- add a %check script to catch problems like #249210

cracklib.spec

@@ -150,6 +150,29 @@ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libcrack.la
 
 %find_lang %{name}
 
+%check
+# We want to check that the new library is able to open the new dictionaries,
+# using the new python module.
+LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} %{__python} 2>&1 << EOF
+import string, sys
+# Prepend buildroot-specific variations of the python path to the python path.
+syspath2=[]
+for element in sys.path:
+	syspath2.append("$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/" + element)
+syspath2.reverse()
+for element in syspath2:
+	sys.path.insert(0,element)
+# Now actually do the test.  If we get a different result, or throw an
+# exception, the script will end with the error.
+import cracklib
+s = cracklib.FascistCheck("cracklib", "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{dictpath}")
+expected = "it is based on a dictionary word"
+if s != expected:
+	print "Got unexpected result \"%s\"," % s,
+	print "instead of expected value of \"%s\"." % expected
+	sys.exit(1)
+EOF
+
 %clean
 [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
@@ -185,6 +208,9 @@ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libcrack.la
 %{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/cracklibmodule.so
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Jul 23 2007 Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
+- add a %%check script to catch things like #249210
+
 * Mon Jul 23 2007 Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com> - 2.8.10-2
 - work around non-executable util/cracklib-format giving us empty/garbage
   dictionaries (#249210)