/''. To learn more about Vixie Enterprises,
|
||
|
.\" see ``http://www.vix.com''. To learn more about Nominum, Inc., see
|
||
|
.\" ``http://www.nominum.com''.
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.\" $Id: dhcpd.conf.5,v 1.80.4.5 2007/05/23 23:30:33 each Exp $
|
||
|
.\"
|
||
|
.TH dhcpd.conf 5
|
||
|
.SH NAME
|
||
|
dhcpd.conf - dhcpd configuration file
|
||
|
.SH DESCRIPTION
|
||
|
The dhcpd.conf file contains configuration information for
|
||
|
.IR dhcpd,
|
||
|
the Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The dhcpd.conf file is a free-form ASCII text file. It is parsed by
|
||
|
the recursive-descent parser built into dhcpd. The file may contain
|
||
|
extra tabs and newlines for formatting purposes. Keywords in the file
|
||
|
are case-insensitive. Comments may be placed anywhere within the
|
||
|
file (except within quotes). Comments begin with the # character and
|
||
|
end at the end of the line.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The file essentially consists of a list of statements. Statements
|
||
|
fall into two broad categories - parameters and declarations.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Parameter statements either say how to do something (e.g., how long a
|
||
|
lease to offer), whether to do something (e.g., should dhcpd provide
|
||
|
addresses to unknown clients), or what parameters to provide to the
|
||
|
client (e.g., use gateway 220.177.244.7).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Declarations are used to describe the topology of the
|
||
|
network, to describe clients on the network, to provide addresses that
|
||
|
can be assigned to clients, or to apply a group of parameters to a
|
||
|
group of declarations. In any group of parameters and declarations,
|
||
|
all parameters must be specified before any declarations which depend
|
||
|
on those parameters may be specified.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Declarations about network topology include the \fIshared-network\fR
|
||
|
and the \fIsubnet\fR declarations. If clients on a subnet are to be
|
||
|
assigned addresses
|
||
|
dynamically, a \fIrange\fR declaration must appear within the
|
||
|
\fIsubnet\fR declaration. For clients with statically assigned
|
||
|
addresses, or for installations where only known clients will be
|
||
|
served, each such client must have a \fIhost\fR declaration. If
|
||
|
parameters are to be applied to a group of declarations which are not
|
||
|
related strictly on a per-subnet basis, the \fIgroup\fR declaration
|
||
|
can be used.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
For every subnet which will be served, and for every subnet
|
||
|
to which the dhcp server is connected, there must be one \fIsubnet\fR
|
||
|
declaration, which tells dhcpd how to recognize that an address is on
|
||
|
that subnet. A \fIsubnet\fR declaration is required for each subnet
|
||
|
even if no addresses will be dynamically allocated on that subnet.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Some installations have physical networks on which more than one IP
|
||
|
subnet operates. For example, if there is a site-wide requirement
|
||
|
that 8-bit subnet masks be used, but a department with a single
|
||
|
physical ethernet network expands to the point where it has more than
|
||
|
254 nodes, it may be necessary to run two 8-bit subnets on the same
|
||
|
ethernet until such time as a new physical network can be added. In
|
||
|
this case, the \fIsubnet\fR declarations for these two networks must be
|
||
|
enclosed in a \fIshared-network\fR declaration.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Some sites may have departments which have clients on more than one
|
||
|
subnet, but it may be desirable to offer those clients a uniform set
|
||
|
of parameters which are different than what would be offered to
|
||
|
clients from other departments on the same subnet. For clients which
|
||
|
will be declared explicitly with \fIhost\fR declarations, these
|
||
|
declarations can be enclosed in a \fIgroup\fR declaration along with
|
||
|
the parameters which are common to that department. For clients
|
||
|
whose addresses will be dynamically assigned, class declarations and
|
||
|
conditional declarations may be used to group parameter assignments
|
||
|
based on information the client sends.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When a client is to be booted, its boot parameters are determined by
|
||
|
consulting that client's \fIhost\fR declaration (if any), and then
|
||
|
consulting any \fIclass\fR declarations matching the client,
|
||
|
followed by the \fIpool\fR, \fIsubnet\fR and \fIshared-network\fR
|
||
|
declarations for the IP address assigned to the client. Each of
|
||
|
these declarations itself appears within a lexical scope, and all
|
||
|
declarations at less specific lexical scopes are also consulted for
|
||
|
client option declarations. Scopes are never considered
|
||
|
twice, and if parameters are declared in more than one scope, the
|
||
|
parameter declared in the most specific scope is the one that is
|
||
|
used.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When dhcpd tries to find a \fIhost\fR declaration for a client, it
|
||
|
first looks for a \fIhost\fR declaration which has a
|
||
|
\fIfixed-address\fR declaration that lists an IP address that is valid
|
||
|
for the subnet or shared network on which the client is booting. If
|
||
|
it doesn't find any such entry, it tries to find an entry which has
|
||
|
no \fIfixed-address\fR declaration.
|
||
|
.SH EXAMPLES
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
A typical dhcpd.conf file will look something like this:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
|
||
|
.I global parameters...
|
||
|
|
||
|
subnet 204.254.239.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
|
||
|
\fIsubnet-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
range 204.254.239.10 204.254.239.30;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
subnet 204.254.239.32 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
|
||
|
\fIsubnet-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
range 204.254.239.42 204.254.239.62;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
subnet 204.254.239.64 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
|
||
|
\fIsubnet-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
range 204.254.239.74 204.254.239.94;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
group {
|
||
|
\fIgroup-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
host zappo.test.isc.org {
|
||
|
\fIhost-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
host beppo.test.isc.org {
|
||
|
\fIhost-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
host harpo.test.isc.org {
|
||
|
\fIhost-specific parameters...\fR
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
.ce 1
|
||
|
Figure 1
|
||
|
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Notice that at the beginning of the file, there's a place
|
||
|
for global parameters. These might be things like the organization's
|
||
|
domain name, the addresses of the name servers (if they are common to
|
||
|
the entire organization), and so on. So, for example:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
|
||
|
option domain-name "isc.org";
|
||
|
option domain-name-servers ns1.isc.org, ns2.isc.org;
|
||
|
|
||
|
.ce 1
|
||
|
Figure 2
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
As you can see in Figure 2, you can specify host addresses in
|
||
|
parameters using their domain names rather than their numeric IP
|
||
|
addresses. If a given hostname resolves to more than one IP address
|
||
|
(for example, if that host has two ethernet interfaces), then where
|
||
|
possible, both addresses are supplied to the client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The most obvious reason for having subnet-specific parameters as
|
||
|
shown in Figure 1 is that each subnet, of necessity, has its own
|
||
|
router. So for the first subnet, for example, there should be
|
||
|
something like:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
|
||
|
option routers 204.254.239.1;
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Note that the address here is specified numerically. This is not
|
||
|
required - if you have a different domain name for each interface on
|
||
|
your router, it's perfectly legitimate to use the domain name for that
|
||
|
interface instead of the numeric address. However, in many cases
|
||
|
there may be only one domain name for all of a router's IP addresses, and
|
||
|
it would not be appropriate to use that name here.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In Figure 1 there is also a \fIgroup\fR statement, which provides
|
||
|
common parameters for a set of three hosts - zappo, beppo and harpo.
|
||
|
As you can see, these hosts are all in the test.isc.org domain, so it
|
||
|
might make sense for a group-specific parameter to override the domain
|
||
|
name supplied to these hosts:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
|
||
|
option domain-name "test.isc.org";
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Also, given the domain they're in, these are probably test machines.
|
||
|
If we wanted to test the DHCP leasing mechanism, we might set the
|
||
|
lease timeout somewhat shorter than the default:
|
||
|
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
max-lease-time 120;
|
||
|
default-lease-time 120;
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You may have noticed that while some parameters start with the
|
||
|
\fIoption\fR keyword, some do not. Parameters starting with the
|
||
|
\fIoption\fR keyword correspond to actual DHCP options, while
|
||
|
parameters that do not start with the option keyword either control
|
||
|
the behavior of the DHCP server (e.g., how long a lease dhcpd will
|
||
|
give out), or specify client parameters that are not optional in the
|
||
|
DHCP protocol (for example, server-name and filename).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In Figure 1, each host had \fIhost-specific parameters\fR. These
|
||
|
could include such things as the \fIhostname\fR option, the name of a
|
||
|
file to upload (the \fIfilename\fR parameter) and the address of the
|
||
|
server from which to upload the file (the \fInext-server\fR
|
||
|
parameter). In general, any parameter can appear anywhere that
|
||
|
parameters are allowed, and will be applied according to the scope in
|
||
|
which the parameter appears.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Imagine that you have a site with a lot of NCD X-Terminals. These
|
||
|
terminals come in a variety of models, and you want to specify the
|
||
|
boot files for each model. One way to do this would be to have host
|
||
|
declarations for each server and group them by model:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
|
||
|
group {
|
||
|
filename "Xncd19r";
|
||
|
next-server ncd-booter;
|
||
|
|
||
|
host ncd1 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:49:2b:57; }
|
||
|
host ncd4 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:80:fc:32; }
|
||
|
host ncd8 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:22:46:81; }
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
group {
|
||
|
filename "Xncd19c";
|
||
|
next-server ncd-booter;
|
||
|
|
||
|
host ncd2 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:88:2d:81; }
|
||
|
host ncd3 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:00:14:11; }
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
group {
|
||
|
filename "XncdHMX";
|
||
|
next-server ncd-booter;
|
||
|
|
||
|
host ncd1 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:11:90:23; }
|
||
|
host ncd4 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:91:a7:8; }
|
||
|
host ncd8 { hardware ethernet 0:c0:c3:cc:a:8f; }
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.SH ADDRESS POOLS
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.B pool
|
||
|
declaration can be used to specify a pool of addresses that will be
|
||
|
treated differently than another pool of addresses, even on the same
|
||
|
network segment or subnet. For example, you may want to provide a
|
||
|
large set of addresses that can be assigned to DHCP clients that are
|
||
|
registered to your DHCP server, while providing a smaller set of
|
||
|
addresses, possibly with short lease times, that are available for
|
||
|
unknown clients. If you have a firewall, you may be able to arrange
|
||
|
for addresses from one pool to be allowed access to the Internet,
|
||
|
while addresses in another pool are not, thus encouraging users to
|
||
|
register their DHCP clients. To do this, you would set up a pair of
|
||
|
pool declarations:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
|
||
|
option routers 10.0.0.254;
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Unknown clients get this pool.
|
||
|
pool {
|
||
|
option domain-name-servers bogus.example.com;
|
||
|
max-lease-time 300;
|
||
|
range 10.0.0.200 10.0.0.253;
|
||
|
allow unknown-clients;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Known clients get this pool.
|
||
|
pool {
|
||
|
option domain-name-servers ns1.example.com, ns2.example.com;
|
||
|
max-lease-time 28800;
|
||
|
range 10.0.0.5 10.0.0.199;
|
||
|
deny unknown-clients;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
It is also possible to set up entirely different subnets for known and
|
||
|
unknown clients - address pools exist at the level of shared networks,
|
||
|
so address ranges within pool declarations can be on different
|
||
|
subnets.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
As you can see in the preceding example, pools can have permit lists
|
||
|
that control which clients are allowed access to the pool and which
|
||
|
aren't. Each entry in a pool's permit list is introduced with the
|
||
|
.I allow
|
||
|
or \fIdeny\fR keyword. If a pool has a permit list, then only those
|
||
|
clients that match specific entries on the permit list will be
|
||
|
eligible to be assigned addresses from the pool. If a pool has a
|
||
|
deny list, then only those clients that do not match any entries on
|
||
|
the deny list will be eligible. If both permit and deny lists exist
|
||
|
for a pool, then only clients that match the permit list and do not
|
||
|
match the deny list will be allowed access.
|
||
|
.SH DYNAMIC ADDRESS ALLOCATION
|
||
|
Address allocation is actually only done when a client is in the INIT
|
||
|
state and has sent a DHCPDISCOVER message. If the client thinks it
|
||
|
has a valid lease and sends a DHCPREQUEST to initiate or renew that
|
||
|
lease, the server has only three choices - it can ignore the
|
||
|
DHCPREQUEST, send a DHCPNAK to tell the client it should stop using
|
||
|
the address, or send a DHCPACK, telling the client to go ahead and use
|
||
|
the address for a while.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the server finds the address the client is requesting, and that
|
||
|
address is available to the client, the server will send a DHCPACK.
|
||
|
If the address is no longer available, or the client isn't permitted
|
||
|
to have it, the server will send a DHCPNAK. If the server knows
|
||
|
nothing about the address, it will remain silent, unless the address
|
||
|
is incorrect for the network segment to which the client has been
|
||
|
attached and the server is authoritative for that network segment, in
|
||
|
which case the server will send a DHCPNAK even though it doesn't know
|
||
|
about the address.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
There may be a host declaration matching the client's identification.
