rpms/dbus
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity
1db1f50488
dbus/SOURCES/dbus-1.12.8-fix-fd-limit-change.patch
CentOS Sources e1ec2630bf import dbus-1.12.8-12.el8_4.2
2021-09-09 15:54:43 +00:00

202 lines
8.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From 94bacc6955e563a7e698e53151a75323279a9f45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:03:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] bus: Try to raise soft fd limit to match hard limit
Linux systems have traditionally set the soft limit to 1024 and the hard
limit to 4096. Recent versions of systemd keep the soft fd limit at
1024 to avoid breaking programs that still use select(), but raise the
hard limit to 512*1024, while in recent Debian versions a complicated
interaction between components gives a soft limit of 1024 and a hard
limit of 1024*1024. If we can, we might as well elevate our soft limit
to match the hard limit, minimizing the chance that we will run out of
file descriptor slots.
Unlike the previous code to raise the hard and soft limits to at least
65536, we do this even if we don't have privileges: privileges are
unnecessary to raise the soft limit up to the hard limit.
If we *do* have privileges, we also continue to raise the hard and soft
limits to at least 65536 if they weren't already that high, making
it harder to carry out a denial of service attack on the system bus on
systems that use the traditional limit (CVE-2014-7824).
As was previously the case on the system bus, we'll drop the limits back
to our initial limits before we execute a subprocess for traditional
(non-systemd) activation, if enabled.
systemd activation doesn't involve us starting subprocesses at all,
so in both cases activated services will still inherit the same limits
they did previously.
This change also fixes a bug when the hard limit is very large but
the soft limit is not, for example seen as a regression when upgrading
to systemd >= 240 (Debian #928877). In such environments, dbus-daemon
would previously have changed its fd limit to 64K soft/64K hard. Because
this hard limit is less than its original hard limit, it was unable to
restore its original hard limit as intended when carrying out traditional
activation, leaving activated subprocesses with unintended limits (while
logging a warning).
Reviewed-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
[smcv: Correct a comment based on Lennart's review, reword commit message]
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7eacbfece70f16bb54d0f3ac51f87ae398759ef5)
[smcv: Mention that this also fixes Debian #928877]
---
bus/bus.c | 8 ++---
dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-unix.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-win.c | 3 +-
dbus/dbus-sysdeps.h | 3 +-
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bus/bus.c b/bus/bus.c
index 30ce4e10..2ad8e789 100644
--- a/bus/bus.c
+++ b/bus/bus.c
@@ -693,11 +693,11 @@ raise_file_descriptor_limit (BusContext *context)
/* We used to compute a suitable rlimit based on the configured number
* of connections, but that breaks down as soon as we allow fd-passing,
* because each connection is allowed to pass 64 fds to us, and if
- * they all did, we'd hit kernel limits. We now hard-code 64k as a
- * good limit, like systemd does: that's enough to avoid DoS from
- * anything short of multiple uids conspiring against us.
+ * they all did, we'd hit kernel limits. We now hard-code a good
+ * limit that is enough to avoid DoS from anything short of multiple
+ * uids conspiring against us, much like systemd does.
*/
- if (!_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit_if_privileged (65536, &error))
+ if (!_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit (&error))
{
bus_context_log (context, DBUS_SYSTEM_LOG_WARNING,
"%s: %s", error.name, error.message);
diff --git a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-unix.c b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-unix.c
index 2be5b779..7c4c3604 100644
--- a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-unix.c
+++ b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-unix.c
@@ -406,23 +406,15 @@ _dbus_rlimit_save_fd_limit (DBusError *error)
return self;
}
+/* Enough fds that we shouldn't run out, even if several uids work
+ * together to carry out a denial-of-service attack. This happens to be
+ * the same number that systemd < 234 would normally use. */
+#define ENOUGH_FDS 65536
+
dbus_bool_t
-_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit_if_privileged (unsigned int desired,
- DBusError *error)
+_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit (DBusError *error)
{
- struct rlimit lim;
-
- /* No point to doing this practically speaking
- * if we're not uid 0. We expect the system
- * bus to use this before we change UID, and
- * the session bus takes the Linux default,
- * currently 1024 for cur and 4096 for max.
