rpms/boost
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Add forgotten boost-1.54.0-__GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG.patch

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Petr Machata 2013-07-27 11:41:56 +02:00
parent 4c75e770a9
commit 830a7f44cf
1 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
boost-1.54.0-__GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
diff -up boost_1_54_0/boost/cstdint.hpp\~ boost_1_54_0/boost/cstdint.hpp
--- boost_1_54_0/boost/cstdint.hpp~ 2013-03-09 14:55:05.000000000 -0800
+++ boost_1_54_0/boost/cstdint.hpp 2013-07-15 13:19:07.344108660 -0700
@@ -41,7 +41,15 @@
// so we disable use of stdint.h when GLIBC does not define __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG.
// See https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3548 and http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
//
-#if defined(BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H) && (!defined(__GLIBC__) || defined(__GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG))
+// This define has been dropped altogether in GLIBC 2.17. As of then,
+// support for long long is part of baseline requirements, and
+// [u]int64_t is always defined. See here:
+// http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-01/msg00440.html
+//
+#if defined(BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H) \
+ && (!defined(__GLIBC__) \
+ || defined(__GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG) \
+ || (defined __GLIBC_PREREQ && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,17)))
// The following #include is an implementation artifact; not part of interface.
# ifdef __hpux
Diff finished. Mon Jul 15 13:19:50 2013