|
||
|
If that host declaration contains a fixed-address declaration that
|
||
|
lists an IP address that is valid for the network segment to which the
|
||
|
client is connected. In this case, the DHCP server will never do
|
||
|
dynamic address allocation. In this case, the client is \fIrequired\fR
|
||
|
to take the address specified in the host declaration. If the
|
||
|
client sends a DHCPREQUEST for some other address, the server will respond
|
||
|
with a DHCPNAK.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When the DHCP server allocates a new address for a client (remember,
|
||
|
this only happens if the client has sent a DHCPDISCOVER), it first
|
||
|
looks to see if the client already has a valid lease on an IP address,
|
||
|
or if there is an old IP address the client had before that hasn't yet
|
||
|
been reassigned. In that case, the server will take that address and
|
||
|
check it to see if the client is still permitted to use it. If the
|
||
|
client is no longer permitted to use it, the lease is freed if the
|
||
|
server thought it was still in use - the fact that the client has sent
|
||
|
a DHCPDISCOVER proves to the server that the client is no longer using
|
||
|
the lease.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If no existing lease is found, or if the client is forbidden to
|
||
|
receive the existing lease, then the server will look in the list of
|
||
|
address pools for the network segment to which the client is attached
|
||
|
for a lease that is not in use and that the client is permitted to
|
||
|
have. It looks through each pool declaration in sequence (all
|
||
|
.I range
|
||
|
declarations that appear outside of pool declarations are grouped into
|
||
|
a single pool with no permit list). If the permit list for the pool
|
||
|
allows the client to be allocated an address from that pool, the pool
|
||
|
is examined to see if there is an address available. If so, then the
|
||
|
client is tentatively assigned that address. Otherwise, the next
|
||
|
pool is tested. If no addresses are found that can be assigned to
|
||
|
the client, no response is sent to the client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If an address is found that the client is permitted to have, and that
|
||
|
has never been assigned to any client before, the address is
|
||
|
immediately allocated to the client. If the address is available for
|
||
|
allocation but has been previously assigned to a different client, the
|
||
|
server will keep looking in hopes of finding an address that has never
|
||
|
before been assigned to a client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP server generates the list of available IP addresses from a
|
||
|
hash table. This means that the addresses are not sorted in any
|
||
|
particular order, and so it is not possible to predict the order in
|
||
|
which the DHCP server will allocate IP addresses. Users of previous
|
||
|
versions of the ISC DHCP server may have become accustomed to the DHCP
|
||
|
server allocating IP addresses in ascending order, but this is no
|
||
|
longer possible, and there is no way to configure this behavior with
|
||
|
version 3 of the ISC DHCP server.
|
||
|
.SH IP ADDRESS CONFLICT PREVENTION
|
||
|
The DHCP server checks IP addresses to see if they are in use before
|
||
|
allocating them to clients. It does this by sending an ICMP Echo
|
||
|
request message to the IP address being allocated. If no ICMP Echo
|
||
|
reply is received within a second, the address is assumed to be free.
|
||
|
This is only done for leases that have been specified in range
|
||
|
statements, and only when the lease is thought by the DHCP server to
|
||
|
be free - i.e., the DHCP server or its failover peer has not listed
|
||
|
the lease as in use.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If a response is received to an ICMP Echo request, the DHCP server
|
||
|
assumes that there is a configuration error - the IP address is in use
|
||
|
by some host on the network that is not a DHCP client. It marks the
|
||
|
address as abandoned, and will not assign it to clients.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If a DHCP client tries to get an IP address, but none are available,
|
||
|
but there are abandoned IP addresses, then the DHCP server will
|
||
|
attempt to reclaim an abandoned IP address. It marks one IP address
|
||
|
as free, and then does the same ICMP Echo request check described
|
||
|
previously. If there is no answer to the ICMP Echo request, the
|
||
|
address is assigned to the client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP server does not cycle through abandoned IP addresses if the
|
||
|
first IP address it tries to reclaim is free. Rather, when the next
|
||
|
DHCPDISCOVER comes in from the client, it will attempt a new
|
||
|
allocation using the same method described here, and will typically
|
||
|
try a new IP address.
|
||
|
.SH DHCP FAILOVER
|
||
|
This version of the ISC DHCP server supports the DHCP failover
|
||
|
protocol as documented in draft-ietf-dhc-failover-07.txt. This is
|
||
|
not a final protocol document, and we have not done interoperability
|
||
|
testing with other vendors' implementations of this protocol, so you
|
||
|
must not assume that this implementation conforms to the standard.
|
||
|
If you wish to use the failover protocol, make sure that both failover
|
||
|
peers are running the same version of the ISC DHCP server.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The failover protocol allows two DHCP servers (and no more than two)
|
||
|
to share a common address pool. Each server will have about half of
|
||
|
the available IP addresses in the pool at any given time for
|
||
|
allocation. If one server fails, the other server will continue to
|
||
|
renew leases out of the pool, and will allocate new addresses out of
|
||
|
the roughly half of available addresses that it had when
|
||
|
communications with the other server were lost.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
It is possible during a prolonged failure to tell the remaining server
|
||
|
that the other server is down, in which case the remaining server will
|
||
|
(over time) reclaim all the addresses the other server had available
|
||
|
for allocation, and begin to reuse them. This is called putting the
|
||
|
server into the PARTNER-DOWN state.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You can put the server into the PARTNER-DOWN state either by using the
|
||
|
.B omshell (1)
|
||
|
command or by stopping the server, editing the last peer state
|
||
|
declaration in the lease file, and restarting the server. If you use
|
||
|
this last method, be sure to leave the date and time of the start of
|
||
|
the state blank:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
.B failover peer "\fIname\fB" state {
|
||
|
.B my state partner-down;
|
||
|
.B peer state \fIstate\fB at \fIdate\fB;
|
||
|
.B }
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When the other server comes back online, it should automatically
|
||
|
detect that it has been offline and request a complete update from the
|
||
|
server that was running in the PARTNER-DOWN state, and then both
|
||
|
servers will resume processing together.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
It is possible to get into a dangerous situation: if you put one
|
||
|
server into the PARTNER-DOWN state, and then *that* server goes down,
|
||
|
and the other server comes back up, the other server will not know
|
||
|
that the first server was in the PARTNER-DOWN state, and may issue
|
||
|
addresses previously issued by the other server to different clients,
|
||
|
resulting in IP address conflicts. Before putting a server into
|
||
|
PARTNER-DOWN state, therefore, make
|
||
|
.I sure
|
||
|
that the other server will not restart automatically.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The failover protocol defines a primary server role and a secondary
|
||
|
server role. There are some differences in how primaries and
|
||
|
secondaries act, but most of the differences simply have to do with
|
||
|
providing a way for each peer to behave in the opposite way from the
|
||
|
other. So one server must be configured as primary, and the other
|
||
|
must be configured as secondary, and it doesn't matter too much which
|
||
|
one is which.
|
||
|
.SH FAILOVER STARTUP
|
||
|
When a server starts that has not previously communicated with its
|
||
|
failover peer, it must establish communications with its failover peer
|
||
|
and synchronize with it before it can serve clients. This can happen
|
||
|
either because you have just configured your DHCP servers to perform
|
||
|
failover for the first time, or because one of your failover servers
|
||
|
has failed catastrophically and lost its database.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The initial recovery process is designed to ensure that when one
|
||
|
failover peer loses its database and then resynchronizes, any leases
|
||
|
that the failed server gave out before it failed will be honored.
|
||
|
When the failed server starts up, it notices that it has no saved
|
||
|
failover state, and attempts to contact its peer.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When it has established contact, it asks the peer for a complete copy
|
||
|
its peer's lease database. The peer then sends its complete database,
|
||
|
and sends a message indicating that it is done. The failed server
|
||
|
then waits until MCLT has passed, and once MCLT has passed both
|
||
|
servers make the transition back into normal operation. This waiting
|
||
|
period ensures that any leases the failed server may have given out
|
||
|
while out of contact with its partner will have expired.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
While the failed server is recovering, its partner remains in the
|
||
|
partner-down state, which means that it is serving all clients. The
|
||
|
failed server provides no service at all to DHCP clients until it has
|
||
|
made the transition into normal operation.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In the case where both servers detect that they have never before
|
||
|
communicated with their partner, they both come up in this recovery
|
||
|
state and follow the procedure we have just described. In this case,
|
||
|
no service will be provided to DHCP clients until MCLT has expired.
|
||
|
.SH CONFIGURING FAILOVER
|
||
|
In order to configure failover, you need to write a peer declaration
|
||
|
that configures the failover protocol, and you need to write peer
|
||
|
references in each pool declaration for which you want to do
|
||
|
failover. You do not have to do failover for all pools on a given
|
||
|
network segment. You must not tell one server it's doing failover
|
||
|
on a particular address pool and tell the other it is not. You must
|
||
|
not have any common address pools on which you are not doing
|
||
|
failover. A pool declaration that utilizes failover would look like this:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
pool {
|
||
|
failover peer "foo";
|
||
|
deny dynamic bootp clients;
|
||
|
\fIpool specific parameters\fR
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Dynamic BOOTP leases are not compatible with failover, and, as such,
|
||
|
you need to disallow BOOTP in pools that you are using failover for.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The server currently does very little sanity checking, so if you
|
||
|
configure it wrong, it will just fail in odd ways. I would recommend
|
||
|
therefore that you either do failover or don't do failover, but don't
|
||
|
do any mixed pools. Also, use the same master configuration file for
|
||
|
both servers, and have a separate file that contains the peer
|
||
|
declaration and includes the master file. This will help you to avoid
|
||
|
configuration mismatches. As our implementation evolves, this will
|
||
|
become less of a problem. A basic sample dhcpd.conf file for a
|
||
|
primary server might look like this:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
failover peer "foo" {
|
||
|
primary;
|
||
|
address anthrax.rc.vix.com;
|
||
|
port 647;
|
||
|
peer address trantor.rc.vix.com;
|
||
|
peer port 847;
|
||
|
max-response-delay 60;
|
||
|
max-unacked-updates 10;
|
||
|
mclt 3600;
|
||
|
split 128;
|
||
|
load balance max seconds 3;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
include "/etc/dhcpd.master";
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The statements in the peer declaration are as follows:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I primary
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
.I secondary
|
||
|
statements
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
[ \fBprimary\fR | \fBsecondary\fR ]\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This determines whether the server is primary or secondary, as
|
||
|
described earlier under DHCP FAILOVER.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I address
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B address \fIaddress\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBaddress\fR statement declares the IP address or DNS name on which the
|
||
|
server should listen for connections from its failover peer, and also the
|
||
|
value to use for the DHCP Failover Protocol server identifier. Because this
|
||
|
value is used as an identifier, it may not be omitted.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I peer address
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B peer address \fIaddress\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBpeer address\fR statement declares the IP address or DNS name to
|
||
|
which the server should connect to reach its failover peer for failover
|
||
|
messages.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I port
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B port \fIport-number\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBport\fR statement declares the TCP port on which the server
|
||
|
should listen for connections from its failover peer.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I peer port
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B peer port \fIport-number\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBpeer port\fR statement declares the TCP port to which the
|
||
|
server should connect to reach its failover peer for failover
|
||
|
messages. The port number declared in the \fBpeer port\fR statement
|
||
|
may be the same as the port number declared in the \fBport\fR statement.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I max-response-delay
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B max-response-delay \fIseconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBmax-response-delay\fR statement tells the DHCP server how
|
||
|
many seconds may pass without receiving a message from its failover
|
||
|
peer before it assumes that connection has failed. This number
|
||
|
should be small enough that a transient network failure that breaks
|
||
|
the connection will not result in the servers being out of
|
||
|
communication for a long time, but large enough that the server isn't
|
||
|
constantly making and breaking connections. This parameter must be
|
||
|
specified.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I max-unacked-updates
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B max-unacked-updates \fIcount\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBmax-unacked-updates\fR statement tells the remote DHCP server how
|
||
|
many BNDUPD messages it can send before it receives a BNDACK
|
||
|
from the local system. We don't have enough operational experience
|
||
|
to say what a good value for this is, but 10 seems to work. This
|
||
|
parameter must be specified.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I mclt
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B mclt \fIseconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBmclt\fR statement defines the Maximum Client Lead Time. It
|
||
|
must be specified on the primary, and may not be specified on the
|
||
|
secondary. This is the length of time for which a lease may be
|
||
|
renewed by either failover peer without contacting the other. The
|
||
|
longer you set this, the longer it will take for the running server to
|
||
|
recover IP addresses after moving into PARTNER-DOWN state. The
|
||
|
shorter you set it, the more load your servers will experience when
|
||
|
they are not communicating. A value of something like 3600 is
|
||
|
probably reasonable, but again bear in mind that we have no real
|
||
|
operational experience with this.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I split
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B split \fIindex\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The split statement specifies the split between the primary and
|
||
|
secondary for the purposes of load balancing. Whenever a client
|
||
|
makes a DHCP request, the DHCP server runs a hash on the client
|
||
|
identification, resulting in value from 0 to 255. This is used as
|
||
|
an index into a 256 bit field. If the bit at that index is set,
|
||
|
the primary is responsible. If the bit at that index is not set,
|
||
|
the secondary is responsible. The \fBsplit\fR value determines
|
||
|
how many of the leading bits are set to one. So, in practice, higher
|
||
|
split values will cause the primary to serve more clients than the
|
||
|
secondary. Lower split values, the converse. Legal values are between
|
||
|
0 and 255, of which the most reasonable is 128.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I hba
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B hba \fIcolon-separated-hex-list\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The hba statement specifies the split between the primary and
|
||
|
secondary as a bitmap rather than a cutoff, which theoretically allows
|
||
|
for finer-grained control. In practice, there is probably no need
|
||
|
for such fine-grained control, however. An example hba statement:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
hba ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:
|
||
|
00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00;
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This is equivalent to a \fBsplit 128;\fR statement, and identical. The
|
||
|
following two examples are also equivalent to a \fBsplit\fR of 128, but
|
||
|
are not identical:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
hba aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:
|
||
|
aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa;
|
||
|
|
||
|
hba 55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:
|
||
|
55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55:55;
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
They are equivalent, because half the bits are set to 0, half are set to
|
||
|
1 (0xa and 0x5 are 1010 and 0101 binary respectively) and consequently this
|
||
|
would roughly divide the clients equally between the servers. They are not
|
||
|
identical, because the actual peers this would load balance to each server
|
||
|
are different for each example.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You must only have \fBsplit\fR or \fBhba\fR defined, never both. For most
|
||
|
cases, the fine-grained control that \fBhba\fR offers isn't necessary, and
|
||
|
\fBsplit\fR should be used.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I load balance max seconds
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B load balance max seconds \fIseconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This statement allows you to configure a cutoff after which load
|
||
|
balancing is disabled. The cutoff is based on the number of seconds
|
||
|
since the client sent its first DHCPDISCOVER or DHCPREQUEST message,
|
||
|
and only works with clients that correctly implement the \fIsecs\fR
|
||
|
field - fortunately most clients do. We recommend setting this to
|
||
|
something like 3 or 5. The effect of this is that if one of the
|
||
|
failover peers gets into a state where it is responding to failover
|
||
|
messages but not responding to some client requests, the other
|
||
|
failover peer will take over its client load automatically as the
|
||
|
clients retry.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The Failover pool balance statements.