- */
- if (getuid () != 0)
- {
- /* not an error, we're probably the session bus */
- return TRUE;
- }
+ struct rlimit old, lim;
if (getrlimit (RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim) < 0)
{
@@ -431,22 +423,43 @@ _dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit_if_privileged (unsigned int desired,
return FALSE;
}
- if (lim.rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY || lim.rlim_cur >= desired)
+ old = lim;
+
+ if (getuid () == 0)
{
- /* not an error, everything is fine */
- return TRUE;
+ /* We are privileged, so raise the soft limit to at least
+ * ENOUGH_FDS, and the hard limit to at least the desired soft
+ * limit. This assumes we can exercise CAP_SYS_RESOURCE on Linux,
+ * or other OSs' equivalents. */
+ if (lim.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY &&
+ lim.rlim_cur < ENOUGH_FDS)
+ lim.rlim_cur = ENOUGH_FDS;
+
+ if (lim.rlim_max != RLIM_INFINITY &&
+ lim.rlim_max < lim.rlim_cur)
+ lim.rlim_max = lim.rlim_cur;
}
- /* Ignore "maximum limit", assume we have the "superuser"
- * privileges. On Linux this is CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.
- */
- lim.rlim_cur = lim.rlim_max = desired;
+ /* Raise the soft limit to match the hard limit, which we can do even
+ * if we are unprivileged. In particular, systemd >= 240 will normally
+ * set rlim_cur to 1024 and rlim_max to 512*1024, recent Debian
+ * versions end up setting rlim_cur to 1024 and rlim_max to 1024*1024,
+ * and older and non-systemd Linux systems would typically set rlim_cur
+ * to 1024 and rlim_max to 4096. */
+ if (lim.rlim_max == RLIM_INFINITY || lim.rlim_cur < lim.rlim_max)
+ lim.rlim_cur = lim.rlim_max;
+
+ /* Early-return if there is nothing to do. */
+ if (lim.rlim_max == old.rlim_max &&
+ lim.rlim_cur == old.rlim_cur)
+ return TRUE;
if (setrlimit (RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim) < 0)
{
dbus_set_error (error, _dbus_error_from_errno (errno),
- "Failed to set fd limit to %u: %s",
- desired, _dbus_strerror (errno));
+ "Failed to set fd limit to %lu: %s",
+ (unsigned long) lim.rlim_cur,
+ _dbus_strerror (errno));
return FALSE;
}
@@ -485,8 +498,7 @@ _dbus_rlimit_save_fd_limit (DBusError *error)
}
dbus_bool_t
-_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit_if_privileged (unsigned int desired,
- DBusError *error)
+_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit (DBusError *error)
{
fd_limit_not_supported (error);
return FALSE;
diff --git a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-win.c b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-win.c
index 1ef4ae6c..1c1d9f7d 100644
--- a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-win.c
+++ b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-util-win.c
@@ -273,8 +273,7 @@ _dbus_rlimit_save_fd_limit (DBusError *error)
}
dbus_bool_t
-_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit_if_privileged (unsigned int desired,
- DBusError *error)
+_dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit (DBusError *error)
{
fd_limit_not_supported (error);
return FALSE;
diff --git a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps.h b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps.h
index ef786ecc..0b9d7696 100644
--- a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps.h
+++ b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps.h
@@ -698,8 +698,7 @@ dbus_bool_t _dbus_replace_install_prefix (DBusString *path);
typedef struct DBusRLimit DBusRLimit;
DBusRLimit *_dbus_rlimit_save_fd_limit (DBusError *error);
-dbus_bool_t _dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit_if_privileged (unsigned int desired,
- DBusError *error);
+dbus_bool_t _dbus_rlimit_raise_fd_limit (DBusError *error);
dbus_bool_t _dbus_rlimit_restore_fd_limit (DBusRLimit *saved,
DBusError *error);
void _dbus_rlimit_free (DBusRLimit *lim);
--
GitLab
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink