checkpolicy/0002-libsepol-cil-fix-signed-overflow-caused-by-using-1-3.patch
Petr Lautrbach 497bda00f7 Rebase on db0f2f382e31 at SELinuxProject
- Optimize storage of filename transitions
- Fix signed overflow caused by using (1 << 31) - 1
2020-11-01 14:51:04 +01:00

91 lines
4.1 KiB
Diff

From 521e6a2f478a4c7a7c198c017d4d12e8667d89e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:19:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libsepol/cil: fix signed overflow caused by using (1 << 31) -
1
When compiling SELinux userspace tools with -ftrapv (this option
generates traps for signed overflow on addition, subtraction,
multiplication operations, instead of silently wrapping around),
semodule crashes when running the tests from
scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh in a Fedora 32 virtual machine:
[root@localhost selinux-testsuite]# make test
make -C policy load
make[1]: Entering directory '/root/selinux-testsuite/policy'
# Test for "expand-check = 0" in /etc/selinux/semanage.conf
# General policy build
make[2]: Entering directory '/root/selinux-testsuite/policy/test_policy'
Compiling targeted test_policy module
Creating targeted test_policy.pp policy package
rm tmp/test_policy.mod.fc
make[2]: Leaving directory '/root/selinux-testsuite/policy/test_policy'
# General policy load
domain_fd_use --> off
/usr/sbin/semodule -i test_policy/test_policy.pp test_mlsconstrain.cil test_overlay_defaultrange.cil test_add_levels.cil test_glblub.cil
make[1]: *** [Makefile:174: load] Aborted (core dumped)
Using "coredumpctl gdb" leads to the following strack trace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f608fe4fa25 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f608fe38895 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f6090028aca in __addvsi3.cold () from /lib64/libsepol.so.1
#3 0x00007f6090096f59 in __avrule_xperm_setrangebits (low=30, high=30, xperms=0x8b9eea0)
at ../cil/src/cil_binary.c:1551
#4 0x00007f60900970dd in __cil_permx_bitmap_to_sepol_xperms_list (xperms=0xb650a30, xperms_list=0x7ffce2653b18)
at ../cil/src/cil_binary.c:1596
#5 0x00007f6090097286 in __cil_avrulex_ioctl_to_policydb (k=0xb8ec200 "@\023\214\022\006", datum=0xb650a30,
args=0x239a640) at ../cil/src/cil_binary.c:1649
#6 0x00007f609003f1e5 in hashtab_map (h=0x41f8710, apply=0x7f60900971da <__cil_avrulex_ioctl_to_policydb>,
args=0x239a640) at hashtab.c:234
#7 0x00007f609009ea19 in cil_binary_create_allocated_pdb (db=0x2394f10, policydb=0x239a640)
at ../cil/src/cil_binary.c:4969
#8 0x00007f609009d19d in cil_binary_create (db=0x2394f10, policydb=0x7ffce2653d30) at ../cil/src/cil_binary.c:4329
#9 0x00007f609008ec23 in cil_build_policydb_create_pdb (db=0x2394f10, sepol_db=0x7ffce2653d30)
at ../cil/src/cil.c:631
#10 0x00007f608fff4bf3 in semanage_direct_commit () from /lib64/libsemanage.so.1
#11 0x00007f608fff9fae in semanage_commit () from /lib64/libsemanage.so.1
#12 0x0000000000403e2b in main (argc=7, argv=0x7ffce2655058) at semodule.c:753
(gdb) f 3
#3 0x00007f6090096f59 in __avrule_xperm_setrangebits (low=30, high=30, xperms=0x8b9eea0)
at ../cil/src/cil_binary.c:1551
1551 xperms->perms[i] |= XPERM_SETBITS(h) - XPERM_SETBITS(low);
A signed integer overflow therefore occurs in XPERM_SETBITS(h):
#define XPERM_SETBITS(x) ((1 << (x & 0x1f)) - 1)
This macro is expanded with h=31, so "(1 << 31) - 1" is computed:
* (1 << 31) = -0x80000000 is the lowest signed 32-bit integer value
* (1 << 31) - 1 overflows the capacity of a signed 32-bit integer and
results in 0x7fffffff (which is unsigned)
Using unsigned integers (with "1U") fixes the crash, as
(1U << 31) = 0x80000000U has no overflowing issues.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
Acked-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
---
checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/checkpolicy/policy_define.c b/checkpolicy/policy_define.c
index 395f62284e3c..bf6c3e68bef3 100644
--- a/checkpolicy/policy_define.c
+++ b/checkpolicy/policy_define.c
@@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ out:
/* index of the u32 containing the permission */
#define XPERM_IDX(x) (x >> 5)
/* set bits 0 through x-1 within the u32 */
-#define XPERM_SETBITS(x) ((1 << (x & 0x1f)) - 1)
+#define XPERM_SETBITS(x) ((1U << (x & 0x1f)) - 1)
/* low value for this u32 */
#define XPERM_LOW(x) (x << 5)
/* high value for this u32 */
--
2.29.0