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBmax-lease-misbalance \fIpercentage\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
\fBmax-lease-ownership \fIpercentage\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
\fBmin-balance \fIseconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
\fBmax-balance \fIseconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This version of the DHCP Server evaluates pool balance on a schedule,
|
||
|
rather than on demand as leases are allocated. The latter approach
|
||
|
proved to be slightly klunky when pool misbalanced reach total
|
||
|
saturation...when any server ran out of leases to assign, it also lost
|
||
|
its ability to notice it had run dry.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In order to understand pool balance, some elements of its operation
|
||
|
first need to be defined. First, there are 'free' and 'backup' leases.
|
||
|
Both of these are referred to as 'free state leases'. 'free' and 'backup'
|
||
|
are 'the free states' for the purpose of this document. The difference
|
||
|
is that only the primary may allocate from 'free' leases unless under
|
||
|
special circumstances, and only the secondary may allocate 'backup' leases.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When pool balance is performed, the only plausible expectation is to
|
||
|
provide a 50/50 split of the free state leases between the two servers.
|
||
|
This is because no one can predict which server will fail, regardless
|
||
|
of the relative load placed upon the two servers, so giving each server
|
||
|
half the leases gives both servers the same amount of 'failure endurance'.
|
||
|
Therefore, there is no way to configure any different behaviour, outside of
|
||
|
some very small windows we will describe shortly.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The first thing calculated on any pool balance run is a value referred to
|
||
|
as 'lts', or "Leases To Send". This, simply, is the difference in the
|
||
|
count of free and backup leases, divided by two. For the secondary,
|
||
|
it is the difference in the backup and free leases, divided by two.
|
||
|
The resulting value is signed: if it is positive, the local server is
|
||
|
expected to hand out leases to retain a 50/50 balance. If it is negative,
|
||
|
the remote server would need to send leases to balance the pool. Once
|
||
|
the lts value reaches zero, the pool is perfectly balanced (give or take
|
||
|
one lease in the case of an odd number of total free state leases).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The current approach is still something of a hybrid of the old approach,
|
||
|
marked by the presence of the \fBmax-lease-misbalance\fR statement. This
|
||
|
parameter configures what used to be a 10% fixed value in previous versions:
|
||
|
if lts is less than free+backup * \fBmax-lease-misbalance\fR percent, then
|
||
|
the server will skip balancing a given pool (it won't bother moving any
|
||
|
leases, even if some leases "should" be moved). The meaning of this value
|
||
|
is also somewhat overloaded, however, in that it also governs the estimation
|
||
|
of when to attempt to balance the pool (which may then also be skipped over).
|
||
|
The oldest leases in the free and backup states are examined. The time
|
||
|
they have resided in their respective queues is used as an estimate to
|
||
|
indicate how much time it is probable it would take before the leases at
|
||
|
the top of the list would be consumed (and thus, how long it would take
|
||
|
to use all leases in that state). This percentage is directly multiplied
|
||
|
by this time, and fit into the schedule if it falls within
|
||
|
the \fBmin-balance\fR and \fBmax-balance\fR configured values. The
|
||
|
scheduled pool check time is only moved in a downwards direction, it is
|
||
|
never increased. Lastly, if the lts is more than double this number in
|
||
|
the negative direction, the local server will 'panic' and transmit a
|
||
|
Failover protocol POOLREQ message, in the hopes that the remote system
|
||
|
will be woken up into action.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Once the lts value exceeds the \fBmax-lease-misbalance\fR percentage of
|
||
|
total free state leases as described above, leases are moved to the remote
|
||
|
server. This is done in two passes.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In the first pass, only leases whose most recent bound client would have
|
||
|
been served by the remote server - according to the Load Balance Algorithm
|
||
|
(see above \fBsplit\fR and \fBhba\fR configuration statements) - are given
|
||
|
away to the peer. This first pass will happily continue to give away leases,
|
||
|
decrementing the lts value by one for each, until the lts value has reached
|
||
|
the negative of the total number of leases multiplied by
|
||
|
the \fBmax-lease-ownership\fR percentage. So it is through this value that
|
||
|
you can permit a small misbalance of the lease pools - for the purpose of
|
||
|
giving the peer more than a 50/50 share of leases in the hopes that their
|
||
|
clients might some day return and be allocated by the peer (operating
|
||
|
normally). This process is referred to as 'MAC Address Affinity', but this
|
||
|
is somewhat misnamed: it applies equally to DHCP Client Identifier options.
|
||
|
Note also that affinity is applied to leases when they enter the state
|
||
|
'free' from 'expired' or 'released'. In this case also, leases will not
|
||
|
be moved from free to backup if the secondary already has more than its
|
||
|
share.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The second pass is only entered into if the first pass fails to reduce
|
||
|
the lts underneath the total number of free state leases multiplied by
|
||
|
the \fBmax-lease-ownership\fR percentage. In this pass, the oldest
|
||
|
leases are given over to the peer without second thought about the Load
|
||
|
Balance Algorithm, and this continues until the lts falls under this
|
||
|
value. In this way, the local server will also happily keep a small
|
||
|
percentage of the leases that would normally load balance to itself.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
So, the \fBmax-lease-misbalance\fR value acts as a behavioural gate.
|
||
|
Smaller values will cause more leases to transition states to balance
|
||
|
the pools over time, higher values will decrease the amount of change
|
||
|
(but may lead to pool starvation if there's a run on leases).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBmax-lease-ownership\fR value permits a small (percenatge) skew
|
||
|
in the lease balance of a percentage of the total number of free state
|
||
|
leases.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Finally, the \fBmin-balance\fR and \fBmax-balance\fR make certain that a
|
||
|
scheduled rebalance event happens within a reasonable timeframe (not
|
||
|
to be thrown off by, for example, a 7 year old free lease).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Plausible values for the percentages lie between 0 and 100, inclusive, but
|
||
|
values over 50 are indistinguishable from one another (once lts exceeds
|
||
|
50% of the free state leases, one server must therefore have 100% of the
|
||
|
leases in its respective free state). It is recommended to select
|
||
|
a \fBmax-lease-ownership\fR value that is lower than the value selected
|
||
|
for the \fBmax-lease-misbalance\fR value. \fBmax-lease-ownership\fR
|
||
|
defaults to 10, and \fBmax-lease-misbalance\fR defaults to 15.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Plausible values for the \fBmin-balance\fR and \fBmax-balance\fR times also
|
||
|
range from 0 to (2^32)-1 (or the limit of your local time_t value), but
|
||
|
default to values 60 and 3600 respectively (to place balance events between
|
||
|
1 minute and 1 hour).
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.SH CLIENT CLASSING
|
||
|
Clients can be separated into classes, and treated differently
|
||
|
depending on what class they are in. This separation can be done
|
||
|
either with a conditional statement, or with a match statement within
|
||
|
the class declaration. It is possible to specify a limit on the
|
||
|
total number of clients within a particular class or subclass that may
|
||
|
hold leases at one time, and it is possible to specify automatic
|
||
|
subclassing based on the contents of the client packet.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
To add clients to classes based on conditional evaluation, you can
|
||
|
specify a matching expression in the class statement:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
class "ras-clients" {
|
||
|
match if substring (option dhcp-client-identifier, 1, 3) = "RAS";
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Note that whether you use matching expressions or add statements (or
|
||
|
both) to classify clients, you must always write a class declaration
|
||
|
for any class that you use. If there will be no match statement and
|
||
|
no in-scope statements for a class, the declaration should look like
|
||
|
this:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
class "ras-clients" {
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.SH SUBCLASSES
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In addition to classes, it is possible to declare subclasses. A
|
||
|
subclass is a class with the same name as a regular class, but with a
|
||
|
specific submatch expression which is hashed for quick matching.
|
||
|
This is essentially a speed hack - the main difference between five
|
||
|
classes with match expressions and one class with five subclasses is
|
||
|
that it will be quicker to find the subclasses. Subclasses work as
|
||
|
follows:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
class "allocation-class-1" {
|
||
|
match pick-first-value (option dhcp-client-identifier, hardware);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
class "allocation-class-2" {
|
||
|
match pick-first-value (option dhcp-client-identifier, hardware);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
subclass "allocation-class-1" 1:8:0:2b:4c:39:ad;
|
||
|
subclass "allocation-class-2" 1:8:0:2b:a9:cc:e3;
|
||
|
subclass "allocation-class-1" 1:0:0:c4:aa:29:44;
|
||
|
|
||
|
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
|
||
|
pool {
|
||
|
allow members of "allocation-class-1";
|
||
|
range 10.0.0.11 10.0.0.50;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
pool {
|
||
|
allow members of "allocation-class-2";
|
||
|
range 10.0.0.51 10.0.0.100;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The data following the class name in the subclass declaration is a
|
||
|
constant value to use in matching the match expression for the class.
|
||
|
When class matching is done, the server will evaluate the match
|
||
|
expression and then look the result up in the hash table. If it
|
||
|
finds a match, the client is considered a member of both the class and
|
||
|
the subclass.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Subclasses can be declared with or without scope. In the above
|
||
|
example, the sole purpose of the subclass is to allow some clients
|
||
|
access to one address pool, while other clients are given access to
|
||
|
the other pool, so these subclasses are declared without scopes. If
|
||
|
part of the purpose of the subclass were to define different parameter
|
||
|
values for some clients, you might want to declare some subclasses
|
||
|
with scopes.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In the above example, if you had a single client that needed some
|
||
|
configuration parameters, while most didn't, you might write the
|
||
|
following subclass declaration for that client:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
subclass "allocation-class-2" 1:08:00:2b:a1:11:31 {
|
||
|
option root-path "samsara:/var/diskless/alphapc";
|
||
|
filename "/tftpboot/netbsd.alphapc-diskless";
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In this example, we've used subclassing as a way to control address
|
||
|
allocation on a per-client basis. However, it's also possible to use
|
||
|
subclassing in ways that are not specific to clients - for example, to
|
||
|
use the value of the vendor-class-identifier option to determine what
|
||
|
values to send in the vendor-encapsulated-options option. An example
|
||
|
of this is shown under the VENDOR ENCAPSULATED OPTIONS head in the
|
||
|
.B dhcp-options(5)
|
||
|
manual page.
|
||
|
.SH PER-CLASS LIMITS ON DYNAMIC ADDRESS ALLOCATION
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You may specify a limit to the number of clients in a class that can
|
||
|
be assigned leases. The effect of this will be to make it difficult
|
||
|
for a new client in a class to get an address. Once a class with
|
||
|
such a limit has reached its limit, the only way a new client in that
|
||
|
class can get a lease is for an existing client to relinquish its
|
||
|
lease, either by letting it expire, or by sending a DHCPRELEASE
|
||
|
packet. Classes with lease limits are specified as follows:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
class "limited-1" {
|
||
|
lease limit 4;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This will produce a class in which a maximum of four members may hold
|
||
|
a lease at one time.
|
||
|
.SH SPAWNING CLASSES
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
It is possible to declare a
|
||
|
.I spawning class\fR.
|
||
|
A spawning class is a class that automatically produces subclasses
|
||
|
based on what the client sends. The reason that spawning classes
|
||
|
were created was to make it possible to create lease-limited classes
|
||
|
on the fly. The envisioned application is a cable-modem environment
|
||
|
where the ISP wishes to provide clients at a particular site with more
|
||
|
than one IP address, but does not wish to provide such clients with
|
||
|
their own subnet, nor give them an unlimited number of IP addresses
|
||
|
from the network segment to which they are connected.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Many cable modem head-end systems can be configured to add a Relay
|
||
|
Agent Information option to DHCP packets when relaying them to the
|
||
|
DHCP server. These systems typically add a circuit ID or remote ID
|
||
|
option that uniquely identifies the customer site. To take advantage
|
||
|
of this, you can write a class declaration as follows:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
class "customer" {
|
||
|
spawn with option agent.circuit-id;
|
||
|
lease limit 4;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Now whenever a request comes in from a customer site, the circuit ID
|
||
|
option will be checked against the class's hash table. If a subclass
|
||
|
is found that matches the circuit ID, the client will be classified in
|
||
|
that subclass and treated accordingly. If no subclass is found
|
||
|
matching the circuit ID, a new one will be created and logged in the
|
||
|
.B dhcpd.leases
|
||
|
file, and the client will be classified in this new class. Once the
|
||
|
client has been classified, it will be treated according to the rules
|
||
|
of the class, including, in this case, being subject to the per-site
|
||
|
limit of four leases.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The use of the subclass spawning mechanism is not restricted to relay
|
||
|
agent options - this particular example is given only because it is a
|
||
|
fairly straightforward one.
|
||
|
.SH COMBINING MATCH, MATCH IF AND SPAWN WITH
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In some cases, it may be useful to use one expression to assign a
|
||
|
client to a particular class, and a second expression to put it into a
|
||
|
subclass of that class. This can be done by combining the \fBmatch
|
||
|
if\fR and \fBspawn with\fR statements, or the \fBmatch if\fR and
|
||
|
\fBmatch\fR statements. For example:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
class "jr-cable-modems" {
|
||
|
match if option dhcp-vendor-identifier = "jrcm";
|
||
|
spawn with option agent.circuit-id;
|
||
|
lease limit 4;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
class "dv-dsl-modems" {
|
||
|
match if opton dhcp-vendor-identifier = "dvdsl";
|
||
|
spawn with option agent.circuit-id;
|
||
|
lease limit 16;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This allows you to have two classes that both have the same \fBspawn
|
||
|
with\fR expression without getting the clients in the two classes
|
||
|
confused with each other.
|
||
|
.SH DYNAMIC DNS UPDATES
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP server has the ability to dynamically update the Domain Name
|
||
|
System. Within the configuration files, you can define how you want
|
||
|
the Domain Name System to be updated. These updates are RFC 2136
|
||
|
compliant so any DNS server supporting RFC 2136 should be able to
|
||
|
accept updates from the DHCP server.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Two DNS update schemes are currently implemented, and another is
|
||
|
planned. The two that are currently available are the ad-hoc DNS
|
||
|
update mode and the interim DHCP-DNS interaction draft update mode.
|
||
|
If and when the DHCP-DNS interaction draft and the DHCID draft make it
|
||
|
through the IETF standards process, there will be a third mode, which
|
||
|
will be the standard DNS update method. The DHCP server must be
|
||
|
configured to use one of the two currently-supported methods, or not
|
||
|
to do dns updates. This can be done with the
|
||
|
.I ddns-update-style
|
||
|
configuration parameter.
|
||
|
.SH THE AD-HOC DNS UPDATE SCHEME
|
||
|
The ad-hoc Dynamic DNS update scheme is
|
||
|
.B now deprecated
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
.B
|
||
|
does not work.
|
||
|
In future releases of the ISC DHCP server, this scheme will not likely be
|
||
|
available. The interim scheme works, allows for failover, and should now be
|
||
|
used. The following description is left here for informational purposes
|
||
|
only.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The ad-hoc Dynamic DNS update scheme implemented in this version of
|
||
|
the ISC DHCP server is a prototype design, which does not
|
||
|
have much to do with the standard update method that is being
|
||
|
standardized in the IETF DHC working group, but rather implements some
|
||
|
very basic, yet useful, update capabilities. This mode
|
||
|
.B does not work
|
||
|
with the
|
||
|
.I failover protocol
|
||
|
because it does not account for the possibility of two different DHCP
|
||
|
servers updating the same set of DNS records.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
For the ad-hoc DNS update method, the client's FQDN is derived in two
|
||
|
parts. First, the hostname is determined. Then, the domain name is
|
||
|
determined, and appended to the hostname.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP server determines the client's hostname by first looking for
|
||
|
a \fIddns-hostname\fR configuration option, and using that if it is
|
||
|
present. If no such option is present, the server looks for a
|
||
|
valid hostname in the FQDN option sent by the client. If one is
|
||
|
found, it is used; otherwise, if the client sent a host-name option,
|
||
|
that is used. Otherwise, if there is a host declaration that applies
|
||
|
to the client, the name from that declaration will be used. If none
|
||
|
of these applies, the server will not have a hostname for the client,
|
||
|
and will not be able to do a DNS update.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The domain name is determined from the
|
||
|
.I ddns-domainname
|
||
|
configuration option. The default configuration for this option is:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
.sp 1
|
||
|
option server.ddns-domainname = config-option domain-name;
|
||
|
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
So if this configuration option is not configured to a different
|
||
|
value (over-riding the above default), or if a domain-name option
|
||
|
has not been configured for the client's scope, then the server will
|
||
|
not attempt to perform a DNS update.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The client's fully-qualified domain name, derived as we have
|
||
|
described, is used as the name on which an "A" record will be stored.
|
||
|
The A record will contain the IP address that the client was assigned
|
||
|
in its lease. If there is already an A record with the same name in
|
||
|
the DNS server, no update of either the A or PTR records will occur -
|
||
|
this prevents a client from claiming that its hostname is the name of
|
||
|
some network server. For example, if you have a fileserver called
|
||
|
"fs.sneedville.edu", and the client claims its hostname is "fs", no
|
||
|
DNS update will be done for that client, and an error message will be
|
||
|
logged.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the A record update succeeds, a PTR record update for the assigned
|
||
|
IP address will be done, pointing to the A record. This update is
|
||
|
unconditional - it will be done even if another PTR record of the same
|
||
|
name exists. Since the IP address has been assigned to the DHCP
|
||
|
server, this should be safe.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Please note that the current implementation assumes clients only have
|
||
|
a single network interface. A client with two network interfaces
|
||
|
will see unpredictable behavior. This is considered a bug, and will
|
||
|
be fixed in a later release. It may be helpful to enable the
|
||
|
.I one-lease-per-client
|
||
|
parameter so that roaming clients do not trigger this same behavior.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP protocol normally involves a four-packet exchange - first the
|
||
|
client sends a DHCPDISCOVER message, then the server sends a
|
||
|
DHCPOFFER, then the client sends a DHCPREQUEST, then the server sends
|
||
|
a DHCPACK. In the current version of the server, the server will do
|
||
|
a DNS update after it has received the DHCPREQUEST, and before it has
|
||
|
sent the DHCPACK. It only sends the DNS update if it has not sent
|
||
|
one for the client's address before, in order to minimize the impact
|
||
|
on the DHCP server.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When the client's lease expires, the DHCP server (if it is operating
|
||
|
at the time, or when next it operates) will remove the client's A and
|
||
|
PTR records from the DNS database. If the client releases its lease
|
||
|
by sending a DHCPRELEASE message, the server will likewise remove the
|
||
|
A and PTR records.
|
||
|
.SH THE INTERIM DNS UPDATE SCHEME
|
||
|
The interim DNS update scheme operates mostly according to several
|
||
|
drafts that are being considered by the IETF and are expected to
|
||
|
become standards, but are not yet standards, and may not be
|
||
|
standardized exactly as currently proposed. These are:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
.ce 3
|
||
|
draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-??.txt
|
||
|
draft-ietf-dhc-fqdn-option-??.txt
|
||
|
draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-??.txt
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Because our implementation is slightly different than the standard, we
|
||
|
will briefly document the operation of this update style here.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The first point to understand about this style of DNS update is that
|
||
|
unlike the ad-hoc style, the DHCP server does not necessarily
|
||
|
always update both the A and the PTR records. The FQDN option
|
||
|
includes a flag which, when sent by the client, indicates that the
|
||
|
client wishes to update its own A record. In that case, the server
|
||
|
can be configured either to honor the client's intentions or ignore
|
||
|
them. This is done with the statement \fIallow client-updates;\fR or
|
||
|
the statement \fIignore client-updates;\fR. By default, client
|
||
|
updates are allowed.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the server is configured to allow client updates, then if the
|
||
|
client sends a fully-qualified domain name in the FQDN option, the
|
||
|
server will use that name the client sent in the FQDN option to update
|
||
|
the PTR record. For example, let us say that the client is a visitor
|
||
|
from the "radish.org" domain, whose hostname is "jschmoe". The
|
||
|
server is for the "example.org" domain. The DHCP client indicates in
|
||
|
the FQDN option that its FQDN is "jschmoe.radish.org.". It also
|
||
|
indicates that it wants to update its own A record. The DHCP server
|
||
|
therefore does not attempt to set up an A record for the client, but
|
||
|
does set up a PTR record for the IP address that it assigns the
|
||
|
client, pointing at jschmoe.radish.org. Once the DHCP client has an
|
||
|
IP address, it can update its own A record, assuming that the
|
||
|
"radish.org" DNS server will allow it to do so.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the server is configured not to allow client updates, or if the
|
||
|
client doesn't want to do its own update, the server will simply
|
||
|
choose a name for the client from either the fqdn option (if present)
|
||
|
or the hostname option (if present). It will use its own
|
||
|
domain name for the client, just as in the ad-hoc update scheme.
|
||
|
It will then update both the A and PTR record, using the name that it
|
||
|
chose for the client. If the client sends a fully-qualified domain
|
||
|
name in the fqdn option, the server uses only the leftmost part of the
|
||
|
domain name - in the example above, "jschmoe" instead of
|
||
|
"jschmoe.radish.org".
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Further, if the \fIignore client-updates;\fR directive is used, then
|
||
|
the server will in addition send a response in the DHCP packet, using
|
||
|
the FQDN Option, that implies to the client that it should perform its
|
||
|
own updates if it chooses to do so. With \fIdeny client-updates;\fR, a
|
||
|
response is sent which indicates the client may not perform updates.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Also, if the
|
||
|
.I use-host-decl-names
|
||
|
configuration option is enabled, then the host declaration's
|
||
|
.I hostname
|
||
|
will be used in place of the
|
||
|
.I hostname
|
||
|
option, and the same rules will apply as described above.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The other difference between the ad-hoc scheme and the interim
|
||
|
scheme is that with the interim scheme, a method is used that
|
||
|
allows more than one DHCP server to update the DNS database without
|
||
|
accidentally deleting A records that shouldn't be deleted nor failing
|
||
|
to add A records that should be added. The scheme works as follows:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When the DHCP server issues a client a new lease, it creates a text
|
||
|
string that is an MD5 hash over the DHCP client's identification (see
|
||
|
draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-??.txt for details). The update adds an A
|
||
|
record with the name the server chose and a TXT record containing the
|
||
|
hashed identifier string (hashid). If this update succeeds, the
|
||
|
server is done.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the update fails because the A record already exists, then the DHCP
|
||
|
server attempts to add the A record with the prerequisite that there
|
||
|
must be a TXT record in the same name as the new A record, and that
|
||
|
TXT record's contents must be equal to hashid. If this update
|
||
|
succeeds, then the client has its A record and PTR record. If it
|
||
|
fails, then the name the client has been assigned (or requested) is in
|
||
|
use, and can't be used by the client. At this point the DHCP server
|
||
|
gives up trying to do a DNS update for the client until the client
|
||
|
chooses a new name.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The interim DNS update scheme is called interim for two reasons.
