cups/SOURCES/cups-fstack-strong.patch
2022-05-17 15:24:38 +00:00

50 lines
1.8 KiB
Diff

diff --git a/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4 b/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4
index 733b06c..bb770f0 100644
--- a/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4
+++ b/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4
@@ -123,21 +123,35 @@ if test -n "$GCC"; then
OPTIM="-fPIC $OPTIM"
fi
- # The -fstack-protector option is available with some versions of
- # GCC and adds "stack canaries" which detect when the return address
- # has been overwritten, preventing many types of exploit attacks.
- AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether compiler supports -fstack-protector)
+ # The -fstack-protector-strong and -fstack-protector options are available
+ # with some versions of# GCC and adds "stack canaries" which detect
+ # when the return address has been overwritten, preventing many types of exploit attacks.
+ # First check for -fstack-protector-strong, then for -fstack-protector...
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether compiler supports -fstack-protector-strong])
OLDCFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
- CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fstack-protector"
- AC_TRY_LINK(,,
+ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fstack-protector-strong"
+ AC_TRY_LINK(,,[
if test "x$LSB_BUILD" = xy; then
# Can't use stack-protector with LSB binaries...
OPTIM="$OPTIM -fno-stack-protector"
else
- OPTIM="$OPTIM -fstack-protector"
+ OPTIM="$OPTIM -fstack-protector-strong"
fi
- AC_MSG_RESULT(yes),
- AC_MSG_RESULT(no))
+ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
+ ], [
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether compiler supports -fstack-protector])
+ CFLAGS="$OLDCFLAGS -fstack-protector"
+ AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()], [
+ AS_IF([test "x$LSB_BUILD" = xy], [
+ # Can't use stack-protector with LSB binaries...
+ OPTIM="$OPTIM -fno-stack-protector"
+ ], [
+ OPTIM="$OPTIM -fstack-protector"
+ ])
+ ], [
+ AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
+ ])
+ ])
CFLAGS="$OLDCFLAGS"
if test "x$LSB_BUILD" != xy; then