|
||
|
First, it does not quite follow the drafts. The current versions of
|
||
|
the drafts call for a new DHCID RRtype, but this is not yet
|
||
|
available. The interim DNS update scheme uses a TXT record
|
||
|
instead. Also, the existing ddns-resolution draft calls for the DHCP
|
||
|
server to put a DHCID RR on the PTR record, but the \fIinterim\fR
|
||
|
update method does not do this. It is our position that this is not
|
||
|
useful, and we are working with the author in hopes of removing it
|
||
|
from the next version of the draft, or better understanding why it is
|
||
|
considered useful.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In addition to these differences, the server also does not update very
|
||
|
aggressively. Because each DNS update involves a round trip to the
|
||
|
DNS server, there is a cost associated with doing updates even if they
|
||
|
do not actually modify the DNS database. So the DHCP server tracks
|
||
|
whether or not it has updated the record in the past (this information
|
||
|
is stored on the lease) and does not attempt to update records that it
|
||
|
thinks it has already updated.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This can lead to cases where the DHCP server adds a record, and then
|
||
|
the record is deleted through some other mechanism, but the server
|
||
|
never again updates the DNS because it thinks the data is already
|
||
|
there. In this case the data can be removed from the lease through
|
||
|
operator intervention, and once this has been done, the DNS will be
|
||
|
updated the next time the client renews.
|
||
|
.SH DYNAMIC DNS UPDATE SECURITY
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When you set your DNS server up to allow updates from the DHCP server,
|
||
|
you may be exposing it to unauthorized updates. To avoid this, you
|
||
|
should use TSIG signatures - a method of cryptographically signing
|
||
|
updates using a shared secret key. As long as you protect the
|
||
|
secrecy of this key, your updates should also be secure. Note,
|
||
|
however, that the DHCP protocol itself provides no security, and that
|
||
|
clients can therefore provide information to the DHCP server which the
|
||
|
DHCP server will then use in its updates, with the constraints
|
||
|
described previously.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DNS server must be configured to allow updates for any zone that
|
||
|
the DHCP server will be updating. For example, let us say that
|
||
|
clients in the sneedville.edu domain will be assigned addresses on the
|
||
|
10.10.17.0/24 subnet. In that case, you will need a key declaration
|
||
|
for the TSIG key you will be using, and also two zone declarations -
|
||
|
one for the zone containing A records that will be updates and one for
|
||
|
the zone containing PTR records - for ISC BIND, something like this:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
key DHCP_UPDATER {
|
||
|
algorithm hmac-md5;
|
||
|
secret pRP5FapFoJ95JEL06sv4PQ==;
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
zone "example.org" {
|
||
|
type master;
|
||
|
file "example.org.db";
|
||
|
allow-update { key DHCP_UPDATER; };
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
zone "17.10.10.in-addr.arpa" {
|
||
|
type master;
|
||
|
file "10.10.17.db";
|
||
|
allow-update { key DHCP_UPDATER; };
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You will also have to configure your DHCP server to do updates to
|
||
|
these zones. To do so, you need to add something like this to your
|
||
|
dhcpd.conf file:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
key DHCP_UPDATER {
|
||
|
algorithm hmac-md5;
|
||
|
secret pRP5FapFoJ95JEL06sv4PQ==;
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
zone EXAMPLE.ORG. {
|
||
|
primary 127.0.0.1;
|
||
|
key DHCP_UPDATER;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
zone 17.127.10.in-addr.arpa. {
|
||
|
primary 127.0.0.1;
|
||
|
key DHCP_UPDATER;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIprimary\fR statement specifies the IP address of the name
|
||
|
server whose zone information is to be updated.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Note that the zone declarations have to correspond to authority
|
||
|
records in your name server - in the above example, there must be an
|
||
|
SOA record for "example.org." and for "17.10.10.in-addr.arpa.". For
|
||
|
example, if there were a subdomain "foo.example.org" with no separate
|
||
|
SOA, you could not write a zone declaration for "foo.example.org."
|
||
|
Also keep in mind that zone names in your DHCP configuration should end in a
|
||
|
"."; this is the preferred syntax. If you do not end your zone name in a
|
||
|
".", the DHCP server will figure it out. Also note that in the DHCP
|
||
|
configuration, zone names are not encapsulated in quotes where there are in
|
||
|
the DNS configuration.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You should choose your own secret key, of course. The ISC BIND 8 and
|
||
|
9 distributions come with a program for generating secret keys called
|
||
|
dnssec-keygen. The version that comes with BIND 9 is likely to produce a
|
||
|
substantially more random key, so we recommend you use that one even
|
||
|
if you are not using BIND 9 as your DNS server. If you are using BIND 9's
|
||
|
dnssec-keygen, the above key would be created as follows:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
dnssec-keygen -a HMAC-MD5 -b 128 -n USER DHCP_UPDATER
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If you are using the BIND 8 dnskeygen program, the following command will
|
||
|
generate a key as seen above:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
dnskeygen -H 128 -u -c -n DHCP_UPDATER
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You may wish to enable logging of DNS updates on your DNS server.
|
||
|
To do so, you might write a logging statement like the following:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
logging {
|
||
|
channel update_debug {
|
||
|
file "/var/log/update-debug.log";
|
||
|
severity debug 3;
|
||
|
print-category yes;
|
||
|
print-severity yes;
|
||
|
print-time yes;
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
channel security_info {
|
||
|
file "/var/log/named-auth.info";
|
||
|
severity info;
|
||
|
print-category yes;
|
||
|
print-severity yes;
|
||
|
print-time yes;
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
category update { update_debug; };
|
||
|
category security { security_info; };
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
You must create the /var/log/named-auth.info and
|
||
|
/var/log/update-debug.log files before starting the name server. For
|
||
|
more information on configuring ISC BIND, consult the documentation
|
||
|
that accompanies it.
|
||
|
.SH REFERENCE: EVENTS
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
There are three kinds of events that can happen regarding a lease, and
|
||
|
it is possible to declare statements that occur when any of these
|
||
|
events happen. These events are the commit event, when the server
|
||
|
has made a commitment of a certain lease to a client, the release
|
||
|
event, when the client has released the server from its commitment,
|
||
|
and the expiry event, when the commitment expires.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
To declare a set of statements to execute when an event happens, you
|
||
|
must use the \fBon\fR statement, followed by the name of the event,
|
||
|
followed by a series of statements to execute when the event happens,
|
||
|
enclosed in braces. Events are used to implement DNS
|
||
|
updates, so you should not define your own event handlers if you are
|
||
|
using the built-in DNS update mechanism.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The built-in version of the DNS update mechanism is in a text
|
||
|
string towards the top of server/dhcpd.c. If you want to use events
|
||
|
for things other than DNS updates, and you also want DNS updates, you
|
||
|
will have to start out by copying this code into your dhcpd.conf file
|
||
|
and modifying it.
|
||
|
.SH REFERENCE: DECLARATIONS
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I include
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
\fBinclude\fR \fI"filename"\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIinclude\fR statement is used to read in a named file, and process
|
||
|
the contents of that file as though it were entered in place of the
|
||
|
include statement.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I shared-network
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
\fBshared-network\fR \fIname\fR \fB{\fR
|
||
|
[ \fIparameters\fR ]
|
||
|
[ \fIdeclarations\fR ]
|
||
|
\fB}\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIshared-network\fR statement is used to inform the DHCP server
|
||
|
that some IP subnets actually share the same physical network. Any
|
||
|
subnets in a shared network should be declared within a
|
||
|
\fIshared-network\fR statement. Parameters specified in the
|
||
|
\fIshared-network\fR statement will be used when booting clients on
|
||
|
those subnets unless parameters provided at the subnet or host level
|
||
|
override them. If any subnet in a shared network has addresses
|
||
|
available for dynamic allocation, those addresses are collected into a
|
||
|
common pool for that shared network and assigned to clients as needed.
|
||
|
There is no way to distinguish on which subnet of a shared network a
|
||
|
client should boot.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Name
|
||
|
should be the name of the shared network. This name is used when
|
||
|
printing debugging messages, so it should be descriptive for the
|
||
|
shared network. The name may have the syntax of a valid domain name
|
||
|
(although it will never be used as such), or it may be any arbitrary
|
||
|
name, enclosed in quotes.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I subnet
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
\fBsubnet\fR \fIsubnet-number\fR \fBnetmask\fR \fInetmask\fR \fB{\fR
|
||
|
[ \fIparameters\fR ]
|
||
|
[ \fIdeclarations\fR ]
|
||
|
\fB}\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIsubnet\fR statement is used to provide dhcpd with enough
|
||
|
information to tell whether or not an IP address is on that subnet.
|
||
|
It may also be used to provide subnet-specific parameters and to
|
||
|
specify what addresses may be dynamically allocated to clients booting
|
||
|
on that subnet. Such addresses are specified using the \fIrange\fR
|
||
|
declaration.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I subnet-number
|
||
|
should be an IP address or domain name which resolves to the subnet
|
||
|
number of the subnet being described. The
|
||
|
.I netmask
|
||
|
should be an IP address or domain name which resolves to the subnet mask
|
||
|
of the subnet being described. The subnet number, together with the
|
||
|
netmask, are sufficient to determine whether any given IP address is
|
||
|
on the specified subnet.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Although a netmask must be given with every subnet declaration, it is
|
||
|
recommended that if there is any variance in subnet masks at a site, a
|
||
|
subnet-mask option statement be used in each subnet declaration to set
|
||
|
the desired subnet mask, since any subnet-mask option statement will
|
||
|
override the subnet mask declared in the subnet statement.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I range
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
.B range\fR [ \fBdynamic-bootp\fR ] \fIlow-address\fR [ \fIhigh-address\fR]\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
For any subnet on which addresses will be assigned dynamically, there
|
||
|
must be at least one \fIrange\fR statement. The range statement
|
||
|
gives the lowest and highest IP addresses in a range. All IP
|
||
|
addresses in the range should be in the subnet in which the
|
||
|
\fIrange\fR statement is declared. The \fIdynamic-bootp\fR flag may
|
||
|
be specified if addresses in the specified range may be dynamically
|
||
|
assigned to BOOTP clients as well as DHCP clients. When specifying a
|
||
|
single address, \fIhigh-address\fR can be omitted.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I host
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
\fBhost\fR \fIhostname\fR {
|
||
|
[ \fIparameters\fR ]
|
||
|
[ \fIdeclarations\fR ]
|
||
|
\fB}\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.B host
|
||
|
declaration provides a scope in which to provide configuration information about
|
||
|
a specific client, and also provides a way to assign a client a fixed address.
|
||
|
The host declaration provides a way for the DHCP server to identify a DHCP or
|
||
|
BOOTP client, and also a way to assign the client a static IP address.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If it is desirable to be able to boot a DHCP or BOOTP client on more than one
|
||
|
subnet with fixed addresses, more than one address may be specified in the
|
||
|
.I fixed-address
|
||
|
declaration, or more than one
|
||
|
.B host
|
||
|
statement may be specified matching the same client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If client-specific boot parameters must change based on the network
|
||
|
to which the client is attached, then multiple
|
||
|
.B host
|
||
|
declarations should be used. The
|
||
|
.B host
|
||
|
declarations will only match a client if one of their
|
||
|
.I fixed-address
|
||
|
statements is viable on the subnet (or shared network) where the client is
|
||
|
attached. Conversely, for a
|
||
|
.B host
|
||
|
declaration to match a client being allocated a dynamic address, it must not
|
||
|
have any
|
||
|
.I fixed-address
|
||
|
statements. You may therefore need a mixture of
|
||
|
.B host
|
||
|
declarations for any given client...some having
|
||
|
.I fixed-address
|
||
|
statements, others without.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I hostname
|
||
|
should be a name identifying the host. If a \fIhostname\fR option is
|
||
|
not specified for the host, \fIhostname\fR is used.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fIHost\fR declarations are matched to actual DHCP or BOOTP clients
|
||
|
by matching the \fRdhcp-client-identifier\fR option specified in the
|
||
|
\fIhost\fR declaration to the one supplied by the client, or, if the
|
||
|
\fIhost\fR declaration or the client does not provide a
|
||
|
\fRdhcp-client-identifier\fR option, by matching the \fIhardware\fR
|
||
|
parameter in the \fIhost\fR declaration to the network hardware
|
||
|
address supplied by the client. BOOTP clients do not normally
|
||
|
provide a \fIdhcp-client-identifier\fR, so the hardware address must
|
||
|
be used for all clients that may boot using the BOOTP protocol.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Please be aware that
|
||
|
.B only
|
||
|
the \fIdhcp-client-identifier\fR option and the hardware address can be
|
||
|
used to match a host declaration. For example, it is not possible to match
|
||
|
a host declaration to a \fIhost-name\fR option. This is because the
|
||
|
host-name option cannot be guaranteed to be unique for any given client,
|
||
|
whereas both the hardware address and \fIdhcp-client-identifier\fR option
|
||
|
are at least theoretically guaranteed to be unique to a given client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I group
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
\fBgroup\fR {
|
||
|
[ \fIparameters\fR ]
|
||
|
[ \fIdeclarations\fR ]
|
||
|
\fB}\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The group statement is used simply to apply one or more parameters to
|
||
|
a group of declarations. It can be used to group hosts, shared
|
||
|
networks, subnets, or even other groups.
|
||
|
.SH REFERENCE: ALLOW AND DENY
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I allow
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
.I deny
|
||
|
statements can be used to control the response of the DHCP server to
|
||
|
various sorts of requests. The allow and deny keywords actually have
|
||
|
different meanings depending on the context. In a pool context, these
|
||
|
keywords can be used to set up access lists for address allocation
|
||
|
pools. In other contexts, the keywords simply control general server
|
||
|
behavior with respect to clients based on scope. In a non-pool
|
||
|
context, the
|
||
|
.I ignore
|
||
|
keyword can be used in place of the
|
||
|
.I deny
|
||
|
keyword to prevent logging of denied requests.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.SH ALLOW DENY AND IGNORE IN SCOPE
|
||
|
The following usages of allow and deny will work in any scope,
|
||
|
although it is not recommended that they be used in pool
|
||
|
declarations.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I unknown-clients
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow unknown-clients;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny unknown-clients;\fR
|
||
|
\fBignore unknown-clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBunknown-clients\fR flag is used to tell dhcpd whether
|
||
|
or not to dynamically assign addresses to unknown clients. Dynamic
|
||
|
address assignment to unknown clients is \fBallow\fRed by default.
|
||
|
An unknown client is simply a client that has no host declaration.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The use of this option is now \fIdeprecated\fR. If you are trying to
|
||
|
restrict access on your network to known clients, you should use \fBdeny
|
||
|
unknown-clients;\fR inside of your address pool, as described under the
|
||
|
heading ALLOW AND DENY WITHIN POOL DECLARAIONS.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I bootp
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow bootp;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny bootp;\fR
|
||
|
\fBignore bootp;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBbootp\fR flag is used to tell dhcpd whether
|
||
|
or not to respond to bootp queries. Bootp queries are \fBallow\fRed
|
||
|
by default.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This option does not satisfy the requirement of failover peers for denying
|
||
|
dynamic bootp clients. The \fBdeny dynamic bootp clients;\fR option should
|
||
|
be used instead. See the ALLOW AND DENY WITHIN POOL DECLARATIONS section
|
||
|
of this man page for more details.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I booting
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow booting;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny booting;\fR
|
||
|
\fBignore booting;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBbooting\fR flag is used to tell dhcpd whether or not to respond
|
||
|
to queries from a particular client. This keyword only has meaning
|
||
|
when it appears in a host declaration. By default, booting is
|
||
|
\fBallow\fRed, but if it is disabled for a particular client, then
|
||
|
that client will not be able to get an address from the DHCP server.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I duplicates
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow duplicates;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny duplicates;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Host declarations can match client messages based on the DHCP Client
|
||
|
Identifier option or based on the client's network hardware type and
|
||
|
MAC address. If the MAC address is used, the host declaration will
|
||
|
match any client with that MAC address - even clients with different
|
||
|
client identifiers. This doesn't normally happen, but is possible
|
||
|
when one computer has more than one operating system installed on it -
|
||
|
for example, Microsoft Windows and NetBSD or Linux.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBduplicates\fR flag tells the DHCP server that if a request is
|
||
|
received from a client that matches the MAC address of a host
|
||
|
declaration, any other leases matching that MAC address should be
|
||
|
discarded by the server, even if the UID is not the same. This is a
|
||
|
violation of the DHCP protocol, but can prevent clients whose client
|
||
|
identifiers change regularly from holding many leases at the same time.
|
||
|
By default, duplicates are \fBallow\fRed.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I declines
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow declines;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny declines;\fR
|
||
|
\fBignore declines;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCPDECLINE message is used by DHCP clients to indicate that the
|
||
|
lease the server has offered is not valid. When the server receives
|
||
|
a DHCPDECLINE for a particular address, it normally abandons that
|
||
|
address, assuming that some unauthorized system is using it.
|
||
|
Unfortunately, a malicious or buggy client can, using DHCPDECLINE
|
||
|
messages, completely exhaust the DHCP server's allocation pool. The
|
||
|
server will reclaim these leases, but while the client is running
|
||
|
through the pool, it may cause serious thrashing in the DNS, and it
|
||
|
will also cause the DHCP server to forget old DHCP client address
|
||
|
allocations.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBdeclines\fR flag tells the DHCP server whether or not to honor
|
||
|
DHCPDECLINE messages. If it is set to \fBdeny\fR or \fBignore\fR in
|
||
|
a particular scope, the DHCP server will not respond to DHCPDECLINE
|
||
|
messages.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I client-updates
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow client-updates;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny client-updates;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBclient-updates\fR flag tells the DHCP server whether or not to
|
||
|
honor the client's intention to do its own update of its A record.
|
||
|
This is only relevant when doing \fIinterim\fR DNS updates. See the
|
||
|
documentation under the heading THE INTERIM DNS UPDATE SCHEME for
|
||
|
details.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I leasequery
|
||
|
.B keyword
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBallow leasequery;\fR
|
||
|
\fBdeny leasequery;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fBleasequery\fR flag tells the DHCP server whether or not to
|
||
|
answer DHCPLEASEQUERY packets. The answer to a DHCPLEASEQUERY packet
|
||
|
includes information about a specific lease, such as when it was
|
||
|
issued and when it will expire. By default, the server will not
|
||
|
respond to these packets.
|
||
|
.SH ALLOW AND DENY WITHIN POOL DECLARATIONS
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The uses of the allow and deny keywords shown in the previous section
|
||
|
work pretty much the same way whether the client is sending a
|
||
|
DHCPDISCOVER or a DHCPREQUEST message - an address will be allocated
|
||
|
to the client (either the old address it's requesting, or a new
|
||
|
address) and then that address will be tested to see if it's okay to
|
||
|
let the client have it. If the client requested it, and it's not
|
||
|
okay, the server will send a DHCPNAK message. Otherwise, the server
|
||
|
will simply not respond to the client. If it is okay to give the
|
||
|
address to the client, the server will send a DHCPACK message.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The primary motivation behind pool declarations is to have address
|
||
|
allocation pools whose allocation policies are different. A client
|
||
|
may be denied access to one pool, but allowed access to another pool
|
||
|
on the same network segment. In order for this to work, access
|
||
|
control has to be done during address allocation, not after address
|
||
|
allocation is done.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When a DHCPREQUEST message is processed, address allocation simply
|
||
|
consists of looking up the address the client is requesting and seeing
|
||
|
if it's still available for the client. If it is, then the DHCP
|
||
|
server checks both the address pool permit lists and the relevant
|
||
|
in-scope allow and deny statements to see if it's okay to give the
|
||
|
lease to the client. In the case of a DHCPDISCOVER message, the
|
||
|
allocation process is done as described previously in the ADDRESS
|
||
|
ALLOCATION section.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When declaring permit lists for address allocation pools, the
|
||
|
following syntaxes are recognized following the allow or deny keywords:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBknown-clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to any client that has a host declaration (i.e., is known).
|
||
|
A client is known if it has a host declaration in \fIany\fR scope, not
|
||
|
just the current scope.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBunknown-clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to any client that has no host declaration (i.e., is not
|
||
|
known).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBmembers of "\fRclass\fB";\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to any client that is a member of the named class.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBdynamic bootp clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to any bootp client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBauthenticated clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to any client that has been authenticated using the DHCP
|
||
|
authentication protocol. This is not yet supported.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBunauthenticated clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to any client that has not been authenticated using the DHCP
|
||
|
authentication protocol. This is not yet supported.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBall clients;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If specified, this statement either allows or prevents allocation from
|
||
|
this pool to all clients. This can be used when you want to write a
|
||
|
pool declaration for some reason, but hold it in reserve, or when you
|
||
|
want to renumber your network quickly, and thus want the server to
|
||
|
force all clients that have been allocated addresses from this pool to
|
||
|
obtain new addresses immediately when they next renew.
|
||
|
.SH REFERENCE: PARAMETERS
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I adaptive-lease-time-threshold
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B adaptive-lease-time-threshold \fIpercentage\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When the number of allocated leases within a pool rises above
|
||
|
the \fIpercentage\fR given in this statement, the DHCP server decreases
|
||
|
the lease length for new clients within this pool to \fImin-lease-time\fR
|
||
|
seconds. Clients renewing an already valid (long) leases get at least the
|
||
|
remaining time from the current lease. Since the leases expire faster,
|
||
|
the server may either recover more quickly or avoid pool exhaustion
|
||
|
entirely. Once the number of allocated leases drop below the threshold,
|
||
|
the server reverts back to normal lease times. Valid percentages are
|
||
|
between 1 and 99.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I always-broadcast
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B always-broadcast \fIflag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP and BOOTP protocols both require DHCP and BOOTP clients to
|
||
|
set the broadcast bit in the flags field of the BOOTP message header.
|
||
|
Unfortunately, some DHCP and BOOTP clients do not do this, and
|
||
|
therefore may not receive responses from the DHCP server. The DHCP
|
||
|
server can be made to always broadcast its responses to clients by
|
||
|
setting this flag to 'on' for the relevant scope; relevant scopes would be
|
||
|
inside a conditional statement, as a parameter for a class, or as a parameter
|
||
|
for a host declaration. To avoid creating excess broadcast traffic on your
|
||
|
network, we recommend that you restrict the use of this option to as few
|
||
|
clients as possible. For example, the Microsoft DHCP client is known not
|
||
|
to have this problem, as are the OpenTransport and ISC DHCP clients.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I always-reply-rfc1048
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B always-reply-rfc1048 \fIflag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Some BOOTP clients expect RFC1048-style responses, but do not follow
|
||
|
RFC1048 when sending their requests. You can tell that a client is
|
||
|
having this problem if it is not getting the options you have
|
||
|
configured for it and if you see in the server log the message
|
||
|
"(non-rfc1048)" printed with each BOOTREQUEST that is logged.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If you want to send rfc1048 options to such a client, you can set the
|
||
|
.B always-reply-rfc1048
|
||
|
option in that client's host declaration, and the DHCP server will
|
||
|
respond with an RFC-1048-style vendor options field. This flag can
|
||
|
be set in any scope, and will affect all clients covered by that
|
||
|
scope.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I authoritative
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B authoritative;
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B not authoritative;
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The DHCP server will normally assume that the configuration
|
||
|
information about a given network segment is not known to be correct
|
||
|
and is not authoritative. This is so that if a naive user installs a
|
||
|
DHCP server not fully understanding how to configure it, it does not
|
||
|
send spurious DHCPNAK messages to clients that have obtained addresses
|
||
|
from a legitimate DHCP server on the network.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Network administrators setting up authoritative DHCP servers for their
|
||
|
networks should always write \fBauthoritative;\fR at the top of their
|
||
|
configuration file to indicate that the DHCP server \fIshould\fR send
|
||
|
DHCPNAK messages to misconfigured clients. If this is not done,
|
||
|
clients will be unable to get a correct IP address after changing
|
||
|
subnets until their old lease has expired, which could take quite a
|
||
|
long time.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Usually, writing \fBauthoritative;\fR at the top level of the file
|
||
|
should be sufficient. However, if a DHCP server is to be set up so
|
||
|
that it is aware of some networks for which it is authoritative and
|
||
|
some networks for which it is not, it may be more appropriate to
|
||
|
declare authority on a per-network-segment basis.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Note that the most specific scope for which the concept of authority
|
||
|
makes any sense is the physical network segment - either a
|
||
|
shared-network statement or a subnet statement that is not contained
|
||
|
within a shared-network statement. It is not meaningful to specify
|
||
|
that the server is authoritative for some subnets within a shared
|
||
|
network, but not authoritative for others, nor is it meaningful to
|
||
|
specify that the server is authoritative for some host declarations
|
||
|
and not others.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIboot-unknown-clients\fR statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B boot-unknown-clients \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the \fIboot-unknown-clients\fR statement is present and has a value
|
||
|
of \fIfalse\fR or \fIoff\fR, then clients for which there is no
|
||
|
.I host
|
||
|
declaration will not be allowed to obtain IP addresses. If this
|
||
|
statement is not present or has a value of \fItrue\fR or \fIon\fR,
|
||
|
then clients without host declarations will be allowed to obtain IP
|
||
|
addresses, as long as those addresses are not restricted by
|
||
|
.I allow
|
||
|
and \fIdeny\fR statements within their \fIpool\fR declarations.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIddns-hostname\fR statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B ddns-hostname \fIname\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIname\fR parameter should be the hostname that will be used in
|
||
|
setting up the client's A and PTR records. If no ddns-hostname is
|
||
|
specified in scope, then the server will derive the hostname
|
||
|
automatically, using an algorithm that varies for each of the
|
||
|
different update methods.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIddns-domainname\fR statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B ddns-domainname \fIname\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIname\fR parameter should be the domain name that will be
|
||
|
appended to the client's hostname to form a fully-qualified
|
||
|
domain-name (FQDN).
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIddns-rev-domainname\fR statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B ddns-rev-domainname \fIname\fB;\fR
|
||
|
The \fIname\fR parameter should be the domain name that will be
|
||
|
appended to the client's reversed IP address to produce a name for use
|
||
|
in the client's PTR record. By default, this is "in-addr.arpa.", but
|
||
|
the default can be overridden here.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The reversed IP address to which this domain name is appended is
|
||
|
always the IP address of the client, in dotted quad notation, reversed
|
||
|
- for example, if the IP address assigned to the client is
|
||
|
10.17.92.74, then the reversed IP address is 74.92.17.10. So a
|
||
|
client with that IP address would, by default, be given a PTR record
|
||
|
of 10.17.92.74.in-addr.arpa.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIddns-update-style\fR parameter
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B ddns-update-style \fIstyle\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I style
|
||
|
parameter must be one of \fBad-hoc\fR, \fBinterim\fR or \fBnone\fR.
|
||
|
The \fIddns-update-style\fR statement is only meaningful in the outer
|
||
|
scope - it is evaluated once after reading the dhcpd.conf file, rather
|
||
|
than each time a client is assigned an IP address, so there is no way
|
||
|
to use different DNS update styles for different clients.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B The
|
||
|
.I ddns-updates
|
||
|
.B statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
\fBddns-updates \fIflag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIddns-updates\fR parameter controls whether or not the server will
|
||
|
attempt to do a DNS update when a lease is confirmed. Set this to \fIoff\fR
|
||
|
if the server should not attempt to do updates within a certain scope.
|
||
|
The \fIddns-updates\fR parameter is on by default. To disable DNS
|
||
|
updates in all scopes, it is preferable to use the
|
||
|
\fIddns-update-style\fR statement, setting the style to \fInone\fR.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I default-lease-time
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B default-lease-time \fItime\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Time
|
||
|
should be the length in seconds that will be assigned to a lease if
|
||
|
the client requesting the lease does not ask for a specific expiration
|
||
|
time.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I do-forward-updates
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B do-forward-updates \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIdo-forward-updates\fR statement instructs the DHCP server as
|
||
|
to whether it should attempt to update a DHCP client's A record
|
||
|
when the client acquires or renews a lease. This statement has no
|
||
|
effect unless DNS updates are enabled and \fBddns-update-style\fR is
|
||
|
set to \fBinterim\fR. Forward updates are enabled by default. If
|
||
|
this statement is used to disable forward updates, the DHCP server
|
||
|
will never attempt to update the client's A record, and will only ever
|
||
|
attempt to update the client's PTR record if the client supplies an
|
||
|
FQDN that should be placed in the PTR record using the fqdn option.
|
||
|
If forward updates are enabled, the DHCP server will still honor the
|
||
|
setting of the \fBclient-updates\fR flag.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I dynamic-bootp-lease-cutoff
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B dynamic-bootp-lease-cutoff \fIdate\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIdynamic-bootp-lease-cutoff\fR statement sets the ending time
|
||
|
for all leases assigned dynamically to BOOTP clients. Because BOOTP
|
||
|
clients do not have any way of renewing leases, and don't know that
|
||
|
their leases could expire, by default dhcpd assigns infinite leases
|
||
|
to all BOOTP clients. However, it may make sense in some situations
|
||
|
to set a cutoff date for all BOOTP leases - for example, the end of a
|
||
|
school term, or the time at night when a facility is closed and all
|
||
|
machines are required to be powered off.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Date
|
||
|
should be the date on which all assigned BOOTP leases will end. The
|
||
|
date is specified in the form:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.ce 1
|
||
|
W YYYY/MM/DD HH:MM:SS
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
W is the day of the week expressed as a number
|
||
|
from zero (Sunday) to six (Saturday). YYYY is the year, including the
|
||
|
century. MM is the month expressed as a number from 1 to 12. DD is
|
||
|
the day of the month, counting from 1. HH is the hour, from zero to
|
||
|
23. MM is the minute and SS is the second. The time is always in
|
||
|
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), not local time.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I dynamic-bootp-lease-length
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B dynamic-bootp-lease-length\fR \fIlength\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIdynamic-bootp-lease-length\fR statement is used to set the
|
||
|
length of leases dynamically assigned to BOOTP clients. At some
|
||
|
sites, it may be possible to assume that a lease is no longer in
|
||
|
use if its holder has not used BOOTP or DHCP to get its address within
|
||
|
a certain time period. The period is specified in \fIlength\fR as a
|
||
|
number of seconds. If a client reboots using BOOTP during the
|
||
|
timeout period, the lease duration is reset to \fIlength\fR, so a
|
||
|
BOOTP client that boots frequently enough will never lose its lease.
|
||
|
Needless to say, this parameter should be adjusted with extreme
|
||
|
caution.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I filename
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B filename\fR \fB"\fR\fIfilename\fR\fB";\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIfilename\fR statement can be used to specify the name of the
|
||
|
initial boot file which is to be loaded by a client. The
|
||
|
.I filename
|
||
|
should be a filename recognizable to whatever file transfer protocol
|
||
|
the client can be expected to use to load the file.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I fixed-address
|
||
|
declaration
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B fixed-address address\fR [\fB,\fR \fIaddress\fR ... ]\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIfixed-address\fR declaration is used to assign one or more fixed
|
||
|
IP addresses to a client. It should only appear in a \fIhost\fR
|
||
|
declaration. If more than one address is supplied, then when the
|
||
|
client boots, it will be assigned the address that corresponds to the
|
||
|
network on which it is booting. If none of the addresses in the
|
||
|
\fIfixed-address\fR statement are valid for the network to which the client
|
||
|
is connected, that client will not match the \fIhost\fR declaration
|
||
|
containing that \fIfixed-address\fR declaration. Each \fIaddress\fR
|
||
|
in the \fIfixed-address\fR declaration should be either an IP address or
|
||
|
a domain name that resolves to one or more IP addresses.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I get-lease-hostnames
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B get-lease-hostnames\fR \fIflag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIget-lease-hostnames\fR statement is used to tell dhcpd whether
|
||
|
or not to look up the domain name corresponding to the IP address of
|
||
|
each address in the lease pool and use that address for the DHCP
|
||
|
\fIhostname\fR option. If \fIflag\fR is true, then this lookup is
|
||
|
done for all addresses in the current scope. By default, or if
|
||
|
\fIflag\fR is false, no lookups are done.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I hardware
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B hardware \fIhardware-type hardware-address\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In order for a BOOTP client to be recognized, its network hardware
|
||
|
address must be declared using a \fIhardware\fR clause in the
|
||
|
.I host
|
||
|
statement.
|
||
|
.I hardware-type
|
||
|
must be the name of a physical hardware interface type. Currently,
|
||
|
only the
|
||
|
.B ethernet
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
.B token-ring
|
||
|
types are recognized, although support for a
|
||
|
.B fddi
|
||
|
hardware type (and others) would also be desirable.
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I hardware-address
|
||
|
should be a set of hexadecimal octets (numbers from 0 through ff)
|
||
|
separated by colons. The \fIhardware\fR statement may also be used
|
||
|
for DHCP clients.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I infinite-is-reserved
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B infinite-is-reserved \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
ISC DHCP now supports 'reserved' leases. See the section on RESERVED LEASES
|
||
|
below. If this \fIflag\fR is on, the server will automatically reserve leases
|
||
|
allocated to clients which requested an infinite (0xffffffff) lease-time.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The default is off.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I lease-file-name
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B lease-file-name \fIname\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Name
|
||
|
should be the name of the DHCP server's lease file. By default, this
|
||
|
is DBDIR/dhcpd.leases. This statement \fBmust\fR appear in the outer
|
||
|
scope of the configuration file - if it appears in some other scope,
|
||
|
it will have no effect.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I local-port
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B local-port \fIport\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This statement causes the DHCP server to listen for DHCP requests on
|
||
|
the UDP port specified in \fIport\fR, rather than on port 67.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I local-address
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B local-address \fIaddress\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This statement causes the DHCP server to listen for DHCP requests sent
|
||
|
to the specified \fIaddress\fR, rather than requests sent to all addresses.
|
||
|
Since serving directly attached DHCP clients implies that the server must
|
||
|
respond to requests sent to the all-ones IP address, this option cannot be
|
||
|
used if clients are on directly attached networks...it is only realistically
|
||
|
useful for a server whose only clients are reached via unicasts, such as via
|
||
|
DHCP relay agents.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Note: This statement is only effective if the server was compiled using
|
||
|
the USE_SOCKETS #define statement, which is default on a small number of
|
||
|
operating systems, and must be explicitly chosen at compile-time for all
|
||
|
others. You can be sure if your server is compiled with USE_SOCKETS if
|
||
|
you see lines of this format at startup:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Listening on Socket/eth0
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Note also that since this bind()s all DHCP sockets to the specified
|
||
|
address, that only one address may be supported in a daemon at a given
|
||
|
time.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I log-facility
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B log-facility \fIfacility\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This statement causes the DHCP server to do all of its logging on the
|
||
|
specified log facility once the dhcpd.conf file has been read. By
|
||
|
default the DHCP server logs to the daemon facility. Possible log
|
||
|
facilities include auth, authpriv, cron, daemon, ftp, kern, lpr, mail,
|
||
|
mark, news, ntp, security, syslog, user, uucp, and local0 through
|
||
|
local7. Not all of these facilities are available on all systems,
|
||
|
and there may be other facilities available on other systems.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In addition to setting this value, you may need to modify your
|
||
|
.I syslog.conf
|
||
|
file to configure logging of the DHCP server. For example, you might
|
||
|
add a line like this:
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
local7.debug /var/log/dhcpd.log
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The syntax of the \fIsyslog.conf\fR file may be different on some
|
||
|
operating systems - consult the \fIsyslog.conf\fR manual page to be
|
||
|
sure. To get syslog to start logging to the new file, you must first
|
||
|
create the file with correct ownership and permissions (usually, the
|
||
|
same owner and permissions of your /var/log/messages or
|
||
|
/usr/adm/messages file should be fine) and send a SIGHUP to syslogd.
|
||
|
Some systems support log rollover using a shell script or program
|
||
|
called newsyslog or logrotate, and you may be able to configure this
|
||
|
as well so that your log file doesn't grow uncontrollably.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Because the \fIlog-facility\fR setting is controlled by the dhcpd.conf
|
||
|
file, log messages printed while parsing the dhcpd.conf file or before
|
||
|
parsing it are logged to the default log facility. To prevent this,
|
||
|
see the README file included with this distribution, which describes
|
||
|
how to change the default log facility. When this parameter is used,
|
||
|
the DHCP server prints its startup message a second time after parsing
|
||
|
the configuration file, so that the log will be as complete as
|
||
|
possible.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I max-lease-time
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B max-lease-time \fItime\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Time
|
||
|
should be the maximum length in seconds that will be assigned to a
|
||
|
lease. The only exception to this is that Dynamic BOOTP lease
|
||
|
lengths, which are not specified by the client, are not limited by
|
||
|
this maximum.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I min-lease-time
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B min-lease-time \fItime\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Time
|
||
|
should be the minimum length in seconds that will be assigned to a
|
||
|
lease.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I min-secs
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B min-secs \fIseconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Seconds
|
||
|
should be the minimum number of seconds since a client began trying to
|
||
|
acquire a new lease before the DHCP server will respond to its request.
|
||
|
The number of seconds is based on what the client reports, and the maximum
|
||
|
value that the client can report is 255 seconds. Generally, setting this
|
||
|
to one will result in the DHCP server not responding to the client's first
|
||
|
request, but always responding to its second request.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This can be used
|
||
|
to set up a secondary DHCP server which never offers an address to a client
|
||
|
until the primary server has been given a chance to do so. If the primary
|
||
|
server is down, the client will bind to the secondary server, but otherwise
|
||
|
clients should always bind to the primary. Note that this does not, by
|
||
|
itself, permit a primary server and a secondary server to share a pool of
|
||
|
dynamically-allocatable addresses.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I next-server
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B next-server\fR \fIserver-name\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fInext-server\fR statement is used to specify the host address of
|
||
|
the server from which the initial boot file (specified in the
|
||
|
\fIfilename\fR statement) is to be loaded. \fIServer-name\fR should
|
||
|
be a numeric IP address or a domain name. If no \fInext-server\fR statement
|
||
|
applies to a given client, the address 0.0.0.0 is used.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I omapi-port
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B omapi-port\fR \fIport\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIomapi-port\fR statement causes the DHCP server to listen for
|
||
|
OMAPI connections on the specified port. This statement is required
|
||
|
to enable the OMAPI protocol, which is used to examine and modify the
|
||
|
state of the DHCP server as it is running.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I one-lease-per-client
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B one-lease-per-client \fIflag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If this flag is enabled, whenever a client sends a DHCPREQUEST for a
|
||
|
particular lease, the server will automatically free any other leases
|
||
|
the client holds. This presumes that when the client sends a
|
||
|
DHCPREQUEST, it has forgotten any lease not mentioned in the
|
||
|
DHCPREQUEST - i.e., the client has only a single network interface
|
||
|
.I and
|
||
|
it does not remember leases it's holding on networks to which it is
|
||
|
not currently attached. Neither of these assumptions are guaranteed
|
||
|
or provable, so we urge caution in the use of this statement.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I pid-file-name
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B pid-file-name
|
||
|
.I name\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.I Name
|
||
|
should be the name of the DHCP server's process ID file. This is the
|
||
|
file in which the DHCP server's process ID is stored when the server
|
||
|
starts. By default, this is RUNDIR/dhcpd.pid. Like the
|
||
|
lease-file-name statement, this statement must appear in the outer scope
|
||
|
of the configuration file.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I ping-check
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B ping-check
|
||
|
.I flag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
When the DHCP server is considering dynamically allocating an IP
|
||
|
address to a client, it first sends an ICMP Echo request (a \fIping\fR)
|
||
|
to the address being assigned. It waits for a second, and if no
|
||
|
ICMP Echo response has been heard, it assigns the address. If a
|
||
|
response \fIis\fR heard, the lease is abandoned, and the server does
|
||
|
not respond to the client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This \fIping check\fR introduces a default one-second delay in responding
|
||
|
to DHCPDISCOVER messages, which can be a problem for some clients. The
|
||
|
default delay of one second may be configured using the ping-timeout
|
||
|
parameter. The ping-check configuration parameter can be used to control
|
||
|
checking - if its value is false, no ping check is done.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I ping-timeout
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B ping-timeout
|
||
|
.I seconds\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the DHCP server determined it should send an ICMP echo request (a
|
||
|
\fIping\fR) because the ping-check statement is true, ping-timeout allows
|
||
|
you to configure how many seconds the DHCP server should wait for an
|
||
|
ICMP Echo response to be heard, if no ICMP Echo response has been received
|
||
|
before the timeout expires, it assigns the address. If a response \fIis\fR
|
||
|
heard, the lease is abandoned, and the server does not respond to the client.
|
||
|
If no value is set, ping-timeout defaults to 1 second.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I remote-port
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B remote-port \fIport\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
This statement causes the DHCP server to transmit DHCP responses to DHCP
|
||
|
clients upon the UDP port specified in \fIport\fR, rather than on port 68.
|
||
|
In the event that the UDP response is transmitted to a DHCP Relay, the
|
||
|
server generally uses the \fBlocal-port\fR configuration value. Should the
|
||
|
DHCP Relay happen to be addressed as 127.0.0.1, however, the DHCP Server
|
||
|
transmits its response to the \fBremote-port\fR configuration value. This
|
||
|
is generally only useful for testing purposes, and this configuration value
|
||
|
should generally not be used.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I server-identifier
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B server-identifier \fIhostname\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The server-identifier statement can be used to define the value that
|
||
|
is sent in the DHCP Server Identifier option for a given scope. The
|
||
|
value specified \fBmust\fR be an IP address for the DHCP server, and
|
||
|
must be reachable by all clients served by a particular scope.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The use of the server-identifier statement is not recommended - the only
|
||
|
reason to use it is to force a value other than the default value to be
|
||
|
sent on occasions where the default value would be incorrect. The default
|
||
|
value is the first IP address associated with the physical network interface
|
||
|
on which the request arrived.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The usual case where the
|
||
|
\fIserver-identifier\fR statement needs to be sent is when a physical
|
||
|
interface has more than one IP address, and the one being sent by default
|
||
|
isn't appropriate for some or all clients served by that interface.
|
||
|
Another common case is when an alias is defined for the purpose of
|
||
|
having a consistent IP address for the DHCP server, and it is desired
|
||
|
that the clients use this IP address when contacting the server.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Supplying a value for the dhcp-server-identifier option is equivalent
|
||
|
to using the server-identifier statement.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I server-name
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B server-name "\fIname\fB";\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIserver-name\fR statement can be used to inform the client of
|
||
|
the name of the server from which it is booting. \fIName\fR should
|
||
|
be the name that will be provided to the client.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I site-option-space
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B site-option-space "\fIname\fB";\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIsite-option-space\fR statement can be used to determine from
|
||
|
what option space site-local options will be taken. This can be used
|
||
|
in much the same way as the \fIvendor-option-space\fR statement.
|
||
|
Site-local options in DHCP are those options whose numeric codes are
|
||
|
greater than 224. These options are intended for site-specific
|
||
|
uses, but are frequently used by vendors of embedded hardware that
|
||
|
contains DHCP clients. Because site-specific options are allocated
|
||
|
on an ad hoc basis, it is quite possible that one vendor's DHCP client
|
||
|
might use the same option code that another vendor's client uses, for
|
||
|
different purposes. The \fIsite-option-space\fR option can be used
|
||
|
to assign a different set of site-specific options for each such
|
||
|
vendor, using conditional evaluation (see \fBdhcp-eval (5)\fR for
|
||
|
details).
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I stash-agent-options
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B stash-agent-options \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the \fIstash-agent-options\fR parameter is true for a given client,
|
||
|
the server will record the relay agent information options sent during
|
||
|
the client's initial DHCPREQUEST message when the client was in the
|
||
|
SELECTING state and behave as if those options are included in all
|
||
|
subsequent DHCPREQUEST messages sent in the RENEWING state. This
|
||
|
works around a problem with relay agent information options, which is
|
||
|
that they usually not appear in DHCPREQUEST messages sent by the
|
||
|
client in the RENEWING state, because such messages are unicast
|
||
|
directly to the server and not sent through a relay agent.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I update-conflict-detection
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B update-conflict-detection \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the \fIupdate-conflict-detection\fR parameter is true, the server will
|
||
|
perform standard DHCID multiple-client, one-name conflict detection. If
|
||
|
the parameter has been set false, the server will skip this check and
|
||
|
instead simply tear down any previous bindings to install the new
|
||
|
binding without question. The default is true.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I update-optimization
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B update-optimization \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the \fIupdate-optimization\fR parameter is false for a given client,
|
||
|
the server will attempt a DNS update for that client each time the
|
||
|
client renews its lease, rather than only attempting an update when it
|
||
|
appears to be necessary. This will allow the DNS to heal from
|
||
|
database inconsistencies more easily, but the cost is that the DHCP
|
||
|
server must do many more DNS updates. We recommend leaving this option
|
||
|
enabled, which is the default. This option only affects the behavior of
|
||
|
the interim DNS update scheme, and has no effect on the ad-hoc DNS update
|
||
|
scheme. If this parameter is not specified, or is true, the DHCP server
|
||
|
will only update when the client information changes, the client gets a
|
||
|
different lease, or the client's lease expires.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I update-static-leases
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B update-static-leases \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIupdate-static-leases\fR flag, if enabled, causes the DHCP
|
||
|
server to do DNS updates for clients even if those clients are being
|
||
|
assigned their IP address using a \fIfixed-address\fR statement - that
|
||
|
is, the client is being given a static assignment. This can only
|
||
|
work with the \fIinterim\fR DNS update scheme. It is not
|
||
|
recommended because the DHCP server has no way to tell that the update
|
||
|
has been done, and therefore will not delete the record when it is not
|
||
|
in use. Also, the server must attempt the update each time the
|
||
|
client renews its lease, which could have a significant performance
|
||
|
impact in environments that place heavy demands on the DHCP server.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I use-host-decl-names
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B use-host-decl-names \fIflag\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the \fIuse-host-decl-names\fR parameter is true in a given scope,
|
||
|
then for every host declaration within that scope, the name provided
|
||
|
for the host declaration will be supplied to the client as its
|
||
|
hostname. So, for example,
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
group {
|
||
|
use-host-decl-names on;
|
||
|
|
||
|
host joe {
|
||
|
hardware ethernet 08:00:2b:4c:29:32;
|
||
|
fixed-address joe.fugue.com;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
is equivalent to
|
||
|
|
||
|
host joe {
|
||
|
hardware ethernet 08:00:2b:4c:29:32;
|
||
|
fixed-address joe.fugue.com;
|
||
|
option host-name "joe";
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
An \fIoption host-name\fR statement within a host declaration will
|
||
|
override the use of the name in the host declaration.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
It should be noted here that most DHCP clients completely ignore the
|
||
|
host-name option sent by the DHCP server, and there is no way to
|
||
|
configure them not to do this. So you generally have a choice of
|
||
|
either not having any hostname to client IP address mapping that the
|
||
|
client will recognize, or doing DNS updates. It is beyond
|
||
|
the scope of this document to describe how to make this
|
||
|
determination.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I use-lease-addr-for-default-route
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B use-lease-addr-for-default-route \fIflag\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If the \fIuse-lease-addr-for-default-route\fR parameter is true in a
|
||
|
given scope, then instead of sending the value specified in the
|
||
|
routers option (or sending no value at all), the IP address of the
|
||
|
lease being assigned is sent to the client. This supposedly causes
|
||
|
Win95 machines to ARP for all IP addresses, which can be helpful if
|
||
|
your router is configured for proxy ARP. The use of this feature is
|
||
|
not recommended, because it won't work for many DHCP clients.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The
|
||
|
.I vendor-option-space
|
||
|
statement
|
||
|
.RS 0.25i
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
.B vendor-option-space \fIstring\fR\fB;\fR
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
The \fIvendor-option-space\fR parameter determines from what option
|
||
|
space vendor options are taken. The use of this configuration
|
||
|
parameter is illustrated in the \fBdhcp-options(5)\fR manual page, in
|
||
|
the \fIVENDOR ENCAPSULATED OPTIONS\fR section.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.SH SETTING PARAMETER VALUES USING EXPRESSIONS
|
||
|
Sometimes it's helpful to be able to set the value of a DHCP server
|
||
|
parameter based on some value that the client has sent. To do this,
|
||
|
you can use expression evaluation. The
|
||
|
.B dhcp-eval(5)
|
||
|
manual page describes how to write expressions. To assign the result
|
||
|
of an evaluation to an option, define the option as follows:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
.sp 1
|
||
|
\fImy-parameter \fB= \fIexpression \fB;\fR
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
For example:
|
||
|
.nf
|
||
|
.sp 1
|
||
|
ddns-hostname = binary-to-ascii (16, 8, "-",
|
||
|
substring (hardware, 1, 6));
|
||
|
.fi
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.SH RESERVED LEASES
|
||
|
It's often useful to allocate a single address to a single client, in
|
||
|
approximate perpetuity. Host statements with \fBfixed-address\fR clauses
|
||
|
exist to a certain extent to serve this purpose, but because host statements
|
||
|
are intended to approximate 'static configuration', they suffer from not being
|
||
|
referenced in a littany of other Server Services, such as dynamic DNS,
|
||
|
failover, 'on events' and so forth.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
If a standard dynamic lease, as from any range statement, is marked 'reserved',
|
||
|
then the server will only allocate this lease to the client it is identified
|
||
|
by (be that by client identifier or hardware address).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
In practice, this means that the lease follows the normal state engine, enters
|
||
|
ACTIVE state when the client is bound to it, expires, or is released, and any
|
||
|
events or services that would normally be supplied during these events are
|
||
|
processed normally, as with any other dynamic lease. The only difference
|
||
|
is that failover servers treat reserved leases as special when they enter
|
||
|
the FREE or BACKUP states - each server applies the lease into the state it
|
||
|
may allocate from - and the leases are not placed on the queue for allocation
|
||
|
to other clients. Instead they may only be 'found' by client identity. The
|
||
|
result is that the lease is only offered to the returning client.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Care should probably be taken to ensure that the client only has one lease
|
||
|
within a given subnet that it is identified by.
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
Leases may be set 'reserved' either through OMAPI, or through the
|
||
|
\'infinite-is-reserved' configuration option (if this is applicable to your
|
||
|
environment and mixture of clients).
|
||
|
.PP
|
||
|
It should also be noted that leases marked 'reserved' are effectively treated
|
||
|
the same as leases marked 'bootp'.
|
||
|
.RE
|
||
|
.SH REFERENCE: OPTION STATEMENTS
|
||
|
DHCP option statements are documented in the
|
||
|
.B dhcp-options(5)
|
||
|
manual page.
|
||
|
.SH REFERENCE: EXPRESSIONS
|
||
|
Expressions used in DHCP option statements and elsewhere are
|
||
|
documented in the
|
||
|
.B dhcp-eval(5)
|
||
|
manual page.
|
||
|
.SH SEE ALSO
|
||
|
dhcpd(8), dhcpd.leases(5), dhcp-options(5), dhcp-eval(5), RFC2132, RFC2131.
|
||
|
.SH AUTHOR
|
||
|
.B dhcpd.conf(5)
|
||
|
was written by Ted Lemon
|
||
|
under a contract with Vixie Labs. Funding
|
||
|
for this project was provided by Internet Systems Consortium.
|
||
|
Information about Internet Systems Consortium can be found at
|
||
|
.B http://www.isc.org.
|